• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Permacol™生物补片进行腹壁疝修补的结果

Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with Permacol™ biologic mesh.

作者信息

Cheng Amy W, Abbas Maher A, Tejirian Talar

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2013 Oct;79(10):992-6.

PMID:24160785
Abstract

The use of biologic mesh in abdominal wall operations has gained popularity despite a paucity of outcome data. We aimed to review the experience of a large healthcare organization with Permacol™. A retrospective study was conducted of patients who underwent abdominal hernia repair with Permacol™ in 14 Southern California hospitals. One hundred ninety-five patients were analyzed over a 4-year period. Operations included ventral/incisional hernia repairs, ostomy closures, parastomal hernia repairs, and inguinal hernia repairs. In 50 per cent of the patients, Permacol™ was used to reinforce a primary fascial repair and in 50 per cent as a fascial bridge. The overall complication rate was 39.5 per cent. The complication rate was higher in patients with infected versus clean wounds, body mass index (BMI) 40 kg/m(2) or greater versus BMI less than 40 kg/m(2), in patients with prior mesh repair, and when mesh was used as a fascial bridge. With a mean follow-up of 2.1 years, morbid obesity was associated with a higher recurrence. To date this is the largest study on the use of Permacol™ in abdominal wall hernia repair. In our patient population undergoing heterogeneous operations with a majority of wounds as Class II or higher, use of Permacol™ did not eliminate wound morbidity or prevent recurrence, especially in morbidly obese patients.

摘要

尽管缺乏疗效数据,但生物补片在腹壁手术中的应用已越来越普遍。我们旨在回顾一家大型医疗机构使用Permacol™的经验。对在南加州14家医院接受Permacol™腹壁疝修补术的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。在4年期间对195例患者进行了分析。手术包括腹侧/切口疝修补术、造口关闭术、造口旁疝修补术和腹股沟疝修补术。50%的患者使用Permacol™加强初次筋膜修复,50%作为筋膜桥。总体并发症发生率为39.5%。感染伤口患者的并发症发生率高于清洁伤口患者,体重指数(BMI)≥40kg/m²的患者高于BMI<40kg/m²的患者,既往有补片修补史的患者,以及使用补片作为筋膜桥时。平均随访2.1年,病态肥胖与较高的复发率相关。迄今为止,这是关于Permacol™在腹壁疝修补术中应用的最大规模研究。在我们接受多种手术且大多数伤口为Ⅱ类或更高等级的患者群体中,使用Permacol™并不能消除伤口并发症或预防复发,尤其是在病态肥胖患者中。

相似文献

1
Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with Permacol™ biologic mesh.使用Permacol™生物补片进行腹壁疝修补的结果
Am Surg. 2013 Oct;79(10):992-6.
2
Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol™ versus Strattice™.生物补片用于腹壁疝修补的效果:Permacol™与Strattice™对比
Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):999-1002.
3
A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair.一项回顾性研究评估 Permacol™ 外科植入物在切口疝和腹疝修复中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
4
Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.原发性筋膜闭合联合网片加强在腹壁重建中优于桥接网片修复。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
5
A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh.利用生物补片进行一期修复感染和污染的腹壁缺损的 5 年临床经验。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):991-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182849871.
6
Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair.生物补片用于清洁-污染和污染性腹疝修补术中腹壁重建的疗效分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;75(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000030.
7
The use of an acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects: a European multicentre retrospective study.脱细胞猪真皮胶原蛋白植入物在复杂腹壁缺损修复中的应用:一项欧洲多中心回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Jul;19(7):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1307-4. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
8
Inguinal Hernia Repair Using Self-adhering Sutureless Mesh: Adhesix™: A 3-Year Follow-up with Low Chronic Pain and Recurrence Rate.使用自粘无缝合补片(Adhesix™)进行腹股沟疝修补术:三年随访,慢性疼痛发生率低且复发率低
Am Surg. 2016 Feb;82(2):112-6.
9
Use of human acellular dermal matrix for hernia repair: friend or foe?人脱细胞真皮基质在疝修补术中的应用:是福是祸?
Surgery. 2008 Oct;144(4):703-9; discussion 709-11. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.018. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
10
The partial underlay preperitoneal with panniculectomy repair for incisional abdominal hernia in the morbidly obese.病态肥胖患者切口疝的部分腹膜下前置修补术联合腹壁成形术
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 May-Jun;10(3):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Biologic Mesh in Surgery: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis of Selected Outcomes in 51 Studies and 6079 Patients.外科手术中的生物补片:对51项研究和6079例患者的选定结局进行的综合综述与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2021 Dec;45(12):3524-3540. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05887-3. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
2
A retrospective, Italian multicenter study of complex abdominal wall defect repair with a Permacol biological mesh.一项回顾性、意大利多中心研究,涉及使用 Permacol 生物网片修复复杂腹壁缺损。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 25;10(1):3367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60019-0.
3
Single-center ventral hernia repair with porcine dermis collagen implant.
单中心腹疝修补术联合猪真皮胶原植入物。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1820-1827. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5866-5. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
Biological Implant for Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Single Institution Experience and Review of Literature.用于复杂腹壁重建的生物植入物:单机构经验及文献综述
World J Surg. 2017 Oct;41(10):2492-2501. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4066-8.
5
The use of an acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects: a European multicentre retrospective study.脱细胞猪真皮胶原蛋白植入物在复杂腹壁缺损修复中的应用:一项欧洲多中心回顾性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Jul;19(7):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1307-4. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
6
Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status.猪真皮植入物在软组织重建中的现状
Biologics. 2014 Mar 10;8:83-90. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S46469. eCollection 2014.