• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管成形术失败后的急诊冠状动脉搭桥术:危险因素与预后

Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting for failed angioplasty: risk factors and outcome.

作者信息

Naunheim K S, Fiore A C, Fagan D C, McBride L R, Barner H B, Pennington D G, Willman V L, Kern M J, Deligonul U, Vandormael M C

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Louis University Medical Center, Missouri 63110-0250.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1989 Jun;47(6):816-22; discussion 822-3. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(89)90010-6.

DOI:10.1016/0003-4975(89)90010-6
PMID:2527016
Abstract

It has been suggested that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed in the setting of emergent failure of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty causes minimal increased risk compared with routine CABG. We reviewed the records of 103 patients undergoing emergency CABG for failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (group 1) and compared them with an identical number of consecutive CABG patients from 1987 (group 2). Group 1 had a lower risk profile evidenced by lower mean age (p less than 0.01), fewer diseased vessels (p less than 0.0001), better ventricular function (p less than 0.001), fewer left main lesions (p less than 0.0001), and fewer patients with acute ischemia requiring intravenous administration of nitroglycerin (p less than 0.01). Despite these differences, the group 1 patients had a higher mortality rate (11% versus 1%; p less than 0.01) and a higher rate of perioperative infarctions (new Q wave) (22% versus 6%; p less than 0.01). An analysis of risk factors was performed in the group 1 patients using 36 preoperative and operative variables. Multivariate analysis revealed that left ventricular score (p less than 0.0001), preoperative (after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) need for inotropic support (p less than 0.005), and age (p less than 0.025) were independent predictors of operative mortality. In conclusion, emergency CABG after failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty carries a significantly greater risk of operative death and perioperative infarction than elective CABG.

摘要

有人提出,在经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术紧急失败的情况下进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与常规CABG相比,增加的风险最小。我们回顾了103例因经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术失败而接受急诊CABG的患者(第1组)的记录,并将其与1987年相同数量的连续CABG患者(第2组)进行比较。第1组的风险特征较低,表现为平均年龄较低(p<0.01)、病变血管较少(p<0.0001)、心室功能较好(p<0.001)、左主干病变较少(p<0.0001)以及需要静脉注射硝酸甘油的急性缺血患者较少(p<0.01)。尽管存在这些差异,第1组患者的死亡率较高(11%对1%;p<0.01),围手术期梗死率(新Q波)也较高(22%对6%;p<0.01)。使用36个术前和手术变量对第1组患者进行了危险因素分析。多变量分析显示,左心室评分(p<0.0001)、术前(经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术后)对正性肌力支持的需求(p<0.005)和年龄(p<0.025)是手术死亡率的独立预测因素。总之,经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术失败后进行急诊CABG的手术死亡和围手术期梗死风险明显高于择期CABG。

相似文献

1
Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting for failed angioplasty: risk factors and outcome.血管成形术失败后的急诊冠状动脉搭桥术:危险因素与预后
Ann Thorac Surg. 1989 Jun;47(6):816-22; discussion 822-3. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(89)90010-6.
2
Coronary bypass grafting after failed elective and failed emergent percutaneous angioplasty. Relative risks of emergent surgical intervention.择期经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术及急诊经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术失败后的冠状动脉搭桥术。急诊手术干预的相对风险。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988 May;95(5):761-72.
3
Risk analysis of operative intervention for failed coronary angioplasty.冠状动脉血管成形术失败后手术干预的风险分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 1992 Nov;54(5):884-90; discussion 890-1. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)90641-g.
4
Coronary artery bypass surgery after failed elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A status report.择期经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术失败后的冠状动脉搭桥手术。一份现状报告。
Circulation. 1989 Jun;79(6 Pt 2):I126-31.
5
Impact of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty on coronary bypass surgery--changes in the patient profile during the past decade.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术对冠状动脉搭桥手术的影响——过去十年患者情况的变化
Jpn Circ J. 1998 Sep;62(9):665-9. doi: 10.1253/jcj.62.665.
6
Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary angioplasty. A 10-year experience.经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术失败后的急诊冠状动脉搭桥手术:十年经验
Ann Surg. 1992 May;215(5):425-33; discussion 433-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199205000-00004.
7
Angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass in octogenarians.八旬老人的血管成形术与冠状动脉搭桥术对比
Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Nov;58(5):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91927-5.
8
Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era.
Circulation. 2002 Oct 29;106(18):2346-50. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000036595.92742.69.
9
Factors influencing mortality after emergency coronary artery bypass grafting for failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术失败后急诊冠状动脉旁路移植术患者死亡的影响因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Dec;64(6):1747-52. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00997-1.
10
Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery.冠状动脉成形术与再次冠状动脉旁路移植术用于曾接受旁路手术的患者
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1;28(5):1140-6. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00286-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical revascularization for acute coronary syndrome: comparative surgical and long-term results.
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Mar;54(3):95-102. doi: 10.1007/BF02744870.
2
Heart transplantation after emergency coronary artery bypass for failed angioplasty.血管成形术失败后急诊冠状动脉搭桥术后的心脏移植。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1992;19(4):300-3.
3
Emergency surgical revascularisation for coronary angioplasty complications.冠状动脉成形术并发症的急诊手术血管重建术
Br Heart J. 1994 Nov;72(5):428-35. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.5.428.
4
Clinical experience of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting following failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术失败后急诊冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床经验
Jpn J Surg. 1991 Nov;21(6):643-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02471049.
5
Coronary angioplasty in the United Kingdom. Report of a Working Party of the British Cardiac Society.英国的冠状动脉血管成形术。英国心脏学会一个工作小组的报告。
Br Heart J. 1991 Oct;66(4):325-31. doi: 10.1136/hrt.66.4.325.