Kostka J, Borowiak E, Kostka T
T. Kostka, Department of Geriatrics, Medical University, Pl. Hallera 1, 90-647 Lodz, Poland.
J Nutr Health Aging. 2014 Apr;18(4):366-71. doi: 10.1007/s12603-013-0393-0.
To assess the usefulness in different populations of elderly people in Poland of both modified versions of Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Forms (MNA-SFs) with a three-category scoring classification: one using BMI (MNA-SF-BMI) and another using calf circumference (MNA-SF-CC).
A group of 932 community-dwelling subjects from the urban environment, 812 subjects from the rural environment and 859 subjects from an institutional environment (nursing homes).
Agreement between both MNA-SFs and the MNA full form.
MNA-SF-BMI correctly classified 84.12%, 82.51% and 81.84% of subjects from urban, rural and institutional environment, respectively. For MNA-SF-CC those values were 82.4%, 71.8% and 76.6%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MNA-SF-BMI and MNA-SF-CC against full MNA in screening for "at risk/malnutrition" and "malnutrition" were generally very high, except for relatively lower sensitivity (74.1%) when screening for "malnutrition" with MNA-SF-CC in nursing homes.
Both MNA-SFs can be recommended as screening tools in assessing the nutritional state of the community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly in Poland. The full version of the MNA confirmed the results of MNA-SFs in this group. The "classic" MNA-SF using BMI was found to perform better than the MNA-SF-CC. The MNA-SF-CC should be used only when measuring BMI is not possible. While using MNA-SF-CC in nursing homes, a higher MNA-SF-CC cut-point of eleven should be rather used in this population to screen for "at risk/malnutrition".
评估波兰不同老年人群体中两种采用三类评分分类的简易营养评估简表(MNA-SF)修改版的实用性:一种使用体重指数(MNA-SF-BMI),另一种使用小腿围度(MNA-SF-CC)。
一组来自城市环境的932名社区居住受试者、812名来自农村环境的受试者以及859名来自机构环境(养老院)的受试者。
两种MNA-SF与MNA完整版之间的一致性。
MNA-SF-BMI分别正确分类了城市、农村和机构环境中84.12%、82.51%和81.84%的受试者。对于MNA-SF-CC,这些值分别为82.4%、71.8%和76.6%。MNA-SF-BMI和MNA-SF-CC在筛查“有风险/营养不良”和“营养不良”时相对于完整MNA的敏感性和特异性总体上非常高,除了在养老院使用MNA-SF-CC筛查“营养不良”时敏感性相对较低(74.1%)。
两种MNA-SF均可推荐作为评估波兰社区居住和机构养老老年人营养状况的筛查工具。MNA完整版证实了该组中MNA-SF的结果。发现使用体重指数的“经典”MNA-SF比MNA-SF-CC表现更好。仅在无法测量体重指数时才应使用MNA-SF-CC。在养老院使用MNA-SF-CC时,该人群筛查“有风险/营养不良”时应采用更高的切点值11。