Suppr超能文献

用于泪沟填充的微创技术进展

Evolving Minimally Invasive Techniques for Tear Trough Enhancement.

作者信息

Hill Robert H, Czyz Craig N, Kandapalli Srinivas, Zhang-Nunes Sandy X, Cahill Kenneth V, Wulc Allan E, Foster Jill A

机构信息

*Plastic Surgery Ohio, The Eye Center of Columbus; †Department of Ophthalmology, The Ohio State University; ‡Section of Oculofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio Health Doctors Hospital, Ohio University, Columbus Ohio; §Department of Ophthalmology, Drexel University; and ‖Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennysylvania, U.S.A.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(4):306-9. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000325.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate whether volumetric enhancement of the infraorbital rim area or, alternatively, of the deep medial cheek, results in greater improvement of tear trough deformity.

METHODS

This prospective, single-blind study recruited 12 patients seeking correction of tear trough deformity. Pretreatment standardized photographs were obtained after which patients were randomized to receive hyaluronic acid gel filler augmentation of the tear trough on one side and hyaluronic acid gel augmentation of the cheek on the contralateral side. The patients were then re-examined at 3 weeks postinjection when standardized photographs were taken again. Following the photographs, filler was added to the side and location where they were not used at the original treatment, resulting in added volume in both the cheek and the tear trough. The patients returned 3 weeks later when final photographs were taken. The pre- and post-treatment images were randomized and evaluated by 3 masked observers asked to evaluate the depth of tear trough.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in the depth of the tear trough rating after initial treatment on the side treated in the tear trough (p = 0.0001). There was not a significant change in depth of tear trough rating, however, on the side receiving cheek only treatment (p = 0.0963). There was a statistically significant change in tear trough rating after both tear trough and cheek had been treated on each side (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between sides after lid and cheek treatment had been completed on each side (p = 0.5986). Intraclass correlation between reviewers for all subjects was excellent at 0.94. Tear trough injections were more technique sensitive than cheek volume augmentation to achieve satisfactory results. There were no complications from cheek volume enhancement. Varying degrees of ecchymosis were encountered with tear trough injections.

CONCLUSIONS

When the patient's primary concern is the appearance of the tear trough, and the physician is limited to treating either the tear trough or the cheek alone, it appears that treatment in the tear trough offers greater improvement in the appearance of the tear trough deformity when compared with treatment in the cheek alone.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查眶下缘区域或深部内侧脸颊的容积增加是否能更有效地改善泪沟畸形。

方法

这项前瞻性单盲研究招募了12名寻求矫正泪沟畸形的患者。在获得治疗前的标准化照片后,患者被随机分为两组,一侧接受透明质酸凝胶填充剂填充泪沟,另一侧接受透明质酸凝胶填充脸颊。然后在注射后3周对患者进行复查,再次拍摄标准化照片。拍照后,在最初治疗未使用填充剂的一侧和部位添加填充剂,使脸颊和泪沟的容积都增加。3周后患者再次返回,拍摄最终照片。治疗前和治疗后的图像被随机排列,由3名蒙面观察者进行评估,要求他们评估泪沟的深度。

结果

在泪沟侧进行初始治疗后,泪沟深度评分有显著改善(p = 0.0001)。然而,仅接受脸颊治疗的一侧,泪沟深度评分没有显著变化(p = 0.0963)。在两侧的泪沟和脸颊都接受治疗后,泪沟评分有统计学上的显著变化(p = 0.001)。在两侧的眼睑和脸颊治疗完成后,两侧之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.5986)。所有受试者的观察者间组内相关性极佳,为0.94。与脸颊容积增加相比,泪沟注射在实现满意效果方面对技术更敏感。脸颊容积增加没有并发症。泪沟注射出现了不同程度的瘀斑。

结论

当患者主要关注泪沟外观,且医生只能单独治疗泪沟或脸颊时,与单独治疗脸颊相比,治疗泪沟似乎能更有效地改善泪沟畸形的外观。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验