Suga Uhana Seifert Guimarães, Terada Raquel Sano Suga, Ubaldini Adriana Lemos Mori, Fujimaki Mitsue, Pascotto Renata Corrêa, Batilana Adelia Portero, Pietrobon Ricardo, Vissoci João Ricardo N, Rodrigues Clarissa G
Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 8;9(10):e107831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107831. eCollection 2014.
Dental caries is a serious public health concern. The high cost of dental treatment can be avoided by effective preventive measures, which are dependent on dentists' adherence. This study aimed to evaluate the factors that drive dentists towards or away from dental caries preventive measures.
This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42012002235). Several databases as well as the reference lists and citations of the included publications were searched according to PRISMA guidelines, yielding 18,276 titles and abstracts, which were assessed to determine study eligibility. Seven qualitative studies and 41 surveys (36,501 participants) remained after data extraction and interpretation. A total of 43 findings were abstracted from the reports and were grouped together into 6 categories that were judged to be topically similar: education and training, personal beliefs, work conditions, remuneration, gender, place of residence and patients. The main findings for adherence based on their calculated frequency effect sizes (ES) were teamwork (21%) and post-graduation (12%), while for non-adherence were biologicism (27%), and remuneration for preventive procedures (25%). Intensity ES were also calculated and demonstrated low prevalence of the findings. Quality assessment of the studies demonstrated that the methodological quality, particularly of surveys, varied widely among studies.
Despite the questionable quality of the included reports, the evidence that emerged seems to indicate that further education and training coupled with a fairer pay scheme would be a reasonable approach to change the balance in favor of the provision of dental caries preventive measures by dentists. The results of this review could be of value in the planning and decision making processes aimed at encouraging changes in professional dental practice that could result in the improvement of the oral health care provided to the population in general.
龋齿是一个严重的公共卫生问题。有效的预防措施可以避免高昂的牙科治疗费用,而这些措施的实施依赖于牙医的依从性。本研究旨在评估促使牙医采取或不采取龋齿预防措施的因素。
本系统评价已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42012002235)登记。根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,检索了多个数据库以及纳入出版物的参考文献列表和引用文献,共获得18276个标题和摘要,经评估以确定研究的纳入资格。经过数据提取和解读后,保留了7项定性研究和41项调查(36501名参与者)。从报告中总共提取了43项研究结果,并将其归为6类,这些类别在主题上被认为相似:教育与培训、个人信念、工作条件、薪酬、性别、居住地和患者。根据计算出的频率效应量(ES),依从性的主要影响因素是团队合作(21%)和毕业后教育(12%),而非依从性的主要影响因素是生物主义(27%)和预防性治疗的薪酬(25%)。还计算了强度效应量,结果显示这些研究结果的发生率较低。对这些研究的质量评估表明,研究的方法学质量,尤其是调查研究的质量,在不同研究之间差异很大。
尽管纳入报告的质量存在问题,但所获得的证据似乎表明,进一步的教育和培训以及更公平的薪酬方案可能是一种合理的方法,有助于改变平衡,使牙医更倾向于提供龋齿预防措施。本综述的结果可能对规划和决策过程有价值,这些过程旨在鼓励牙科专业实践的改变,从而改善总体人群的口腔卫生保健。