Rosenblau Gabriela, Kliemann Dorit, Heekeren Hauke R, Dziobek Isabel
Cluster of Excellence 'Languages of Emotion', Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195, Berlin, Germany,
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Apr;45(4):953-65. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2249-9.
Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been proposed to show greater impairments in implicit than explicit mentalizing. To test this proposition, we developed two comparable naturalistic tasks for a performance-based approximation of implicit and explicit mentalizing in 28 individuals with ASD and 23 matched typically developed (TD) participants. Although both tasks were sensitive to the social impairments of individuals with ASD, implicit mentalizing was not more dysfunctional than explicit mentalizing. In TD participants, performance on the tasks did not correlate with each other, whereas in individuals with ASD they were highly correlated. These findings suggest that implicit and explicit mentalizing processes are separable in typical development. In contrast, in individuals with ASD implicit and explicit mentalizing processes are similarly impaired and closely linked suggesting a lack of developmental specification of these processes in ASD.
有人提出,患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的个体在隐性心理理论方面的损伤比显性心理理论更大。为了验证这一观点,我们开发了两个类似的自然主义任务,用于对28名患有ASD的个体和23名匹配的发育正常(TD)参与者的隐性和显性心理理论进行基于表现的近似评估。尽管两项任务都对患有ASD的个体的社交损伤敏感,但隐性心理理论并不比显性心理理论功能更失调。在TD参与者中,任务表现彼此不相关,而在患有ASD的个体中,它们高度相关。这些发现表明,在典型发育中,隐性和显性心理理论过程是可分离的。相比之下,患有ASD的个体的隐性和显性心理理论过程同样受损且紧密相连,这表明这些过程在ASD中缺乏发育特异性。