Suppr超能文献

多种分类方法对血管性认知障碍非痴呆型的比较

Comparison of vascular cognitive impairment--no dementia by multiple classification methods.

作者信息

Ma Jie, Zhang Yunyun, Guo Qihao

机构信息

a Stroke Unit, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Shanghai , China.

b Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University , Shanghai , China.

出版信息

Int J Neurosci. 2015;125(11):823-30. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2014.972504. Epub 2014 Oct 29.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare vascular cognitive impairment-no dementia (VCI-ND) using different classification methods.

METHODS

We recruited 56 patients with VCI-ND between April 2012 and March 2013. We used a battery of neuropsychological tests to classify patients with VCI-ND into different subtypes based on memory and executive function as follows: cognitive screening (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE), memory (Auditory Verbal Learning Test, AVLT), executive/attention (Shape Trails Test, STT; Stroop Color-Word Test, SCWT; Reading the Mind in the Eyes, RME; Digit Ordering Test-A, DOT-A; Symbol Digit Modalities Test, SDMT), language (Action Naming Test, ANT; Boston Naming Test, BNT; Famous Face Test, FFT; Similarity Test, ST; Verbal Fluency Test, VFT) and visuospatial function (Complex Figure Test, CFT).

RESULTS

The two groups had comparable demographic information (P>0.05). Amnestic VCI-ND (aVCI-ND) patients obtained significantly lower scores compared with individuals with nonamnestic VCI-ND (naVCI-ND) on the AVLT memory test, VFT language test and VFT-alternating executive test (P<0.05). Additionally, executive VCI-ND (eVCI-ND) patients performed significantly longer than nonexecutive VCI-ND (neVCI-ND) patients on the SCWT-C timed executive test. Finally, eVCI-ND patients obtained significantly lower scores compared with neVCI-ND patients on the RME, DOT-A and SDMT-correct executive tests and the ANT, BNT and ST language tests (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

aVCI-ND patients performed poorly compared with naVCI-ND patients in terms of executive and language functions, while eVCI-ND patients performed poorly compared with neVCI-ND patients in terms of language function.

摘要

目的

比较使用不同分类方法的血管性认知障碍非痴呆(VCI-ND)。

方法

2012年4月至2013年3月期间,我们招募了56例VCI-ND患者。我们使用一系列神经心理学测试,根据记忆和执行功能将VCI-ND患者分为不同亚型,具体如下:认知筛查(简易精神状态检查表,MMSE)、记忆(听觉词语学习测试,AVLT)、执行/注意力(形状连线测试,STT;斯特鲁普颜色-词语测试,SCWT;读心术测试,RME;数字排序测试-A,DOT-A;符号数字模式测试,SDMT)、语言(动作命名测试,ANT;波士顿命名测试,BNT;名人面孔测试,FFT;相似性测试,ST;语言流畅性测试,VFT)和视觉空间功能(复杂图形测试,CFT)。

结果

两组的人口统计学信息具有可比性(P>0.05)。在AVLT记忆测试、VFT语言测试和VFT交替执行测试中,遗忘型VCI-ND(aVCI-ND)患者的得分显著低于非遗忘型VCI-ND(naVCI-ND)患者(P<0.05)。此外,在SCWT-C定时执行测试中,执行型VCI-ND(eVCI-ND)患者的完成时间显著长于非执行型VCI-ND(neVCI-ND)患者。最后,在RME、DOT-A和SDMT正确执行测试以及ANT、BNT和ST语言测试中,eVCI-ND患者的得分显著低于neVCI-ND患者(P<0.05)。

结论

在执行和语言功能方面,aVCI-ND患者的表现比naVCI-ND患者差;而在语言功能方面,eVCI-ND患者的表现比neVCI-ND患者差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验