Ahmed Shah Newaz, Jhaj Ratinder, Sadasivam Balakrishnan, Joshi Rajnish
Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Department of General Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Discoveries (Craiova). 2020 Sep 30;8(3):e115. doi: 10.15190/d.2020.12.
The American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association 2017 and European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension 2018 guidelines were a paradigm shift in hypertension management in contemporary medicine. Lowering of blood pressure to less than 130 (systolic) and 80 (diastolic) mm of Hg irrespective of cardiovascular risk is recommended. While intensive blood pressure control is commonly achievable with rational pharmacotherapy, the magnitude of left ventricular hypertrophy regression is an independent factor in improvement in cardiovascular health. The regression of left ventricular hypertrophy has been adjudged as a clinically useful surrogate marker that reflects the efficacy of hypertension treatment. Though angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/ angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) are the preferred initial drug for greater regression of left ventricular mass, the choice of add-on therapy, if required, is still debatable. Therefore, in our observational study, we sought to compare the reduction in left ventricular mass index in hypertensives with left ventricular hypertrophy on standard ACEI/ARB based drug therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort (n=217) comprised of patients with uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure>140/90 mm of Hg) and left ventricular hypertrophy (left ventricular mass index>115 and 95 gram/square meter in males and females respectively). The add-on drug in ACEI/ARB therapy was either thiazide diuretics (TD) or calcium channel blockers (CCB). Four sub-cohorts were constituted: mono-therapy - group A (n=70, ACEI/ARB), dual-therapy - group B (n=48, ACEI/ARB+TD) and group C (n=51, ACEI/ ARB+CCB), triple therapy - group D (n=48, ACEI/ ARB+TD+CCB). Left ventricular mass index was determined using echocardiography at baseline and after 24 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline clinical or demographic variables between group B and group C. Baseline blood pressure and duration of hypertension was greater in group D compared to group A (P<0.001). The reduction in left ventricular mass index (mean ±SD) in the four groups (A to D) was 16.7±18.7, 21.0±20.8, 20.5±15.5 and 29.1±21.5 g/m2 respectively (D>A, P=0.011, B versus C, P=1.00). The corresponding change in blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) was 18.5±13.6/8.9±11.2, 27.5±19.2/12.2±9.3, 23.4±16.7/ 5.4±10.1, 26.6±19.5/10.7±12.8 mm of Hg respectively (systolic, B>A, P=0.027, D>A, P=0.048) (diastolic, B>C, P=0.013). CONCLUSION: Anti-hypertensive treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers-based therapy produced graded regression of left ventricular hypertrophy with monotherapy, dual therapy and triple therapy. In dual therapy, add-on of either thiazide diuretics or calcium channel blockers to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers showed equal efficacy in regression of left ventricular hypertrophy independent of blood pressure reduction.
美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会2017年以及欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会2018年的指南代表了当代医学中高血压管理的范式转变。建议将血压降至收缩压低于130毫米汞柱和舒张压低于80毫米汞柱,而不考虑心血管风险。虽然通过合理的药物治疗通常可以实现强化血压控制,但左心室肥厚消退的程度是改善心血管健康的一个独立因素。左心室肥厚的消退已被判定为反映高血压治疗效果的一个临床上有用的替代指标。尽管血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACEI/ARB)是使左心室质量更大程度消退的首选初始药物,但如需联合治疗,其选择仍存在争议。因此,在我们的观察性研究中,我们试图比较在基于标准ACEI/ARB药物治疗的情况下,高血压合并左心室肥厚患者左心室质量指数的降低情况。
该队列(n = 217)由血压控制不佳(血压>140/90毫米汞柱)且有左心室肥厚(男性和女性的左心室质量指数分别>115和95克/平方米)的患者组成。ACEI/ARB治疗中的联合用药为噻嗪类利尿剂(TD)或钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)。组成了四个亚组:单药治疗 - A组(n = 70,ACEI/ARB)、联合治疗 - B组(n = 48,ACEI/ARB + TD)和C组(n = 51,ACEI/ARB + CCB)、三联治疗 - D组(n = 48,ACEI/ARB + TD + CCB)。在基线和治疗24周后使用超声心动图测定左心室质量指数。
B组和C组之间在基线临床或人口统计学变量上无显著差异。与A组相比,D组的基线血压和高血压病程更长(P<0.001)。四组(A至D)左心室质量指数(均值±标准差)的降低分别为16.7±18.7、21.0±20.8、20.5±15.5和29.1±21.5克/平方米(D>A,P = 0.011,B与C相比,P = 1.00)。相应的血压(收缩压/舒张压)变化分别为18.5±13.6/8.9±11.2、27.5±19.2/12.2±9.3、23.4±16.7/5.4±10.1、26.6±19.5/10.7±12.8毫米汞柱(收缩压,B>A,P = 0.027,D>A,P = 0.048)(舒张压,B>C,P = 0.013)。
基于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的抗高血压治疗通过单药治疗、联合治疗和三联治疗使左心室肥厚呈分级消退。在联合治疗中,在血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂基础上加用噻嗪类利尿剂或钙通道阻滞剂在左心室肥厚消退方面显示出同等疗效,且与血压降低无关。