Nguyen Giang T, Yehia Baligh R
1Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
2Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Popul Health Manag. 2015 Jun;18(3):217-22. doi: 10.1089/pop.2014.0075. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
The 2011 Institute of Medicine report on LGBT health recommended that sexual orientation and gender identity (SO/GI) be documented in electronic health records (EHRs). Most EHRs cannot document all aspects of SO/GI, but some can record gender of sexual partners. This study sought to determine the proportion of patients who have the gender of sexual partners recorded in the EHR and to identify factors associated with documentation. A retrospective analysis was done of EHR data for 40 family medicine (FM) and general internal medicine (IM) practices, comprising 170,570 adult patients seen in 2012. The primary outcome was EHR documentation of sexual partner gender. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the impact of patient, provider, and practice factors on documentation. In all, 76,767 patients (45%) had the gender of sexual partners recorded, 4.3% of whom had same-gender partners (3.5% of females, 5.6% of males). Likelihood of documentation was independently higher for women; blacks; those with a preventive visit; those with a physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or resident primary care provider (vs. attending); those at urban practices; those at smaller practices; and those at a residency FM practice. Older age and Medicare insurance were associated with lower documentation. Sexual partner gender documentation is important to identify patients for targeted prevention and support, and holds great potential for population health management, yet documentation in the EHR currently is low. Primary care practices should routinely record the gender of sexual partners, and additional work is needed to identify best practices for collecting and using SO/GI data in this setting.
2011年医学研究所关于 LGBT 健康的报告建议在电子健康记录(EHR)中记录性取向和性别认同(SO/GI)。大多数电子健康记录无法记录 SO/GI 的所有方面,但有些可以记录性伴侣的性别。本研究旨在确定电子健康记录中记录了性伴侣性别的患者比例,并确定与记录相关的因素。对40个家庭医学(FM)和普通内科(IM)诊所的电子健康记录数据进行了回顾性分析,这些数据来自2012年就诊的170,570名成年患者。主要结果是电子健康记录中性伴侣性别的记录情况。多因素逻辑回归评估了患者、提供者和诊所因素对记录的影响。总共有76,767名患者(45%)记录了性伴侣的性别,其中4.3%的患者有同性伴侣(女性为3.5%,男性为5.6%)。女性、黑人、进行预防性就诊的患者、由医师助理、执业护士或住院医师作为初级保健提供者(相对于主治医师)的患者、在城市诊所就诊的患者、在规模较小诊所就诊的患者以及在家庭医学住院医师培训诊所就诊的患者,其记录的可能性独立较高。年龄较大和参加医疗保险与较低的记录率相关。性伴侣性别记录对于识别需要针对性预防和支持的患者很重要,并且在人群健康管理方面具有巨大潜力,但目前电子健康记录中的记录率较低。初级保健诊所应常规记录性伴侣的性别,并且需要开展更多工作来确定在这种情况下收集和使用 SO/GI 数据的最佳做法。