• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项回顾性研究评估 Permacol™ 外科植入物在切口疝和腹疝修复中的应用。

A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair.

机构信息

Loyola University, 2160 South First Ave., Maywood, IL 60153, USA.

Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, UPC I, Suite 3100, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.025
PMID:24508570
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The outcome of incisional and ventral hernia repair depends on surgical technique, patient, and material. Permacol™ surgical implant (crosslinked porcine collagen) has been used for over a decade; however, there are few data on outcomes. This study is the largest retrospective multinational study to date to evaluate outcomes with Permacol™ surgical implant in the repair of incisional and ventral hernias.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively on 343 patients treated for 213 incisional and 130 ventral hernias. Data evaluated included patient demographics, wound classification, surgical technique, morbidity, and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 649 days (max: 2857), median age 57 years (range 23-91), and BMI 32 kg/m(2) (range 17.6-77.8). Two or more comorbidities were present in 70% of patients. Open surgery was performed in 220 (64%) patients. Permacol™ surgical implant was used as an underlay (250), sublay (39), onlay (37), or inlay (17). Surgical techniques included component separation (89; 25.9%), modified Stoppa technique (197; 57.4%), and Rives-Stoppa (17; 5.0%). CDC Surgical Wound Classification was Class I (190), Class II (103), Class III (28), and Class IV (22). Complications were seen in 40.5% (139) of the patients, with seroma (19%) and wound infection (15%) as the most common. Mesh removal occurred in 1 (0.3%) patient. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the probabilities for hernia recurrence at one, two, and three years were 5.8%, 16.6%, and 31.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Permacol™ surgical implant was shown to be safe with relatively low rates of hernia recurrence.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01214252 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

摘要

背景

切口疝和腹疝修补的结果取决于手术技术、患者和材料。Permacol™ 外科植入物(交联猪胶原蛋白)已使用了十余年;然而,关于其结果的数据却很少。本研究是迄今为止评估 Permacol™ 外科植入物在治疗切口疝和腹疝中的应用的最大的回顾性多国研究。

方法

对 343 例接受 213 例切口疝和 130 例腹疝治疗的患者进行了回顾性数据收集。评估的数据包括患者人口统计学、伤口分类、手术技术、发病率和复发率。

结果

中位随访时间为 649 天(最长 2857 天),中位年龄为 57 岁(范围 23-91 岁),BMI 为 32kg/m²(范围 17.6-77.8)。70%的患者存在两种或两种以上合并症。220 例(64%)患者接受了开放手术。Permacol™ 外科植入物作为底层(250 例)、中层(39 例)、上层(37 例)或衬里(17 例)使用。手术技术包括分离组件(89 例,25.9%)、改良 Stoppa 技术(197 例,57.4%)和 Rives-Stoppa(17 例,5.0%)。CDC 外科伤口分类为 I 类(190 例)、II 类(103 例)、III 类(28 例)和 IV 类(22 例)。40.5%(139 例)的患者出现并发症,最常见的是血清肿(19%)和伤口感染(15%)。1 例(0.3%)患者行网片取出术。Kaplan-Meier 分析表明,术后 1、2、3 年疝复发的概率分别为 5.8%、16.6%和 31.0%。

结论

Permacol™ 外科植入物安全,疝复发率相对较低。

临床试验注册号

NCT01214252(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。

相似文献

1
A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair.一项回顾性研究评估 Permacol™ 外科植入物在切口疝和腹疝修复中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
2
Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol™ versus Strattice™.生物补片用于腹壁疝修补的效果:Permacol™与Strattice™对比
Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):999-1002.
3
The use of an acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects: a European multicentre retrospective study.脱细胞猪真皮胶原蛋白植入物在复杂腹壁缺损修复中的应用:一项欧洲多中心回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Jul;19(7):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1307-4. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
4
Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with Permacol™ biologic mesh.使用Permacol™生物补片进行腹壁疝修补的结果
Am Surg. 2013 Oct;79(10):992-6.
5
Compound repair of intraperitoneal onlay mesh associated with the sublay technique for giant lower ventral hernia.巨大下腹壁疝腹膜前补片复合修补联合肌后间隙技术
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Aug;69(2):192-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182250dfb.
6
Modified Rives-Stoppa technique for repair of complex incisional hernias in 59 patients.改良Rives-Stoppa技术修复59例复杂切口疝
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Feb;68(2):190-3. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318212f380.
7
Comparative study between biologic porcine dermal meshes: risk factors of postoperative morbidity and recurrence.生物猪真皮网片的比较研究:术后发病和复发的危险因素
J Wound Care. 2016 Jun;25(6):320-5. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.6.320.
8
Long term results of open complex abdominal wall hernia repair with self-gripping mesh: A retrospective cohort study.开放式复杂腹壁疝修补术采用自固网片的长期疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Aug;44:255-259. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.029. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
9
Evaluation of high-risk, comorbid patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh.评估使用合成网片行开放型腹侧疝修补术的高危、合并症患者。
Surgery. 2013 Jan;153(1):120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
10
Sublay versus underlay in open ventral hernia repair.开放腹疝修补术中的腹膜前修补法与腹膜下修补法对比
J Surg Res. 2016 May 1;202(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Collagen-Based Products in Wound, Skin, and Health Care.用于伤口、皮肤及医疗保健的胶原蛋白类产品。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1177/21621918251361118.
2
Recent Progress in Development of Dressings Used for Diabetic Wounds with Special Emphasis on Scaffolds.近期糖尿病创面敷料的研究进展,特别强调了支架的应用。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 4;2022:1659338. doi: 10.1155/2022/1659338. eCollection 2022.
3
Identifying predictors of ventral hernia recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis.识别腹疝复发的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa071.
4
Non-Cross-Linked Collagen Mesh Performs Best in a Physiologic, Noncontaminated Rat Model.非交联胶原网在生理、无污染大鼠模型中表现最佳。
Surg Innov. 2019 Jun;26(3):302-311. doi: 10.1177/1553350619833291. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
5
Systematic review of the stage of innovation of biological mesh for complex or contaminated abdominal wall closure.生物补片用于复杂或污染腹壁闭合创新阶段的系统评价
BJS Open. 2018 Jun 14;2(6):371-380. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.78. eCollection 2018 Dec.
6
The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: WSES guidelines.创伤和非创伤患者的开放性腹部:WSES 指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Feb 2;13:7. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0167-4. eCollection 2018.
7
What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction?在腹壁重建中使用生物或生物合成补片的证据有哪些?
Hernia. 2018 Apr;22(2):249-269. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1735-y. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Single-center ventral hernia repair with porcine dermis collagen implant.单中心腹疝修补术联合猪真皮胶原植入物。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1820-1827. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5866-5. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
9
The role of open abdomen in non-trauma patient: WSES Consensus Paper.非创伤患者应用开放性腹部的作用:WSES 共识文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Aug 14;12:39. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0146-1. eCollection 2017.
10
Corrective Rhinoplasty with Combined Use of Autogenous Auricular Cartilage and Porcine Dermal Collagen in Cleft Lip Nose Deformity.自体耳软骨与猪真皮胶原蛋白联合应用于唇裂鼻畸形矫正鼻整形术
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep;36(5):230-6. doi: 10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.5.230. Epub 2014 Sep 30.