• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创手术的质量与安全:过去、现在与未来。

Quality and safety of minimally invasive surgery: past, present, and future.

作者信息

McCrory Bernadette, LaGrange Chad A, Hallbeck Ms

机构信息

Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.

Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

Biomed Eng Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 21;6:1-11. doi: 10.4137/BECB.S10967. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.4137/BECB.S10967
PMID:25288906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4147776/
Abstract

Adverse events because of medical errors are a leading cause of death in the United States (US) exceeding the mortality rates of motor vehicle accidents, breast cancer, and AIDS. Improvements can and should be made to reduce the rates of preventable surgical errors because they account for nearly half of all adverse events within hospitals. Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has proven patient benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and hospital stay, its operative environment imposes substantial physical and cognitive strain on the surgeon increasing the risk of error. To mitigate errors and protect patients, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to improve MIS. Clinical human factors, and biomedical engineering principles and methodologies can be used to develop and assess laparoscopic surgery instrumentation, practices, and procedures. First, the foundational understanding and the imperative to transform health care into a high-quality and safe system is discussed. Next, a generalized perspective is presented on the impact of the design and redesign of surgical technologies and processes on human performance. Finally, the future of this field and the research needed to further improve the quality and safety of MIS is discussed.

摘要

在美国,医疗差错导致的不良事件是主要死因,其死亡率超过了机动车事故、乳腺癌和艾滋病。应该并且能够做出改进以降低可预防的手术差错发生率,因为手术差错在医院所有不良事件中占近一半。尽管微创手术(MIS)已证明对患者有益,如减轻术后疼痛和缩短住院时间,但其手术环境给外科医生带来了巨大的身体和认知压力,增加了出错风险。为了减少差错并保护患者,需要采用多学科方法来改进微创手术。临床人为因素以及生物医学工程原理和方法可用于开发和评估腹腔镜手术器械、操作和程序。首先,讨论了将医疗保健转变为高质量和安全系统的基本理解和必要性。接下来,从广义角度介绍了手术技术和流程的设计与重新设计对人类表现的影响。最后,讨论了该领域的未来以及进一步提高微创手术质量和安全性所需的研究。

相似文献

1
Quality and safety of minimally invasive surgery: past, present, and future.微创手术的质量与安全:过去、现在与未来。
Biomed Eng Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 21;6:1-11. doi: 10.4137/BECB.S10967. eCollection 2014.
2
Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.选择性腰椎椎间融合术后使用微创融合技术是否与更好的疗效相关?一项全国性前瞻性患者报告结局登记研究的分析。
Spine J. 2017 Jul;17(7):922-932. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
4
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
5
Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.机器人手臂增强功能,以适应复杂的微创手术中提高效率和降低资源利用的需求。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996;29:471-81.
6
Implementing the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on resident physician work hours, supervision, and safety.实施 2009 年美国医学研究所关于住院医师工作时间、监督和安全的建议。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2011 Jun 24;3:47-85. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S19649. Print 2011.
7
Evaluating quality across minimally invasive platforms in colorectal surgery.评估结直肠手术中各微创平台的质量。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2207-16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4479-0. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
8
Evaluating the impact of a minimally invasive pediatric surgeon on hospital practice: comparison of two children's hospitals.评估微创儿科外科医生对医院业务的影响:两家儿童医院的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2281-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4227-5. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
9
Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.微创与开放后路腰椎融合术的围手术期结局及不良事件:荟萃分析与系统评价
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):416-27. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE14973. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
10
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放融合手术:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of Cryptogenic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation: Real-World Insights Into the Role of Insertable Cardiac Monitors.隐源性卒中与心房颤动综述:可植入式心脏监测器作用的真实世界见解
Cureus. 2024 Sep 28;16(9):e70369. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70369. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Deep Learning-Based Fine-Tuning Approach of Coarse Registration for Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Surgical Navigation Systems.基于深度学习的耳鼻喉(ENT)手术导航系统粗配准微调方法
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;11(9):941. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11090941.
3
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Mild-to-Moderate Glaucoma Patients in Italy: Is It Time to Change?

本文引用的文献

1
Socio-Technical Systems Analysis in Health Care: A Research Agenda.医疗保健中的社会技术系统分析:一项研究议程。
IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng. 2011;1(1):145-160. doi: 10.1080/19488300.2011.619158. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
2
A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession.人因/工效学策略:发展学科和专业。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(4):377-95. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.661087. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
3
Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy in cirrhosis: a systematic review of outcomes and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
意大利轻度至中度青光眼患者的微创手术:是时候做出改变了吗?
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 14;14:2639-2655. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S264839. eCollection 2020.
4
Operating hurts: a study of EAES surgeons.手术之痛:EAES 外科医生研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):933-940. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6574-5. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
5
Impact of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and workload: a randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)对手术医生压力和工作量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1205-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4332-5. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
腹腔镜或开腹胆囊切除术治疗肝硬化:系统评价和随机试验的荟萃分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Mar;14(3):153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00425.x. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
4
Ergonomic evaluation of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery ports in a validated laparoscopic training model.在经过验证的腹腔镜训练模型中对腹腔镜单孔手术端口进行人体工程学评估。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:1884-90. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0402-1884.
5
A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.一项对比较腹腔镜辅助结肠癌切除术和开放性结肠癌切除术的随机对照试验的短期和长期结果的荟萃分析。
J Cancer. 2012;3:49-57. doi: 10.7150/jca.3621. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
6
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES(®)): a technical review.自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES(®)):技术综述。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3135-48. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1718-x. Epub 2011 May 7.
7
Cognitive performance-altering effects of electronic medical records: An application of the human factors paradigm for patient safety.电子病历对认知表现的改变作用:将人因范式应用于患者安全
Cogn Technol Work. 2011 Mar;13(1):11-29. doi: 10.1007/s10111-010-0141-8.
8
Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy, transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy.女性人群对传统腹腔镜、经脐LESS 和经阴道NOTES 胆囊切除术的认知。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2308-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1554-4. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
9
Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: comparison of surgical port performance in a surgical simulator with novices.腹腔镜单部位手术(LESS)与传统腹腔镜手术:新手在手术模拟器中比较手术端口性能。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2210-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1524-x. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
10
Where do we really stand with LESS and NOTES?我们在单孔腹腔镜手术和经自然腔道内镜手术方面的实际进展如何?
Eur Urol. 2011 Feb;59(2):231-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.016. Epub 2010 Nov 21.