• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较方向和比较差距对自我欺骗的影响。

The Effect of Comparative Direction and Comparative Gap on Self-Deception.

作者信息

Yang Ying, Zhong Bowei, Zhang Wenjie, Fan Wei

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Education Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.

Hunan Key Laboratory of Cognition and Human Behavior, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Jul 29;17:2819-2834. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S467437. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S467437
PMID:39099587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11296510/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Self-deception refers to an individual holding inflated beliefs about their abilities, plays a crucial role in human behavior and decision-making. Individuals may inflate their abilities when subject to comparisons with others. This study examined the impact of social comparison on self-deception through the implementation of two behavioral experiments.

METHODS

In Experiment 1, we recruited a sample of 152 undergraduate students. Participants were falsely informed that they performed better (downward comparison) and worse (upward comparison) than average on a game. Subsequently, their level of self-deception was assessed by asking them to predict their performance in a future game, with more inflated predictions indicating greater self-deception. In Experiment 2, we gathered 126 undergraduate students to broaden the current study. This experiment examined the combined effects of comparison direction and comparison gap on self-deceptive behavior.

RESULTS

The findings showed that self-deception was more common in circumstances of upward comparison than in downward comparison or no comparison (Experiment 1). Furthermore, Individuals were more inclined to participate in self-deception when encountering a notable performance gap relative to others, particularly in scenarios involving upward social comparison (Experiment 2).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggested that when confronted with threatening social comparative information, people tended to use self-deception to protect themselves. Members of the large gap group experienced strong feelings of unfairness and negative emotions, which led to self-protective behaviors and a greater likelihood of self-deception.

摘要

目的

自我欺骗是指个体对自身能力持有夸大的信念,在人类行为和决策中起着关键作用。当个体与他人进行比较时,可能会夸大自己的能力。本研究通过两项行为实验检验了社会比较对自我欺骗的影响。

方法

在实验1中,我们招募了152名本科生作为样本。参与者被错误告知他们在一款游戏中的表现比平均水平好(向下比较)或差(向上比较)。随后,通过要求他们预测自己在未来游戏中的表现来评估他们的自我欺骗程度,预测越夸大表明自我欺骗程度越高。在实验2中,我们收集了126名本科生以拓展当前研究。该实验考察了比较方向和比较差距对自我欺骗行为的综合影响。

结果

研究结果表明,自我欺骗在向上比较的情况下比向下比较或无比较的情况下更为常见(实验1)。此外,当个体与他人存在显著的表现差距时,尤其是在涉及向上社会比较的情况下,他们更倾向于参与自我欺骗(实验2)。

结论

研究结果表明,当面对具有威胁性的社会比较信息时,人们倾向于使用自我欺骗来保护自己。差距较大组的成员会产生强烈的不公平感和负面情绪,这导致了自我保护行为以及更大的自我欺骗可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/cf04caf9b1f2/PRBM-17-2819-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/cf227bfbf596/PRBM-17-2819-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/b6d469d93109/PRBM-17-2819-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/8091d2ab0266/PRBM-17-2819-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/d839e9d0f0c5/PRBM-17-2819-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/c235be213531/PRBM-17-2819-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/dc1c586ca367/PRBM-17-2819-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/98ee36a32d91/PRBM-17-2819-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/cf04caf9b1f2/PRBM-17-2819-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/cf227bfbf596/PRBM-17-2819-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/b6d469d93109/PRBM-17-2819-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/8091d2ab0266/PRBM-17-2819-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/d839e9d0f0c5/PRBM-17-2819-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/c235be213531/PRBM-17-2819-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/dc1c586ca367/PRBM-17-2819-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/98ee36a32d91/PRBM-17-2819-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc3/11296510/cf04caf9b1f2/PRBM-17-2819-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Comparative Direction and Comparative Gap on Self-Deception.比较方向和比较差距对自我欺骗的影响。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Jul 29;17:2819-2834. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S467437. eCollection 2024.
2
The impact of social comparison on self-deception: An event-related potentials study.社会比较对自欺的影响:一项事件相关电位研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Oct;24(5):931-947. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01203-x. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Higher Self-Control, Less Deception: The Effect of Self-Control on Deception Behaviors.自我控制能力越强,欺骗行为越少:自我控制对欺骗行为的影响。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2020 Jul 14;16(3):228-241. doi: 10.5709/acp-0299-3. eCollection 2020.
5
How individuals react emotionally to others' (mis)fortunes: A social comparison framework.个体如何对他人的(不)幸进行情绪反应:一个社会比较框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Jul;123(1):55-83. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000299. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
Frequency of concealment, fabrication and falsification of study data by deceptive subjects.具有欺骗行为的受试者隐瞒、编造和伪造研究数据的频率。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Jan 19;21:100713. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100713. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
The counterfeit self: the deceptive costs of faking it.虚假的自我:伪装的欺骗代价。
Psychol Sci. 2010 May;21(5):712-20. doi: 10.1177/0956797610366545. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
8
Perceived warmth and competence of others shape voluntary deceptive behaviour in a morally relevant setting.他人的感知温暖和能力会影响在具有道德相关性的环境下的自愿欺骗行为。
Br J Psychol. 2018 Feb;109(1):25-44. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12245. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
9
The Effect of Negative Feedback on Positive Beliefs in Self-Deception.负反馈对自我欺骗中积极信念的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 5;10:702. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00702. eCollection 2019.
10
Social comparison in the classroom: Priming approach/avoidance changes the impact of social comparison on self-evaluation and performance.课堂中的社会比较:启动趋近/回避改变了社会比较对自我评价和表现的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2022 Jun;92(2):e12466. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12466. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Biting the hand that feeds: A status-based model of when and why receiving help motivates social undermining.恩将仇报:一个基于地位的模型,用于解释何时以及为何接受帮助会引发社会破坏行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2023 Jan;108(1):27-52. doi: 10.1037/apl0000580. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
A motivational framework of social comparison.社会比较的动机框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jun;120(6):1415-1430. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000204. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest.认知控制增加了作弊者的诚实度,但却降低了诚实者的作弊倾向。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):19080-19091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003480117. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
4
Unintended consequences of being proactive? Linking proactive personality to coworker envy, helping, and undermining, and the moderating role of prosocial motivation.主动行为的意外后果?将主动人格与同事嫉妒、帮助和破坏联系起来,以及亲社会动机的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Feb;106(2):250-267. doi: 10.1037/apl0000494. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
5
The Effect of Negative Feedback on Positive Beliefs in Self-Deception.负反馈对自我欺骗中积极信念的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 5;10:702. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00702. eCollection 2019.
6
The Influence of Self-Control and Social Status on Self-Deception.自我控制和社会地位对自我欺骗的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 6;9:1256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01256. eCollection 2018.
7
Keeping (future) rivals down: Temporal social comparison predicts coworker social undermining via future status threat and envy.压制(未来)对手:时间性社会比较通过未来地位威胁和嫉妒预测同事社会破坏。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Apr;103(4):399-415. doi: 10.1037/apl0000281. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace.有缺陷的自我评估:对健康、教育和工作场所的影响。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Dec;5(3):69-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x. Epub 2004 Dec 1.
9
Deceiving yourself to better deceive high-status compared to equal-status others.与地位平等的人相比,欺骗自己以更好地欺骗地位高的人。
Evol Psychol. 2014 Jun 19;12(3):635-54. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200310.
10
The morning morality effect: the influence of time of day on unethical behavior.早晨道德效应:时间对不道德行为的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):95-102. doi: 10.1177/0956797613498099. Epub 2013 Oct 28.