• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

床边护理交接班:患者的意见

Bedside nursing handover: patients' opinions.

作者信息

Lu Sai, Kerr Debra, McKinlay Louise

机构信息

Victoria University, St. Albans, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Pract. 2014 Oct;20(5):451-9. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12158. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1111/ijn.12158
PMID:25289733
Abstract

Within the context of contemporary nursing practice, bedside handover has been advocated as a potentially more suitable mode for achieving patient-centred care. Given that patients can play an important role in the process, better understanding of patients' perspectives of bedside handover could be a critical determinate for successful implementation of the practice. Using a phenomenological approach, this study attempted to explore patients' perceptions of bedside nursing handover. Four key themes emerged from the patient interviews: 'a more effective and personalised approach', 'being empowered and contributing to error minimization', 'privacy, confidentiality and sensitive topics', and 'training need and avoidance of using technical jargon'. Patients welcome bedside handover as they can be empowered through participation in the process. Nevertheless, attention is needed to ensure that adequate training is provided to nurses and to minimize the use of technical jargon so that handover is delivered with a professional and consistent approach.

摘要

在当代护理实践的背景下,床边交接班被倡导为一种可能更适合实现以患者为中心护理的模式。鉴于患者在这一过程中可以发挥重要作用,更好地理解患者对床边交接班的看法可能是该实践成功实施的关键决定因素。本研究采用现象学方法,试图探索患者对床边护理交接班的认知。患者访谈中出现了四个关键主题:“更有效和个性化的方法”、“获得授权并有助于将错误最小化”、“隐私、保密和敏感话题”以及“培训需求和避免使用专业术语”。患者欢迎床边交接班,因为他们可以通过参与这一过程获得授权。然而,需要注意确保为护士提供充分的培训,并尽量减少专业术语的使用,以便以专业和一致的方式进行交接班。

相似文献

1
Bedside nursing handover: patients' opinions.床边护理交接班:患者的意见
Int J Nurs Pract. 2014 Oct;20(5):451-9. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12158. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
2
Family members' perceptions of the nursing bedside handover.家属对护理床旁交接班的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Jan;22(1-2):192-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04212.x. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
3
Towards patient-centred care: perspectives of nurses and midwives regarding shift-to-shift bedside handover.迈向以患者为中心的护理:护士和助产士对逐班床边交接班的看法。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2014 Jun;20(3):250-7. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12138. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
4
Patient participation in nursing bedside handover: A systematic mixed-methods review.患者参与护理床旁交接班:系统的混合方法综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:243-258. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
5
Attitudes of emergency department patients about handover at the bedside.急诊科患者对床边交接班的态度。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jun;23(11-12):1685-93. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12308. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
6
Patients' views on bedside nursing handover: creating a space to connect.患者对床边护理交接班的看法:创造一个建立联系的空间。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2014 Apr-Jun;29(2):149-54. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000035.
7
Medication communication between nurses and patients during nursing handovers on medical wards: a critical ethnographic study.护士交接班时在医疗病房与患者之间的用药沟通:一项关键民族志研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Aug;49(8):941-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
8
Nurse handover: patient and staff experiences.护士交接班:患者及医护人员的体验
Br J Nurs. 2016;25(7):386-90, 392-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.7.386.
9
Adopting a patient-centred approach: an investigation into the introduction of bedside handover to three rural hospitals.采用以患者为中心的方法:对三家农村医院引入床边交接班的调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jul;23(13-14):1927-36. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12403. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
10
Developing a framework for nursing handover in the emergency department: an individualised and systematic approach.制定急诊科护理交接班框架:个性化与系统化方法
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Aug;22(15-16):2233-43. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12274.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient perceptions of outcomes used to evaluate in-hospital handover interventions: a rapid review of qualitative data.用于评估住院期间交接班干预措施的患者对结果的认知:定性数据的快速回顾
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 8;15(8):e100883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100883.
2
Impact of Bedside Handover on Patient Perceptions and Hospital Organizational Outcomes: A Systematic Review.床边交接班对患者认知及医院组织成果的影响:一项系统综述
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jul 21;2025:3803491. doi: 10.1155/jonm/3803491. eCollection 2025.
3
Translation and Validation for the Portuguese Population of the Bedside Handover Attitudes and Behaviors Questionnaire.
《床边交接班态度与行为问卷》葡萄牙语版本的翻译与验证
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jan 17;18:185-203. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S482728. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluating the Methodological Approaches of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Bedside Handover Attitudes and Behaviours Questionnaire into Portuguese.评估《床边交接班态度与行为问卷》跨文化改编为葡萄牙语的方法学途径。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2023 Sep 1;15:193-208. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S422122. eCollection 2023.
5
Improving Nurses’ Hand-off Process on Oncology Setting Using Lean Management Principles.运用精益管理原则改善肿瘤护理环境中的护士交接班流程。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 May 25;20(5):1563-1570. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.5.1563.
6
Is privacy a problem during bedside handovers? A practice-oriented discussion paper.在床边交接班时,隐私是否会成为一个问题?一份基于实践的讨论文件。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):2288-2297. doi: 10.1177/0969733018791348. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
7
Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover: Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment.患者和护士对床边交接班实施的偏好:他们是否一致?来自离散选择实验的结果。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):742-750. doi: 10.1111/hex.12513. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
8
"I wish they could be in my shoes": patients' insights into tertiary health care for type 2 diabetes mellitus.“我希望他们能站在我的立场”:患者对2型糖尿病三级医疗保健的见解。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Nov 17;9:1647-55. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S91214. eCollection 2015.
9
Patient and nurse preferences for nurse handover-using preferences to inform policy: a discrete choice experiment protocol.患者和护士对护士交接班的偏好——运用偏好为政策提供信息:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 11;5(11):e008941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008941.