Gamst-Jensen Hejdi, Vedel Pernille Nygaard, Lindberg-Larsen Viktoria Oline, Egerod Ingrid
Department of Anesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Burns. 2014 Dec;40(8):1463-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.08.020. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
Burn patients suffer excruciating pain due to their injuries and procedures related to surgery, wound care, and mobilization. Acute Stress Disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, chronic pain and depression are highly prevalent among survivors of severe burns. Evidence-based pain management addresses and alleviates these complications. The aim of our study was to compare clinical guidelines for pain management in burn patients in selected European and non-European countries. We included pediatric guidelines due to the high rate of children in burn units.
The study had a comparative retrospective design using combined methodology of instrument appraisal and thematic analysis. Three investigators appraised guidelines from burn units in Denmark (DK), Sweden (SE), New Zealand (NZ), and USA using the AGREE Instrument (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation), version II, and identified core themes in the guidelines.
The overall scores expressing quality in six domains of the AGREE instrument were variable at 22% (DK), 44% (SE), 100% (NZ), and 78% (USA). The guidelines from NZ and USA were highly recommended, the Swedish was recommended, whereas the Danish was not recommended. The identified core themes were: continuous pain, procedural pain, postoperative pain, pain assessment, anxiety, and non-pharmacological interventions.
The study demonstrated variability in quality, transparency, and core content in clinical guidelines on pain management in burn patients. The most highly recommended guidelines provided clear and accurate recommendations for the nursing and medical staff on pain management in burn patients. We recommend the use of a validated appraisal tool such as the AGREE instrument to provide more consistent and evidence-based care to burn patients in the clinic, to unify guideline construction, and to enable interdepartmental comparison of treatment and outcomes.
烧伤患者因受伤以及与手术、伤口护理和活动相关的程序而遭受极度疼痛。急性应激障碍、创伤后应激障碍、慢性疼痛和抑郁在严重烧伤幸存者中极为普遍。循证疼痛管理可应对并减轻这些并发症。我们研究的目的是比较选定的欧洲和非欧洲国家烧伤患者疼痛管理的临床指南。由于烧伤病房中儿童比例较高,我们纳入了儿科指南。
本研究采用仪器评估和主题分析相结合的方法进行比较性回顾设计。三名研究人员使用AGREE工具(研究与评估指南评估)第二版对丹麦(DK)、瑞典(SE)、新西兰(NZ)和美国烧伤病房的指南进行评估,并确定指南中的核心主题。
AGREE工具六个领域中表示质量的总体得分各不相同,分别为22%(丹麦)、44%(瑞典)、100%(新西兰)和78%(美国)。新西兰和美国的指南被高度推荐,瑞典的被推荐,而丹麦的不被推荐。确定的核心主题为:持续性疼痛、程序性疼痛、术后疼痛、疼痛评估、焦虑和非药物干预。
该研究表明,烧伤患者疼痛管理临床指南在质量、透明度和核心内容方面存在差异。最受推荐的指南为护理和医务人员提供了关于烧伤患者疼痛管理的清晰准确建议。我们建议使用经过验证的评估工具,如AGREE工具,以便在临床中为烧伤患者提供更一致且基于证据的护理,统一指南构建,并实现部门间治疗和结果的比较。