Kilday John-Paul, Laughlin Suzanne, Urbach Stacey, Bouffet Eric, Bartels Ute
Department of Haematology/Oncology (Children's Brain Tumour Research Network), Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M13 9WL, UK,
J Neurooncol. 2015 Jan;121(1):167-75. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1619-7. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
The pituitary bright spot is acknowledged to indicate functional integrity of the posterior pituitary gland, whilst its absence supports a diagnosis of central diabetes insipidus (DI). This feature was evaluated, together with the incidence and clinical characteristics of DI in children with suprasellar/neurohypophyseal germinomas. We performed a review of all suprasellar (SS) or bifocal (BF) germinoma pediatric patients treated in Toronto since 2000. Demographics, symptomatology, treatment outcome and imaging were evaluated. Nineteen patients fulfilled inclusion criteria (10 SS, 9 BF; median age 12.5 years (6.2-16.8 years)). All remained alive at 6.4 years median follow-up (1.2-13.7 years) after receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy (13 focal/ventricular, four whole brain, two neuraxis), with only one progression. All had symptoms of DI at presentation with a symptom interval above one year in eight cases (42 %). Desmopressin was commenced and maintained in 16 patients (84 %). The pituitary bright spot was lost in most diagnostic interpretable cases, but was appreciated in three patients (18 %) who had normal serum sodium values compared to 'absent' cases (p = 0.013). For two such cases, spots remained visible until last follow-up (range 0.4-3.3 years), with one still receiving desmopressin. No case of bright spot recovery was observed following therapy. Protracted symptom intervals for germinoma-induced central DI may reflect poor clinical awareness. Explanations for persistence of the pituitary bright spot in symptomatic patients remain elusive. Desmopressin seldom reverses the clinical features of germinoma-induced DI to allow discontinuation, nor does treatment cause bright spot recovery.
垂体亮点被认为可指示垂体后叶的功能完整性,而其缺失则支持中枢性尿崩症(DI)的诊断。我们评估了这一特征,以及鞍上/神经垂体生殖细胞瘤患儿中DI的发生率和临床特征。我们回顾了自2000年以来在多伦多接受治疗的所有鞍上(SS)或双灶性(BF)生殖细胞瘤儿科患者。评估了人口统计学、症状学、治疗结果和影像学。19名患者符合纳入标准(10例SS,9例BF;中位年龄12.5岁(6.2 - 16.8岁))。在接受化疗和放疗(13例局部/脑室放疗,4例全脑放疗,2例全脊髓放疗)后,所有患者在中位随访6.4年(1.2 - 13.7年)时均存活,仅有1例进展。所有患者在就诊时均有DI症状,其中8例(42%)症状持续时间超过1年。16例患者(84%)开始并持续使用去氨加压素。在大多数可进行诊断性解读的病例中垂体亮点消失,但在3例血清钠值正常的患者中可见(18%),与“消失”的病例相比(p = 0.013)。对于其中2例这样的病例,亮点一直可见直至最后随访(范围0.4 - 3.3年),其中1例仍在使用去氨加压素。治疗后未观察到亮点恢复的病例。生殖细胞瘤所致中枢性DI的症状持续时间延长可能反映临床意识不足。有症状患者垂体亮点持续存在的原因仍不清楚。去氨加压素很少能逆转生殖细胞瘤所致DI的临床特征以允许停药,治疗也不会使亮点恢复。