• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用通用粘合剂将托槽粘结到全瓷材料上。

Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives.

作者信息

Goracci Cecilia, Di Bello Giuseppe, Franchi Lorenzo, Louca Chris, Juloski Jelena, Juloski Jovana, Vichi Alessandro

机构信息

Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50127 Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;15(3):1245. doi: 10.3390/ma15031245.

DOI:10.3390/ma15031245
PMID:35161189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8839010/
Abstract

The need for bracket bonding to ceramic restorations is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of universal adhesives on bracket adhesion to polished or glazed lithium disilicate (LDS) and monolithic zirconia (MZ) surfaces. One hundred and twenty brackets (N = 10) were bonded to either polished or glazed LDS (e.max CAD B32, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and MZ (In-Ceram YZ, VITA, Bad Sackingen, Germany) blocks using three different adhesives combined with Transbond™ XT Paste (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). Tested universal adhesives were Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive (SU, 3M St. Paul, MN, USA) and Assure Plus (AP, Reliance, Itasca, IL, USA). Transbond™ XT Primer (XTP, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) served as a control adhesive. Bracket bond strength was measured in shear mode (SBS). Failure type was determined by the Modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Data were statistically analyzed. On polished LDS, SU yielded bracket SBS significantly superior to those of AP and XTP. On polished MZ, the use of SU and AP significantly enhanced bracket retention as compared with XTP. Low SBS values, below the threshold of clinical acceptability, were reached by all tested adhesives on glazed LDS and MZ specimens. SBS measurements corresponded with failure type observations. Universal adhesives SU and AP could be considered for use on polished LDS and MZ surfaces.

摘要

将托槽粘结到陶瓷修复体上的需求日益增加。本研究的目的是评估通用粘结剂对托槽粘结到抛光或上釉的二硅酸锂(LDS)和整体式氧化锆(MZ)表面的效果。使用三种不同的粘结剂与Transbond™ XT糊剂(美国加利福尼亚州蒙罗维亚3M Unitek公司)结合,将120个托槽(每组10个)粘结到抛光或上釉的LDS(e.max CAD B32,列支敦士登沙恩义获嘉伟瓦登特公司)和MZ(德国巴特萨克根维他公司的In-Ceram YZ)块上。测试的通用粘结剂为Scotchbond™通用粘结剂(SU,美国明尼苏达州圣保罗3M公司)和Assure Plus(AP,美国伊利诺伊州伊塔斯卡信赖公司)。Transbond™ XT底漆(XTP,美国加利福尼亚州蒙罗维亚3M Unitek公司)用作对照粘结剂。以剪切模式(SBS)测量托槽粘结强度。通过改良粘结剂残留指数(ARI)确定失败类型。对数据进行统计学分析。在抛光的LDS上,SU产生的托槽SBS显著优于AP和XTP。在抛光的MZ上,与XTP相比,使用SU和AP显著提高了托槽的固位力。在釉质化的LDS和MZ试件上,所有测试的粘结剂的SBS值均低于临床可接受阈值。SBS测量结果与失败类型观察结果一致。通用粘结剂SU和AP可考虑用于抛光的LDS和MZ表面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a0/8839010/2c660117bc81/materials-15-01245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a0/8839010/2c660117bc81/materials-15-01245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a0/8839010/2c660117bc81/materials-15-01245-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives.使用通用粘合剂将托槽粘结到全瓷材料上。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;15(3):1245. doi: 10.3390/ma15031245.
2
Bracket bonding to polymethylmethacrylate-based materials for computer-aided design/manufacture of temporary restorations: Influence of mechanical treatment and chemical treatment with universal adhesives.用于计算机辅助设计/制造临时修复体的基于聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯材料的托槽粘结:通用粘结剂的机械处理和化学处理的影响
Korean J Orthod. 2019 Nov;49(6):404-412. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.6.404. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
Comparison of bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded to zirconia surfaces using different zirconia primers and a universal adhesive.使用不同的氧化锆底漆和一种通用粘合剂对粘结在氧化锆表面的陶瓷托槽的粘结强度进行比较。
Restor Dent Endod. 2018 Jan 22;43(1):e7. doi: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e7. eCollection 2018 Feb.
4
[In vitro study evaluating the shear bond strength of metal brackets to lithium disilicate ceramic support using a universal adhesive].[使用通用粘合剂评估金属托槽与二硅酸锂陶瓷基底之间剪切粘结强度的体外研究]
Orthod Fr. 2022 Jun 1;93(2):101-109. doi: 10.1684/orthodfr.2022.56.
5
Comparison of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to ceramic surfaces utilizing different adhesive systems: An study.使用不同粘结系统将金属托槽粘结到陶瓷表面的剪切粘结强度比较:一项研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Nov 2;12:73. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_12_23. eCollection 2023.
6
Bond strength, degree of conversion, and microorganism adhesion using different bracket-to-enamel bonding protocols.使用不同的托槽与牙釉质粘结方案时的粘结强度、固化程度和微生物粘附情况。
J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Oct;84(Suppl 3):210-221. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00430-6. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
7
Effects of enamel sealing on shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant index : Study of three fluoride-releasing adhesives in combination with metal and ceramic brackets.釉质封闭对剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的影响:三种含氟粘结剂与金属及陶瓷托槽联合应用的研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Jan;78(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0065-x. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
8
Shear bond strength of brackets on restorative materials: Comparison on various dental restorative materials using the universal primer Monobond® Plus.修复材料上托槽的剪切粘结强度:使用通用底漆单组分粘结剂Plus对各种牙科修复材料的比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Mar;77(2):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0011-y. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
9
Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study.不同类型黏结剂对正畸托槽剪切黏结强度的影响:一项循环加载研究。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;16(2):724. doi: 10.3390/ma16020724.
10
Comparison of shear bond strength of plastic and ceramic brackets.塑料与陶瓷托槽剪切粘结强度的比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Sep;75(5):345-57. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0236-6. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Shear bond strength and ARI scores of metal brackets to glazed glass ceramics and zirconia: an in vitro study investigating surface treatment protocols.金属托槽与釉质玻璃陶瓷和氧化锆之间的剪切粘结强度及抗脱粘指数评分:一项探究表面处理方案的体外研究
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 28;24(1):1567. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05369-1.
2
Can a Self-etching Primer be Effective in Bonding Aligner Attachments to Different Types of Ceramics?自酸蚀底漆能否有效地将矫治器附件粘结到不同类型的陶瓷上?
Turk J Orthod. 2024 Mar 28;37(1):30-35. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.173.
3
The possibility of clinical bonding between metal/ceramic brackets to zirconia: study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between Hydrofluoric Acid and Single-Component Primer as Conditioners on Resin Cement Adhesion to Lithium Silicate and Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramics.氢氟酸与单组分底漆作为调节剂对树脂水门汀与硅酸锂和二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷粘结的比较。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 10;14(22):6776. doi: 10.3390/ma14226776.
2
The effect of various mechanical and chemical surface conditioning on the bonding of orthodontic brackets to all ceramic materials.各种机械和化学表面处理对正畸托槽与全陶瓷材料粘结的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):370-374. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
Bond Strength of Metallic or Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets to Enamel, Acrylic, or Porcelain Surfaces.
金属/陶瓷托槽与氧化锆之间临床粘结的可能性:研究
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jan 15;12:1354241. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1354241. eCollection 2024.
4
Mechanical Properties of Orthodontic Cements and Their Behavior in Acidic Environments.正畸粘结剂的力学性能及其在酸性环境中的行为
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 9;15(22):7904. doi: 10.3390/ma15227904.
5
Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia restorations and metal brackets.不同预处理和附着材料对整体氧化锆修复体与金属托槽之间抗剪粘接强度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 20;12(1):8514. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12542-5.
金属或陶瓷正畸托槽与牙釉质、丙烯酸或瓷表面的粘结强度。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 17;13(22):5197. doi: 10.3390/ma13225197.
4
Primer-Treated Ceramic Bracket Increases Shear Bond Strength on Dental Zirconia Surface.底漆处理的陶瓷托槽可提高在牙科氧化锆表面的剪切粘结强度。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 16;13(18):4106. doi: 10.3390/ma13184106.
5
Bracket bonding to polymethylmethacrylate-based materials for computer-aided design/manufacture of temporary restorations: Influence of mechanical treatment and chemical treatment with universal adhesives.用于计算机辅助设计/制造临时修复体的基于聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯材料的托槽粘结:通用粘结剂的机械处理和化学处理的影响
Korean J Orthod. 2019 Nov;49(6):404-412. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.6.404. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
6
The critical bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to dental glass-ceramics.正畸托槽与牙科玻璃陶瓷的临界粘结强度。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Dec;23(12):4345-4353. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02881-5. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
7
Effect of two different primers on the shear bond strength of metallic brackets to zirconia ceramic.两种不同底涂剂对金属托槽与氧化锆陶瓷粘结强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0740-6.
8
Biomechanical evaluation between orthodontic attachment and three different materials after various surface treatments: .正畸附件与三种不同材料在经过不同表面处理后的生物力学评估: 。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Sep;89(5):742-750. doi: 10.2319/072918-547.1. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
9
Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns.不同表面处理和粘结方式对金属正畸托槽与全瓷氧化锆冠之间剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Orthod Sci. 2018 Nov 15;7:23. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_154_17. eCollection 2018.
10
Shear bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces using a universal bonding resin.使用通用粘结树脂时金属托槽与陶瓷表面的剪切粘结强度。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Aug 1;10(8):e739-e745. doi: 10.4317/jced.54175. eCollection 2018 Aug.