Brisson G R, Boisvert P, Péronnet F, Quirion A, Senécal L
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS-Santé), Pointe-Claire Québec, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;58(8):816-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02332212.
This study was designed to verify if the decrease in blood prolactin (PRL) induced by selective face cooling during exercise could be part of a response to specific body thermal stress. Five healthy trained male cyclists presenting a significant plasma PRL elevation to exercise were, on three occasions and at weekly interval, submitted to a submaximal exercise (approx. 65% VO2max) on ergocycle with and without selective face cooling. In absence of face cooling a first trial served to establish reference values for workload, heart rate and plasma PRL levels, the latter increasing markedly (450% of resting values) in these conditions. On a second trial but with workload maintained at reference values (222 +/- 9 W), a significant bradycardia was observed with face cooling; furthermore, plasma PRL response to exercise was significantly reduced (to 31% of original response). On a third trial with face cooling, workload had to be significantly augmented (242 +/- 10 W) to maintain heart rate at reference level (78% HRmax); in addition, plasma PRL response to exercise was almost unchanged compared to the reference-value level. The absence of a significant face cooling-induced decrease in sympathetic tonus, as evaluated through peripheral plasma catecholamines response, does not indicate a role for the autonomic nervous system in the face cooling-induced reduction of both heart rate and PRL responses during exercise. Assay of circulating peripheral beta-endorphins could indicate that the face cooling-induced PRL blunted response does not necessarily involve an opioid mediation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究旨在验证运动期间选择性面部冷却引起的血催乳素(PRL)降低是否可能是对特定身体热应激反应的一部分。五名健康且经过训练的男性自行车运动员在运动时血浆PRL显著升高,他们在三个不同时间且每周一次的情况下,在有或没有选择性面部冷却的情况下,在测力计上进行次最大运动(约65%最大摄氧量)。在没有面部冷却的情况下,第一次试验用于确定工作量、心率和血浆PRL水平的参考值,在这些条件下,后者显著增加(为静息值的450%)。在第二次试验中,但工作量保持在参考值(222±9瓦),面部冷却时观察到显著的心动过缓;此外,运动时血浆PRL反应显著降低(降至原始反应的31%)。在第三次面部冷却试验中,必须显著增加工作量(242±10瓦)才能将心率维持在参考水平(78%最大心率);此外,与参考值水平相比,运动时血浆PRL反应几乎没有变化。通过外周血浆儿茶酚胺反应评估,未发现面部冷却引起的交感神经张力显著降低,这并不表明自主神经系统在运动期间面部冷却引起的心率和PRL反应降低中起作用。循环外周β-内啡肽的检测可能表明,面部冷却引起的PRL反应迟钝不一定涉及阿片类物质介导。(摘要截断于250字)