• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of cardiac and noncardiac cirrhosis on coronary revascularization outcomes from the National Inpatient Sample, 2016 to 2018.2016年至2018年全国住院患者样本中心脏性和非心脏性肝硬化对冠状动脉血运重建结局的影响
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Nov 17;36(2):195-200. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2139989. eCollection 2023.
2
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
3
Coronary revascularization in patients with liver cirrhosis.肝硬化患者的冠状动脉血运重建。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 May;91(5):1393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.022. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在需要透析的终末期肾病患者中的比较(CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 登记研究队列-2 的 5 年结果)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with reduced ejection fraction.射血分数降低的患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;161(3):1022-1031.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.159. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
6
Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Surgical Myocardial Revascularization: Results From the E-CABG (European Multicenter Study on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) With a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与外科血运重建患者的死亡率:E-CABG(欧洲冠状动脉旁路移植术多中心研究)的系统评价和荟萃分析结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb;11(2):e005650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005650.
7
Outcomes of different revascularization strategies among patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes without ST elevation.急性冠状动脉综合征无 ST 段抬高患者不同血运重建策略的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;160(4):926-935.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.08.130. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
8
Clinical Outcome of Noncardiac Surgery in Patients With History of Coronary Artery Revascularization by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术进行冠状动脉血运重建的患者非心脏手术的临床结局
Jpn Clin Med. 2018 Jan 3;9:1179670717748945. doi: 10.1177/1179670717748945. eCollection 2018.
9
Acute Kidney Injury and In-Hospital Mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Study.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤及院内死亡率:一项全国性研究
Am J Nephrol. 2017;45(3):217-225. doi: 10.1159/000455906. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
The impact of previous revascularization on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.既往血运重建对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床结局的影响。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 Apr;25(4):166-9.

本文引用的文献

1
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e4-e17. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001039. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Relationship between Admission Electrolyte Level and Short-term Prognosis of Patients with Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后入院时电解质水平与短期预后的关系
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Aug 9;2021:4664965. doi: 10.1155/2021/4664965. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparison of Outcomes of Patients With Versus Without Chronic Liver Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.比较慢性肝病患者与非慢性肝病患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;156:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.044. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
4
Temporal Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Insights From the Washington Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的时间趋势:来自华盛顿心脏护理结果评估计划的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e015317. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015317. Epub 2020 May 27.
5
Trends in the Burden of Chronic Liver Disease Among Hospitalized US Adults.美国住院成年人群慢性肝脏疾病负担的变化趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e201997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1997.
6
Impact Of Cirrhosis On 90-Day Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from A Nationwide Database).肝硬化对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后90天结局的影响(来自全国性数据库)
Am J Cardiol. 2020 May 1;125(9):1295-1304. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.052. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
7
Temporal trends in the utilization and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with liver cirrhosis.肝硬化患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的利用和结局的时间趋势。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):802-810. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28593. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with cirrhosis and acute myocardial infarction - A 13-year nationwide cohort study.肝硬化合并急性心肌梗死患者的双联抗血小板治疗:一项全国性 13 年队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 3;14(10):e0223380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223380. eCollection 2019.
9
Outcomes of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with end-stage liver disease.终末期肝病患者院内心肺复苏的结局。
Liver Int. 2019 Jul;39(7):1256-1262. doi: 10.1111/liv.14079. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
10
Hemostasis, bleeding and thrombosis in liver disease.肝病中的止血、出血和血栓形成
J Transl Sci. 2017 May;3(3). doi: 10.15761/JTS.1000182. Epub 2017 Mar 4.

2016年至2018年全国住院患者样本中心脏性和非心脏性肝硬化对冠状动脉血运重建结局的影响

Impact of cardiac and noncardiac cirrhosis on coronary revascularization outcomes from the National Inpatient Sample, 2016 to 2018.

作者信息

Park Dae Yong, An Seokyung, Warraich Muhammad-Sheharyar, Aldeen Ziad Sad, Maghari Ibrahim, Khanal Smriti, Arif Abdul Wahab, Almoghrabi Anas

机构信息

Department of Medicine, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County , Chicago , Illinois.

Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School , Seoul , Korea.

出版信息

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Nov 17;36(2):195-200. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2139989. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1080/08998280.2022.2139989
PMID:36876247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9980685/
Abstract

Data on coronary revascularization in patients with cirrhosis are scarce because it is often deferred in the setting of significant comorbidities and coagulopathies. It is unknown whether patients with cardiac cirrhosis have a worse prognosis. The National Inpatient Sample was surveyed to identify patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) from 2016 to 2018. Those with and without liver cirrhosis were propensity score-matched and compared within the PCI and CABG cohorts. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Patients with cirrhosis were further classified into cardiac and noncardiac cirrhosis and their in-hospital mortalities were compared. A total of 1,069,730 PCIs and 273,715 CABGs were performed for ACS, of which 0.6% and 0.7%, respectively, were performed in patients with cirrhosis. In both the PCI cohort (odds ratio = 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.25;  = 0.01) and the CABG cohort (odds ratio = 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-4.62;  = 0.01), cirrhosis was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality was greatest in cardiac cirrhosis (8.4% and 7.1%), followed by noncardiac cirrhosis (5.5% and 5.0%) and no cirrhosis (2.6% and 2.3%) in PCI and CABG cohorts, respectively. Higher in-hospital mortality and periprocedural morbidities should be considered when performing coronary revascularization in patients with cirrhosis.

摘要

关于肝硬化患者冠状动脉血运重建的数据很少,因为在存在严重合并症和凝血障碍的情况下,这一操作常常被推迟。目前尚不清楚患有心源性肝硬化的患者预后是否更差。我们对全国住院患者样本进行了调查,以确定2016年至2018年期间因急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者。在PCI和CABG队列中,对有肝硬化和无肝硬化的患者进行倾向评分匹配并比较。主要结局是住院死亡率。将肝硬化患者进一步分为心源性和非心源性肝硬化,并比较他们的住院死亡率。总共为ACS进行了1,069,730例PCI和273,715例CABG,其中分别有0.6%和0.7%是在肝硬化患者中进行的。在PCI队列(优势比 = 1.56;95%置信区间,1.10 - 2.25;P = 0.01)和CABG队列(优势比 = 2.34;95%置信区间,1.19 - 4.62;P = 0.01)中,肝硬化均与较高的住院死亡率相关。在PCI和CABG队列中,住院死亡率在心源性肝硬化患者中最高(分别为8.4%和7.1%),其次是非心源性肝硬化(分别为5.5%和5.0%),无肝硬化患者最低(分别为2.6%和2.3%)。在对肝硬化患者进行冠状动脉血运重建时,应考虑到较高的住院死亡率和围手术期发病率。