Kauffman Matthew J, Gilmartin Christopher A, Bennett Edward S, Bassi Carl J
*OD, FAAO †OD ‡OD, MSEd, FAAO §PhD University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas (MJK); Private Practice, Traverse City, Michigan (CAG); University of Missouri-St. Louis College of Optometry, St. Louis, Missouri (ESB, CJB).
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Dec;91(12):1462-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000409.
Scleral gas-permeable lenses are rapidly gaining international popularity. Unlike corneal gas-permeable lenses, scleral lenses are fitted to the bulbar conjunctiva and settle into the tissue after insertion. To date, we are unaware of any studies examining the settling behavior of three varying scleral lens designs. The purpose of this study was to quantify the mean total settling and mean rates of settling for three scleral lens designs: Onefit P&A (Blanchard Contact Lens, Inc), Mini Scleral Design (msd) (Blanchard Contact Lens, Inc), and Jupiter (Visionary Optics).
A randomized, repeated-measures study of Onefit P&A, msd, and Jupiter was performed. Subjects were fitted from a trial lens set, according to the manufacturer's guidelines. After insertion, lens settling was measured at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 8 hours. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance and two-stage, nonlinear regression analyses of settling over time.
On average, the Onefit P&A, msd, and Jupiter lenses settled a total of 113.7, 133.7, and 88.1 μm, respectively. Although the rates of settling were not linear, analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in the average settling rates (p < 0.05) among the groups. Tukey analyses revealed a significant difference in the settling rates for msd and Jupiter comparison (p < 0.05). Nonlinear regression analyses predicted that the lenses settled to about 80% of the final estimated values for the Onefit P&A lens, 90% for msd, and 99% for the Jupiter, after 8 hours.
We concluded that the amount of settling varied significantly among the three lens designs. Settling rates were greatest shortly after insertion. Larger lenses were estimated to be settled by 8 hours. Based on the results of this short-term study, careful consideration to the settling patterns of individual scleral lens designs should be given.
巩膜透气硬性角膜接触镜在国际上正迅速受到欢迎。与角膜透气硬性角膜接触镜不同,巩膜镜片是贴合在球结膜上,并在插入后嵌入组织中。迄今为止,我们尚未发现有任何研究考察三种不同巩膜镜片设计的嵌入行为。本研究的目的是量化三种巩膜镜片设计的平均总嵌入量和平均嵌入速率:Onefit P&A(布兰查德隐形眼镜公司)、迷你巩膜设计(msd)(布兰查德隐形眼镜公司)和朱庇特(Visionary Optics)。
对Onefit P&A、msd和朱庇特进行了一项随机、重复测量研究。根据制造商的指导方针,从一组试验镜片中为受试者配镜。插入后,在0分钟、15分钟、30分钟、45分钟、1小时、2小时、4小时、6小时和8小时测量镜片的嵌入情况。使用方差分析和嵌入随时间变化的两阶段非线性回归分析进行统计分析。
平均而言,Onefit P&A、msd和朱庇特镜片的总嵌入量分别为113.7μm、133.7μm和88.1μm。尽管嵌入速率不是线性的,但方差分析显示各组之间的平均嵌入速率存在显著差异(p<0.05)。Tukey分析显示msd和朱庇特比较的嵌入速率存在显著差异(p<0.05)。非线性回归分析预测,8小时后,Onefit P&A镜片的嵌入量达到最终估计值的约80%,msd为90%,朱庇特为99%。
我们得出结论,三种镜片设计的嵌入量差异显著。插入后不久嵌入速率最大。较大的镜片预计在8小时内嵌入完成。基于这项短期研究的结果,应仔细考虑个体巩膜镜片设计的嵌入模式。