Villaruz Liza C, Socinski Mark A, Abberbock Shira, Berry Lynne D, Johnson Bruce E, Kwiatkowski David J, Iafrate A John, Varella-Garcia Marileila, Franklin Wilbur A, Camidge D Ross, Sequist Lecia V, Haura Eric B, Ladanyi Mark, Kurland Brenda F, Kugler Kelly, Minna John D, Bunn Paul A, Kris Mark G
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cancer. 2015 Feb 1;121(3):448-56. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29042. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
The advent of effective targeted therapy for BRAF(V600E) -mutant lung adenocarcinomas necessitates further exploration of the unique clinical features and behavior of advanced-stage BRAF-mutant lung adenocarcinomas.
Data were reviewed for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas enrolled in the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium whose tumors underwent testing for mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), AKT1, BRAF, dual-specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1), neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS), and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit α (PIK3CA); for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations; and for MET amplification.
Twenty-one BRAF mutations were identified in 951 patients with adenocarcinomas (2.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4%-3.4%): 17 (81%; 95% CI, 60%-92%) were BRAF(V600E) mutations, and 4 were non-BRAF(V600E) mutations. Among the 733 cases tested for all 10 genes, BRAF mutations were more likely to occur than most other genotypic abnormalities in current or former smokers (BRAF vs sensitizing EGFR, 82% vs 36%, mid-P < .001; BRAF vs ALK, 39%, mid-P = .003; BRAF vs other mutations, 49%, mid-P = .02; BRAF vs patients with more than 1 oncogenic driver [doubleton], 46%, mid-P = .04.) The double-mutation rate was 16% among patients with BRAF mutations but 5% among patients with other genomic abnormalities (mid-P = .045). Differences were not found in survival between patients with BRAF mutations and those with other genomic abnormalities (P > .20).
BRAF mutations occurred in 2.2% of advanced-stage lung adenocarcinomas, were most commonly V600E, and were associated with distinct clinicopathologic features in comparison with other genomic subtypes and with a high mutation rate in more than 1 gene. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive genomic profiling in assessing patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas.
针对BRAF(V600E)突变型肺腺癌的有效靶向治疗的出现,使得有必要进一步探索晚期BRAF突变型肺腺癌的独特临床特征和行为。
回顾了肺癌突变联盟登记的晚期肺腺癌患者的数据,这些患者的肿瘤接受了表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、 Kirsten大鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物(KRAS)、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)、AKT1、BRAF、双特异性丝裂原活化蛋白激酶激酶1(MEK1)、神经母细胞瘤RAS病毒(v-ras)癌基因同源物(NRAS)和磷脂酰肌醇-4,5-二磷酸3-激酶催化亚基α(PIK3CA)突变检测;间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)易位检测;以及MET扩增检测。
在951例腺癌患者中鉴定出21例BRAF突变(2.2%;95%置信区间[CI],1.4%-3.4%):17例(81%;95%CI,60%-92%)为BRAF(V600E)突变,4例为非BRAF(V600E)突变。在对所有10个基因进行检测的733例病例中,与当前或既往吸烟者中的大多数其他基因型异常相比,BRAF突变更易发生(BRAF与敏感型EGFR,82%对36%,中位数P<0.001;BRAF与ALK,39%,中位数P=0.003;BRAF与其他突变,49%,中位数P=0.02;BRAF与具有超过1个致癌驱动基因的患者[双基因],46%,中位数P=0.04)。BRAF突变患者的双突变率为16%,而其他基因组异常患者的双突变率为5%(中位数P=0.045)。BRAF突变患者与其他基因组异常患者的生存率未发现差异(P>0.20)。
BRAF突变发生在2.2%的晚期肺腺癌中,最常见的是V600E,与其他基因组亚型相比具有独特的临床病理特征,且在超过1个基因中有较高的突变率。这些发现强调了全面基因组分析在评估晚期肺腺癌患者中的重要性。