• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物补片用于腹壁疝修补的效果:Permacol™与Strattice™对比

Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol™ versus Strattice™.

作者信息

Cheng Amy W, Abbas Maher A, Tejirian Talar

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):999-1002.

PMID:25264647
Abstract

The use of biologic mesh in abdominal wall operations has gained popularity despite a paucity of outcome data. Numerous biologic products are available with virtually no clinical comparison studies. A retrospective study was conducted to compare patients who underwent abdominal wall hernia repair with Permacol™ (crosslinked porcine dermis) and Strattice™ (noncrosslinked porcine dermis). Of 270 reviewed patients, 195 were implanted with Permacol™ and 75 with Strattice™. Ventral hernia repairs comprised the majority (85% for Permacol, 97% for Strattice™). Postoperative infection rate was lower in the Strattice™ group (5 vs 21%, P < 0.01). In the Permacol™ group only, the overall complication rates were significantly higher in patients with infected versus clean wounds (55 vs 35%, P < 0.05) and in obese patients (body mass index 40 kg/m(2) or greater [57 vs 34%], P < 0.01). Short-term complication and recurrence rates were higher when mesh was used as a fascial bridge: 51 versus 28 per cent for Permacol™, 58 versus 20 per cent for Strattice™. The hernia recurrence was similar in both groups. In this review of patients undergoing abdominal hernia repair with biologic mesh, Strattice™ mesh was associated with a lower short-term complication rate compared with Permacol™, but the hernia recurrence rate was similar.

摘要

尽管缺乏疗效数据,但生物补片在腹壁手术中的应用已越来越普遍。有多种生物产品可供使用,但几乎没有临床对比研究。本研究进行了一项回顾性研究,比较接受腹壁疝修补术并使用Permacol™(交联猪真皮)和Strattice™(非交联猪真皮)的患者。在270例接受评估的患者中,195例植入Permacol™,75例植入Strattice™。腹疝修补术占大多数(Permacol为85%,Strattice™为97%)。Strattice™组的术后感染率较低(5%对21%,P<0.01)。仅在Permacol™组中,感染伤口患者的总体并发症发生率显著高于清洁伤口患者(55%对35%,P<0.05),肥胖患者(体重指数40kg/m²或更高[57%对34%],P<0.01)也是如此。当补片用作筋膜桥时,短期并发症和复发率较高:Permacol™为51%对28%,Strattice™为58%对20%。两组的疝复发率相似。在这项对使用生物补片进行腹疝修补术患者的回顾性研究中,与Permacol™相比,Strattice™补片的短期并发症发生率较低,但疝复发率相似。

相似文献

1
Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol™ versus Strattice™.生物补片用于腹壁疝修补的效果:Permacol™与Strattice™对比
Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):999-1002.
2
Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with Permacol™ biologic mesh.使用Permacol™生物补片进行腹壁疝修补的结果
Am Surg. 2013 Oct;79(10):992-6.
3
A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair.一项回顾性研究评估 Permacol™ 外科植入物在切口疝和腹疝修复中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
4
Hospital wide porcine mesh conversion results in cost savings with equivalent clinical outcomes.全院范围内的猪网片转换可节省成本,同时临床结果相当。
Am J Surg. 2017 Jun;213(6):1042-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
5
Single institutional experience using biological mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction.单机构使用生物补片进行腹壁重建的经验。
Am J Surg. 2014 Sep;208(3):480-4; discussion 483-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.020. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
6
Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair.生物补片用于清洁-污染和污染性腹疝修补术中腹壁重建的疗效分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;75(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000030.
7
Comparison of Permacol™ and Strattice™ for the repair of abdominal wall defects.Permacol™ 与 Strattice™ 修复腹壁缺损的比较。
Hernia. 2011 Jun;15(3):315-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0777-6. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
8
Characteristics of different mesh types for abdominal wall repair in an experimental model of peritonitis.不同网片类型在腹膜炎实验模型中用于腹壁修复的特点。
Br J Surg. 2017 Dec;104(13):1884-1893. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10635. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
9
Comparative study between biologic porcine dermal meshes: risk factors of postoperative morbidity and recurrence.生物猪真皮网片的比较研究:术后发病和复发的危险因素
J Wound Care. 2016 Jun;25(6):320-5. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.6.320.
10
The use of an acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects: a European multicentre retrospective study.脱细胞猪真皮胶原蛋白植入物在复杂腹壁缺损修复中的应用:一项欧洲多中心回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Jul;19(7):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1307-4. Epub 2015 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Collagen-Based Products in Wound, Skin, and Health Care.用于伤口、皮肤及医疗保健的胶原蛋白类产品。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1177/21621918251361118.
2
Managing a large incisional hernia in an obese and immunosuppressed patient: A case report.肥胖且免疫抑制患者的大型切口疝处理:一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Mar;128:111029. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111029. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
3
Successful Closure of Post-pneumonectomy Bronchopleural Fistula With Suture Repair Reinforced With Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix (Permacol) and Hydrogel Sealant (Progel): A Case Report.
猪脱细胞真皮基质(Permacol)和水凝胶密封剂(Progel)加固缝合成功闭合肺切除术后支气管胸膜瘘:一例报告
Cureus. 2022 Aug 29;14(8):e28529. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28529. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Construction and properties of the silk fibroin and polypropylene composite biological mesh for abdominal incisional hernia repair.用于腹壁切口疝修补的丝素蛋白与聚丙烯复合生物网片的构建及性能
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 6;10:949917. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.949917. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparison of outcomes of ventral hernia repair using different meshes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.使用不同补片进行腹疝修补术的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1561-1571. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02652-4. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
6
Biologic Mesh in Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Selected Outcomes in 51 Studies and 6079 Patients.外科手术中的生物补片:对51项研究和6079例患者的选定结局进行的综合综述与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2021 Dec;45(12):3524-3540. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05887-3. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
7
Non-cross-linked biological mesh in complex abdominal wall hernia: a cohort study.非交联生物补片在复杂腹壁疝中的应用:一项队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 May;405(3):345-352. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01881-4. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
Biological Mesh Repair of a Large Incisional Hernia Containing a Kidney Transplant in the Presence of Inflammation.炎症状态下含肾移植的大型切口疝的生物补片修复术
Case Rep Transplant. 2020 Mar 24;2020:5675613. doi: 10.1155/2020/5675613. eCollection 2020.
9
Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials and Their Influence Upon Cell Behavior.基于细胞外基质的生物材料及其对细胞行为的影响。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Jul;48(7):2132-2153. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02408-9. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
10
Acellular Dermal Matrices: Applications in Plastic Surgery.脱细胞真皮基质:在整形外科中的应用。
Semin Plast Surg. 2019 Aug;33(3):173-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693019. Epub 2019 Aug 2.