Suppr超能文献

适用于社区及养老院老年人的简易营养评估量表简表修订版的诊断准确性。

The diagnostic accuracy of the Revised Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form for older people living in the community and in nursing homes.

作者信息

Simsek H, Sahin S, Ucku R, Sieber C C, Meseri R, Tosun P, Akcicek F

机构信息

Hatice Simsek, Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine Izmir, Turkey,

出版信息

J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18(8):725-9. doi: 10.1007/s12603-014-0460-1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CC-SF, which was developed to use calf circumference (CC) instead of BMI in the MNA-SF, for elderly people living in the community and in nursing homes. It also aimed separately to determine the correlation of CC-SF and BMI-SF with the full MNA.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The study included 640 elderly people living in their community and 243 elderly people living in nursing homes. Accuracy was assessed by determining the sensitivity and selectivity of the nutritional assessments. The correlations between the MNA-SFs and the full MNA were analyzed.

RESULTS

The correlation between MNA-SFs and full MNAs was strong, significant and almost identical both in the community and in nursing homes (r=0.86-0.88; p<0.001). The observed agreement between the BMI-SF and the full MNA was 82.2% in the community and 77.8% in the nursing homes. There was a substantial agreement by kappa values in the comparison of community and nursing homes (the Kappa value of the BMI-SF was 0.63 in the community and 0.62 in the nursing homes, and the kappa value of the CC-SF was 0.62 in the community and 0.63 in the nursing homes). When compared to the full MNA the MNA-SFs tended to underestimate nutritional status. Both MNA-SFs had similarly high sensitivity and selectivity, both in the community and nursing homes. (when dichotomized as "malnourished-at risk of malnutrition" versus " well nourished" and "malnourished" versus "at risk of malnutrition-well nourished") (over 80%).

CONCLUSION

In cases where BMI cannot be determined, the CC-SF is a good substitute for the BMI-SF.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定社区和养老院中老年人使用小腿围(CC)代替微型营养评定法简表(MNA-SF)中的体重指数(BMI)所开发的CC-SF的诊断准确性。其另一个目的是分别确定CC-SF和BMI-SF与完整MNA之间的相关性。

研究设计与方法

该研究纳入了640名居住在社区的老年人和243名居住在养老院的老年人。通过确定营养评估的敏感性和选择性来评估准确性。分析了MNA-SF与完整MNA之间的相关性。

结果

社区和养老院中,MNA-SF与完整MNA之间的相关性均很强、具有显著性且几乎相同(r=0.86-0.88;p<0.001)。社区中BMI-SF与完整MNA之间的观察一致性为82.2%,养老院中为77.8%。在社区和养老院的比较中,kappa值显示出高度一致性(BMI-SF在社区中的kappa值为0.63,在养老院中为0.62;CC-SF在社区中的kappa值为0.62,在养老院中为0.63)。与完整MNA相比,MNA-SF往往会低估营养状况。在社区和养老院中,两种MNA-SF均具有同样高的敏感性和选择性(当分为“营养不良-有营养不良风险”与“营养良好”以及“营养不良”与“有营养不良风险-营养良好”时)(超过80%)。

结论

在无法确定BMI的情况下,CC-SF是BMI-SF的良好替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验