Bavbek Nehir Canigur, Roulet Jean-François, Ozcan Mutlu
J Adhes Dent. 2014 Oct;16(5):473-80. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a32812.
To evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of orthodontic resin cement to monolithic zirconium oxide ceramic (MZ) after different surface conditioning methods.
Two types of MZ (BruxZir Solid Zirconia, n = 60; Prettau-Zirkon, n = 60) with two types of surface finish (glazed, n = 30 per group; polished, n = 30 per group) were tested after two surface conditioning methods: 1. air abrasion with 30-μm silica coated aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) particles (CoJet), or 2. air abrasion with 50-μm Al₂O₃particles. The non-conditioned group acted as the control. A universal primer (Monobond-Plus) and an orthodontic primer (Transbond-XT Primer) were applied to all specimen surfaces. Orthodontic resin composite (Transbond-XT) was bonded using a mold and photopolymerized. The bonded specimens were subjected to μSBS testing (0.5 mm/min). Data were analyzed statistically using three-way ANOVA and the Sidac adjustment post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope (30X).
Mean μSBS values (MPa) did not show a significant difference between the two brands of MZ (p > 0.05). In both glazed (44 ± 6.4) and polished (45.9 ± 4.8) groups, CoJet application showed the highest μSBS values (p < 0.001). The control group (34.4 ± 6) presented significantly better results compared to that of Al₂O₃(30 ± 3.8) (p < 0.05) on glazed surfaces, but it was the opposite in the polished groups (control: 20.3 ± 4.7; Al₂O₃: 33.8 ± 4.7; p < 0.001). Adhesive failure was the dominant type in all groups. Conditioning MZs with Al₂O₃and CoJet increased the percentage of mixed failure type.
Air abrasion with CoJet followed by the application of universal primer improved the μSBS of orthodontic resin to both the polished and glazed monolithic zirconium oxide materials tested.
评估不同表面处理方法后正畸树脂水门汀与整体式氧化锆陶瓷(MZ)之间的微剪切粘结强度(μSBS)。
两种类型的MZ(BruxZir Solid Zirconia,n = 60;Prettau-Zirkon,n = 60),两种表面光洁度(上釉,每组n = 30;抛光,每组n = 30),在两种表面处理方法后进行测试:1. 用30μm二氧化硅涂层氧化铝(Al₂O₃)颗粒进行空气喷砂(CoJet),或2. 用50μm Al₂O₃颗粒进行空气喷砂。未处理组作为对照。所有样本表面均使用通用底漆(Monobond-Plus)和正畸底漆(Transbond-XT Primer)。使用模具粘结正畸树脂复合材料(Transbond-XT)并进行光固化。对粘结样本进行μSBS测试(0.5 mm/min)。数据采用三因素方差分析和Sidak校正事后检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。使用体视显微镜(30倍)分析失败模式。
两种品牌的MZ之间的平均μSBS值(MPa)无显著差异(p > 0.05)。在上釉组(44 ± 6.4)和抛光组(45.9 ± 4.8)中,应用CoJet后的μSBS值最高(p < 0.001)。在上釉表面,对照组(34.4 ± 6)的结果明显优于Al₂O₃处理组(30 ± 3.8)(p < 0.05),但在抛光组中情况相反(对照组:20.3 ± 4.7;Al₂O₃处理组:33.8 ± 4.7;p < 0.001)。所有组中粘结失败均为主要类型。用Al₂O₃和CoJet处理MZ增加了混合失败类型的比例。
使用CoJet进行空气喷砂后再应用通用底漆可提高正畸树脂与测试的抛光和上釉整体式氧化锆材料之间的μSBS。