Suppr超能文献

医学生对医学院校选拔工具的看法——一项混合方法研究。

Medical students' views on selection tools for medical school--a mixed methods study.

作者信息

Stevens L, Kelly M E, Hennessy M, Last J, Dunne F, O'Flynn S

出版信息

Ir Med J. 2014 Sep;107(8):229-31.

Abstract

It is important to ensure that the tools used in Medical School selection are acceptable to students and applicants. A questionnaire was administered to year 1 medical students in 2010 to determine the suitability of a variety of selection tools and the acceptability of HPAT-Ireland in particular. There were 291 respondents a 77% response rate representing approximately one third of all school leaver entrants that year. While the majority 285 (98%) were in favour of using school leaving examinations there was also support for the use of interviews 215 (74%) and other tools. Three quarters of Irish respondents 159 (76%) agreed that HPAT-Ireland is a fair test overall however section 3 (non-verbal reasoning) appeared less acceptable and relevant than other sections. A little over half had taken a preparatory HPAT-Ireland course 112 (54%). Medical school applicants appear to accept the use of non-traditional tools in the selection process.

摘要

确保医学院校选拔过程中所使用的工具为学生和申请者所接受,这一点至关重要。2010年,我们对一年级医学生进行了问卷调查,以确定各类选拔工具的适用性,特别是爱尔兰高等教育入学考试(HPAT-Ireland)的可接受性。共有291名受访者,回复率为77%,约占当年所有离校生入学人数的三分之一。虽然大多数人(285人,占98%)赞成使用离校考试,但也有215人(占74%)支持采用面试及其他工具。四分之三的爱尔兰受访者(159人,占76%)认为,总体而言,爱尔兰高等教育入学考试是一项公平的测试,然而,与其他部分相比,第3部分(非言语推理)似乎不那么容易被接受,相关性也较低。略超过半数的人(112人,占54%)参加过爱尔兰高等教育入学考试预备课程。医学院校申请者似乎接受在选拔过程中使用非传统工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验