Bergman Michael S, He Xinjian, Joseph Michael E, Zhuang Ziqing, Heimbuch Brian K, Shaffer Ronald E, Choe Melanie, Wander Joseph D
a National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(3):163-71. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2014.957832.
This study assessed the correlation of N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) fit between a Static Advanced Headform (StAH) and 10 human test subjects. Quantitative fit evaluations were performed on test subjects who made three visits to the laboratory. On each visit, one fit evaluation was performed on eight different FFRs of various model/size variations. Additionally, subject breathing patterns were recorded. Each fit evaluation comprised three two-minute exercises: "Normal Breathing," "Deep Breathing," and again "Normal Breathing." The overall test fit factors (FF) for human tests were recorded. The same respirator samples were later mounted on the StAH and the overall test manikin fit factors (MFF) were assessed utilizing the recorded human breathing patterns. Linear regression was performed on the mean log10-transformed FF and MFF values to assess the relationship between the values obtained from humans and the StAH. This is the first study to report a positive correlation of respirator fit between a headform and test subjects. The linear regression by respirator resulted in R(2) = 0.95, indicating a strong linear correlation between FF and MFF. For all respirators the geometric mean (GM) FF values were consistently higher than those of the GM MFF. For 50% of respirators, GM FF and GM MFF values were significantly different between humans and the StAH. For data grouped by subject/respirator combinations, the linear regression resulted in R(2) = 0.49. A weaker correlation (R(2) = 0.11) was found using only data paired by subject/respirator combination where both the test subject and StAH had passed a real-time leak check before performing the fit evaluation. For six respirators, the difference in passing rates between the StAH and humans was < 20%, while two respirators showed a difference of 29% and 43%. For data by test subject, GM FF and GM MFF values were significantly different for 40% of the subjects. Overall, the advanced headform system has potential for assessing fit for some N95 FFR model/sizes.
本研究评估了静态高级头模(StAH)与10名人体测试对象之间N95过滤式面罩呼吸器(FFR)贴合度的相关性。对三次到访实验室的测试对象进行了定量贴合度评估。每次到访时,对八种不同型号/尺寸变体的FFR进行一次贴合度评估。此外,还记录了测试对象的呼吸模式。每次贴合度评估包括三个两分钟的练习:“正常呼吸”、“深呼吸”,然后再次“正常呼吸”。记录了人体测试的总体测试贴合因子(FF)。随后将相同的呼吸器样本安装在StAH上,并利用记录的人体呼吸模式评估总体测试人体模型贴合因子(MFF)。对平均对数转换后的FF和MFF值进行线性回归,以评估从人体和StAH获得的值之间的关系。这是第一项报告头模与测试对象之间呼吸器贴合度呈正相关的研究。按呼吸器进行的线性回归得出R(2) = 0.95,表明FF和MFF之间存在很强的线性相关性。对于所有呼吸器,几何平均(GM)FF值始终高于GM MFF值。对于50%的呼吸器,人体和StAH之间的GM FF和GM MFF值存在显著差异。对于按受试者/呼吸器组合分组的数据,线性回归得出R(2) = 0.49。仅使用在进行贴合度评估前测试对象和StAH均通过实时泄漏检查的受试者/呼吸器组合配对的数据时,发现相关性较弱(R(2) = 0.11)。对于六种呼吸器,StAH和人体之间的通过率差异<20%,而两种呼吸器的差异分别为29%和43%。对于按测试对象的数据,40%的受试者的GM FF和GM MFF值存在显著差异。总体而言,高级头模系统在评估某些N95 FFR型号/尺寸的贴合度方面具有潜力。