McCurdy S A, Wiggins P, Schenker M B, Munn S, Shaieb A M, Weinbaum Z, Goldsmith D, McGillis S T, Berman B, Samuels S
Department of Internal Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, Davis 95616.
Am J Ind Med. 1989;16(2):147-57. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700160206.
We conducted a cross-sectional investigation to determine whether table grape harvesters, who have significant cutaneous contact with crop-associated materials that may cause skin disease, are more likely to develop dermatitis than are a control group of tomato workers performing mechanical harvesting with minimal cutaneous contact with crop-associated substances. A secondary aim was to develop methods for studying skin disease in farm workers, including a standard questionnaire and physical examination. California table grape workers (n = 183) and tomato workers (n = 43) completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire and waist-up physical examination at their work site during harvest operations. On physical examination, pustular eruptions such as acne and folliculitis were present in 30% of subjects, and eczematous rashes were noted in 10% of subjects. Irritant or allergic contact dermatitis was diagnosed in 2% of subjects. No significant differences in prevalence for these skin conditions were observed between the two groups of workers. In contrast to the physical examination results, grape workers were more likely than tomato workers to report a rash occurring in the previous 3 months (52% vs. 19%, p less than 0.001). Explanations for this discrepancy are discussed. The sensitivity of the questionnaire for current skin conditions was 31%, and the specificity was 94%. Improved sensitivity was seen for eczematous skin conditions (55%). We conclude that questionnaires provide an efficient means of assessing subject characteristics, but may have limited sensitivity for some dermatologic outcomes.
我们进行了一项横断面调查,以确定鲜食葡萄采摘工人(他们与可能导致皮肤疾病的农作物相关材料有大量皮肤接触)是否比进行机械采摘且与农作物相关物质皮肤接触极少的对照组番茄工人更容易患皮炎。第二个目的是开发研究农场工人皮肤疾病的方法,包括一份标准问卷和体格检查。加利福尼亚州鲜食葡萄工人(n = 183)和番茄工人(n = 43)在收获季节于工作现场完成了一份由访谈员管理的问卷和上半身体格检查。体格检查发现,30%的受试者有脓疱性皮疹,如痤疮和毛囊炎,10%的受试者有湿疹样皮疹。2%的受试者被诊断为刺激性或过敏性接触性皮炎。两组工人在这些皮肤状况的患病率上未观察到显著差异。与体格检查结果相反,葡萄工人比番茄工人更有可能报告在过去3个月出现皮疹(52%对19%,p小于0.001)。本文讨论了这种差异的原因。该问卷对当前皮肤状况的敏感性为31%,特异性为94%。湿疹性皮肤状况的敏感性有所提高(55%)。我们得出结论,问卷提供了一种评估受试者特征的有效方法,但对某些皮肤病学结果的敏感性可能有限。