• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与地位平等的人相比,欺骗自己以更好地欺骗地位高的人。

Deceiving yourself to better deceive high-status compared to equal-status others.

作者信息

Lu Hui Jing, Chang Lei

机构信息

Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2014 Jun 19;12(3):635-54. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200310.

DOI:10.1177/147470491401200310
PMID:25299997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10481059/
Abstract

The arms race between deception and detection is likely to have played out between individuals in different status hierarchies, with low-status individuals more likely to be deceivers and high-status individuals more likely to be detectors than the other way around. Memory and its distortion may be temporarily employed first to keep truthful information away from both self and others and later to retrieve accurate information to benefit the self. Using a dual-retrieval paradigm, we tested the hypothesis that people are likely to deceive themselves to better deceive high- rather than equal-status others. College student participants were explicitly instructed (Study 1 and 2) or induced (Study 3) to deceive either a high-status teacher or an equal-status fellow student. When interacting with the high- but not equal-status target, participants in three studies genuinely remembered fewer previously studied items than they did on a second memory test alone without the deceiving target. The results support the view that self-deception responds to status hierarchy that registers probabilities of deception detection such that people are more likely to self-deceive high- rather than equal-status others.

摘要

在不同地位等级的个体之间,欺骗与察觉之间的“军备竞赛”可能已经展开,地位低的个体比地位高的个体更有可能成为欺骗者,而地位高的个体比地位低的个体更有可能成为察觉者。记忆及其扭曲可能首先被临时用于使真实信息远离自己和他人,随后用于检索准确信息以使自己受益。我们采用双检索范式,检验了这样一个假设:人们可能会自我欺骗,以便更好地欺骗地位高而非地位相当的他人。明确指示(研究1和2)或诱导(研究3)大学生参与者欺骗一位地位高的教师或一位地位相当的同学。在与地位高而非地位相当的目标对象互动时,三项研究中的参与者在第二次单独记忆测试(没有欺骗目标对象)中真正记住的先前学习的项目,比在有欺骗目标对象时更多。结果支持了这样一种观点,即自我欺骗会对地位等级做出反应,而地位等级记录了欺骗被察觉的概率,因此人们更有可能对地位高而非地位相当的他人进行自我欺骗。

相似文献

1
Deceiving yourself to better deceive high-status compared to equal-status others.与地位平等的人相比,欺骗自己以更好地欺骗地位高的人。
Evol Psychol. 2014 Jun 19;12(3):635-54. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200310.
2
Destination memory and deception: when I lie to Barack Obama about the moon.目标记忆与欺骗:当我向巴拉克·奥巴马谎报月球情况时。
Psychol Res. 2018 May;82(3):600-606. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0840-8. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
3
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Deception and self-deception.欺骗与自欺。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;3(10):1055-1061. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0666-7. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
5
Deception and Drug Acquisition: Correlates of "Success" Among Drug-Seeking Patients.欺骗与药物获取:寻求药物治疗的患者中“成功”的相关因素
J Prim Care Community Health. 2016 Jul;7(3):175-9. doi: 10.1177/2150131916628462. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
Self-deceived individuals are better at deceiving others.自我欺骗的人更善于欺骗他人。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 27;9(8):e104562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104562. eCollection 2014.
7
Telling a truth to deceive: Examining executive control and reward-related processes underlying interpersonal deception.以真相行欺骗:探究人际欺骗背后的执行控制和奖励相关过程。
Brain Cogn. 2018 Aug;125:149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
8
Situational and dispositional determinants of intentional deceiving.情境和性格倾向因素对有意欺骗的影响。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 29;6(4):e19465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019465.
9
Self-deception requires vagueness.自欺需要模糊性。
Cognition. 2010 May;115(2):268-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.017. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
10
Relationship between Lower Tendency to Deceive in Aging and Inhibitory Compromise.衰老过程中较低的欺骗倾向与抑制妥协之间的关系。
Gerontology. 2018;64(1):67-73. doi: 10.1159/000477806. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Comparative Direction and Comparative Gap on Self-Deception.比较方向和比较差距对自我欺骗的影响。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Jul 29;17:2819-2834. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S467437. eCollection 2024.
2
Psychometric properties of the CEMA-A questionnaire: motives for lying.CEMA-A问卷的心理测量特性:说谎动机
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 20;14:1289209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1289209. eCollection 2023.
3
Sexual Desire of Women With Fast and Slow Life History Throughout the Ovulatory Cycle.女性在整个排卵周期中具有快速和慢速生活史的性欲望。
Evol Psychol. 2023 Jan-Mar;21(1):14747049221148695. doi: 10.1177/14747049221148695.
4
Truth and lies in your eyes: Pupil dilation of White participants in truthful and deceptive responses to White and Black partners.在你的眼中是真相还是谎言:在对白人及黑人伙伴做出真实及欺骗反应时,白人参与者的瞳孔扩张。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0239512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239512. eCollection 2020.
5
Self-Deception Reduces Cognitive Load: The Role of Involuntary Conscious Memory Impairment.自我欺骗减轻认知负荷:非自愿性意识记忆损害的作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 30;10:1718. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01718. eCollection 2019.
6
The Influence of Self-Control and Social Status on Self-Deception.自我控制和社会地位对自我欺骗的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 6;9:1256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01256. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
The evolution and psychology of self-deception.自欺的进化与心理学。
Behav Brain Sci. 2011 Feb;34(1):1-16; discussion 16-56. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10001354.
2
Powerful people are better liars.
Harv Bus Rev. 2010 May;88(5):32-3.
3
Variation in withholding of information in three monkey species.三种猴类在信息隐瞒方面的差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 22;276(1671):3311-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0759. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
4
Modularity and the social mind: are psychologists too self-ish?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 May;11(2):131-49. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294906.
5
Adaptive memory: the comparative value of survival processing.适应性记忆:生存加工的比较价值
Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb;19(2):176-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02064.x.
6
Chimpanzees deceive a human competitor by hiding.黑猩猩通过躲藏来欺骗人类竞争者。
Cognition. 2006 Oct;101(3):495-514. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.011. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
7
Leading a conspecific away from food in ravens (Corvus corax)?引导乌鸦(渡鸦)远离食物?
Anim Cogn. 2004 Apr;7(2):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s10071-003-0189-4. Epub 2003 Sep 10.
8
Intelligence and class mobility in the British population.英国人口中的智力与阶层流动
Br J Psychol. 2003 Nov;94(Pt 4):551-61. doi: 10.1348/000712603322503097.
9
Withholding information in semifree-ranging Tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana).在半散养的汤基猕猴(食蟹猕猴)中隐瞒信息。
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Mar;117(1):67-75. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.1.67.
10
The impact of different directed forgetting instructions on implicit and explicit memory: new evidence from a modified process dissociation procedure.不同定向遗忘指令对内隐记忆和外显记忆的影响:来自修正后的过程分离程序的新证据。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Feb;56(2):211-31. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000431.