Suppr超能文献

使用莫达非尼或阿戈美拉汀增强抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症阴性症状:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Antipsychotic augmentation with modafinil or armodafinil for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Andrade Chittaranjan, Kisely Steve, Monteiro Ingrid, Rao Sanjay

机构信息

Department of Psychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore 560 029, India.

School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Level 4, Building 1, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba QLD 4102, Australia.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Jan;60:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Sep 20.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of modafinil or armodafinil (ar/mod) augmentation in schizophrenia. We searched PubMed, clinical trial registries, reference lists, and other sources for parallel group, placebo-controlled RCTs. Our primary outcome variable was the effect of ar/mod on negative symptom outcomes. Eight RCTs (pooled N = 372; median duration, 8 weeks) met our selection criteria. Ar/mod (200 mg/day) significantly attenuated negative symptom ratings (6 RCTs; N = 322; standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.26; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.04). This finding remained similar in all but one sensitivity analysis - when the only RCT in acutely ill patients was excluded, the outcome was no longer statistically significant (SMD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.51 to 0.06). The absolute advantage for ar/mod was small: just 0.27 points on the PANSS-N (6 RCTs). Ar/mod attenuated total psychopathology ratings (7 RCTs; N = 342; SMD, -0.23; 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.02) but did not influence positive symptom ratings (5 RCTs; N = 302; mean difference, -0.58; 95% CI, -1.71 to 0.55). Although data were limited, cognition, fatigue, daytime drowsiness, adverse events, and drop out rates did not differ significantly between ar/mod and placebo groups. Fixed and random effects models yielded similar results. There was no heterogeneity in all but one analysis. Publication bias could not be tested. We conclude that ar/mod (200 mg/day) is safe and well tolerated in the short-term treatment of schizophrenia. Ar/mod reduces negative symptoms with a small effect size; the absolute advantage is also small, and the advantage disappears when chronically ill patients or those with high negative symptom burden are treated. Ar/mod does not benefit or worsen other symptom dimensions in schizophrenia.

摘要

我们对莫达非尼或阿得拉非尼(ar/mod)用于精神分裂症增效治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了PubMed、临床试验注册库、参考文献列表以及其他来源,以查找平行组、安慰剂对照的RCT。我们的主要结局变量是ar/mod对阴性症状结局的影响。八项RCT(汇总样本量N = 372;中位持续时间8周)符合我们的纳入标准。Ar/mod(200毫克/天)显著降低了阴性症状评分(6项RCT;N = 322;标准化均数差[SMD],-0.26;95%置信区间,-0.48至-0.04)。除一项敏感性分析外,所有分析的这一结果均相似——排除急性病患者的唯一一项RCT后,该结果不再具有统计学意义(SMD,-0.17;95%置信区间,-0.51至0.06)。Ar/mod的绝对优势较小:在PANSS-N量表上仅高0.27分(6项RCT)。Ar/mod降低了总体精神病理学评分(7项RCT;N = 342;SMD,-0.23;95%置信区间,-0.45至-0.02),但未影响阳性症状评分(5项RCT;N = 302;均数差,-0.58;95%置信区间,-1.71至0.55)。尽管数据有限,但ar/mod组和安慰剂组在认知、疲劳、日间嗜睡、不良事件及脱落率方面并无显著差异。固定效应模型和随机效应模型得出了相似的结果。除一项分析外,所有分析均无异质性。无法检验发表偏倚。我们得出结论,ar/mod(200毫克/天)在精神分裂症的短期治疗中安全且耐受性良好。Ar/mod可减轻阴性症状,但效应量较小;绝对优势也较小,且在慢性病患者或阴性症状负担较重的患者接受治疗时,该优势消失。Ar/mod对精神分裂症的其他症状维度并无益处或使其恶化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验