Suppr超能文献

爱尔兰高等医学能力倾向测试(HPAT-Ireland)用于医学生选拔的结构效度:未解决的问题及对未来研究的启示

The construct validity of HPAT-Ireland for the selection of medical students: unresolved issues and future research implications.

作者信息

Kelly Maureen E, O'Flynn Siun

机构信息

Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, Clinical Science Institute, National University of Ireland Galway (NUI Galway), Galway, Ireland.

Medical Education Unit, Medical School, University College Cork (UCC), Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 May;22(2):267-286. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9728-z. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

Abstract

Aptitude tests are widely used in selection. However, despite certain advantages their use remains controversial. This paper aims to critically appraise five sources of evidence for the construct validity of the Health Professions Admission Test (HPAT)-Ireland, an aptitude test used for selecting undergraduate medical students. The objectives are to identify gaps in the evidence, draw comparisons with other aptitude tests and outline future research directions. Our appraisal of the literature found that stakeholder feedback indicates that there is reasonable evidence for test content validity for two of the three sections of HPAT-Ireland. By contrast the Non-Verbal Reasoning section is widely criticised as having limited relevance to medical school performance and future clinical practice. In terms of concurrent validity there is a significant small to medium, negative correlation with school exit examinations, but not consistently so across all studies (r = -0.18, -0.28, 0.017). Likewise predictive validity studies vary, from negative to moderate strength correlations with examination performance during early years at medical school. Five studies indicate that HPAT-Ireland is supported in principle by the majority of stakeholders. While one consequence of its introduction is that successful applicants are now coming from more diverse academic backgrounds, there is no evidence that the socio-economic background of medical school entrants has been altered significantly. Negative perceptions of unfairness relating to gender, coaching and socio-economics remain. The evidence to date suggests that while there are slight gender differences, initially favouring males, these vary year on year. In conclusion, the attitudes towards, and performance of, HPAT-Ireland is not unlike that of other aptitude tests widely used internationally. The main justifications for its introduction have been achieved, in that Ireland no longer relies exclusively on a single measure of academic record for selection to medical school. However a number of areas require further research and exploration.

摘要

能力倾向测试在选拔中被广泛使用。然而,尽管有某些优点,其使用仍存在争议。本文旨在批判性地评估爱尔兰卫生专业入学考试(HPAT)——一种用于选拔本科医学生的能力倾向测试——结构效度的五个证据来源。目标是找出证据中的差距,与其他能力倾向测试进行比较,并概述未来的研究方向。我们对文献的评估发现,利益相关者的反馈表明,对于爱尔兰卫生专业入学考试三个部分中的两个部分,有合理的证据证明测试内容效度。相比之下,非语言推理部分受到广泛批评,因为它与医学院表现和未来临床实践的相关性有限。在同时效度方面,与学校结业考试存在显著的小到中等程度的负相关,但并非在所有研究中都一致如此(r = -0.18、-0.28、0.017)。同样,预测效度研究也各不相同,与医学院早年考试成绩的相关性从负到中等强度不等。五项研究表明,爱尔兰卫生专业入学考试原则上得到了大多数利益相关者的支持。虽然引入该考试的一个结果是,成功申请者现在来自更多样化的学术背景,但没有证据表明医学院入学新生的社会经济背景发生了显著变化。对与性别、辅导和社会经济相关的不公平的负面看法仍然存在。迄今为止的证据表明,虽然存在轻微的性别差异,最初有利于男性,但这些差异逐年变化。总之,对爱尔兰卫生专业入学考试的态度和表现与国际上广泛使用的其他能力倾向测试并无不同。引入该考试的主要理由已经实现,即爱尔兰不再完全依赖单一的学术记录衡量标准来选拔医学院学生。然而,一些领域需要进一步的研究和探索。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验