Suppr超能文献

哮喘中是否存在保护性毒蕈碱受体机制缺失?

Is there loss of protective muscarinic receptor mechanism in asthma?

作者信息

Ayala L E, Ahmed T

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary Disease, University of Miami School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach.

出版信息

Chest. 1989 Dec;96(6):1285-91. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.6.1285.

Abstract

We investigated the hypothesis that prior airway muscarinic receptor stimulation (with aerosolized methacholine) would modify the bronchoconstrictor response to histamine, which is, in part, vagally mediated. On four different experiment days, the following combinations of methacholine and histamine inhalation challenges were performed in 15 subjects (nine normal and six asthmatic) in a random fashion: methacholine-histamine, histamine-methacholine; methacholine-methacholine and histamine-histamine. Cumulative provocative dose of each agonist which caused a 50 percent decrease in SGaw was estimated (PD50). The second challenge was performed approximately 1 hour after the first challenge, when SGaw had returned to baseline. In normal subjects, prior muscarinic stimulation with methacholine suppressed the subsequent bronchoconstrictor response to histamine (mean +/- SE PD50 histamine increased from 13.7 +/- 3.1 to 28.4 +/- 7.2 breath units), without modifying the bronchoconstrictor response to methacholine. In asthmatic subjects, prior methacholine exposure failed to modify the bronchoconstrictor responses to histamine and methacholine. In contrast, prior challenge with histamine did not modify the subsequent bronchoconstrictor responses to histamine and methacholine in both normal and asthmatic subjects. Pretreatment with ipratropium bromide attenuated the histamine-induced bronchoconstriction, suggesting that airway effects of histamine, in part, are vagally mediated. These data suggest that prior muscarinic stimulation has a protective effect on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in normal subjects and the absence of this inhibitory effect in asthmatic patients may represent loss of a protective muscarinic receptor mechanism.

摘要

我们研究了以下假设

预先进行气道毒蕈碱受体刺激(使用雾化的乙酰甲胆碱)会改变对组胺的支气管收缩反应,而组胺的支气管收缩反应部分是由迷走神经介导的。在四个不同的实验日,对15名受试者(9名正常人及6名哮喘患者)以随机方式进行了以下乙酰甲胆碱和组胺吸入激发试验的组合:乙酰甲胆碱-组胺、组胺-乙酰甲胆碱、乙酰甲胆碱-乙酰甲胆碱和组胺-组胺。估计每种激动剂导致气道特异性传导率(SGaw)降低50%时的累积激发剂量(PD50)。第二次激发试验在第一次激发试验后约1小时进行,此时SGaw已恢复至基线水平。在正常受试者中,预先用乙酰甲胆碱进行毒蕈碱刺激可抑制随后对组胺的支气管收缩反应(平均±标准误,组胺的PD50从13.7±3.1增加至28.4±7.2呼吸单位),而不改变对乙酰甲胆碱的支气管收缩反应。在哮喘患者中,预先接触乙酰甲胆碱未能改变对组胺和乙酰甲胆碱的支气管收缩反应。相比之下,预先用组胺激发在正常人和哮喘患者中均未改变随后对组胺和乙酰甲胆碱的支气管收缩反应。用异丙托溴铵预处理可减轻组胺诱导的支气管收缩,提示组胺对气道的作用部分是由迷走神经介导的。这些数据表明,预先进行毒蕈碱刺激对正常受试者组胺诱导的支气管收缩具有保护作用,而哮喘患者缺乏这种抑制作用可能代表保护性毒蕈碱受体机制的丧失。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验