Suppr超能文献

利用减压应激的多普勒分析对塔斯马尼亚水产养殖业反弹潜水时间表进行现场验证。

Field validation of Tasmania's aquaculture industry bounce-diving schedules using Doppler analysis of decompression stress.

作者信息

Smart David R, Van den Broek Cory, Nishi Ron, Cooper P David, Eastman David

机构信息

Faculty of Heath Sciences, University of Tasmania, Department of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine Royal Hobart Hospital Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia, Phone: +61-(03)-6222-8193, Fax: +61-(03)-6222-7268, E-mail:

Department of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania.

出版信息

Diving Hyperb Med. 2014 Sep;44(3):124-36.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tasmania's aquaculture industry produces over 40,000 tonnes of fish annually, valued at over AUD500M. Aquaculture divers perform repetitive, short-duration bounce dives in fish pens to depths up to 21 metres' sea water (msw). Past high levels of decompression illness (DCI) may have resulted from these 'yo-yo' dives. This study aimed to assess working divers, using Doppler ultrasonic bubble detection, to determine if yo-yo diving was a risk factor for DCI, determine dive profiles with acceptable risk and investigate productivity improvement.

METHODS

Field data were collected from working divers during bounce diving at marine farms near Hobart, Australia. Ascent rates were less than 18 m·min⁻¹, with routine safety stops (3 min at 3 msw) during the final ascent. The Kisman-Masurel method was used to grade bubbling post dive as a means of assessing decompression stress. In accordance with Defence Research and Development Canada Toronto practice, dives were rejected as excessive risk if more than 50% of scores were over Grade 2.

RESULTS

From 2002 to 2008, Doppler data were collected from 150 bounce-dive series (55 divers, 1,110 bounces). Three series of bounce profiles, characterized by in-water times, were validated: 13-15 msw, 10 bounces inside 75 min; 16-18 msw, six bounces inside 50 min; and 19-21 msw, four bounces inside 35 min. All had median bubble grades of 0. Further evaluation validated two successive series of bounces. Bubble grades were consistent with low-stress dive profiles. Bubble grades did not correlate with the number of bounces, but did correlate with ascent rate and in-water time.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest bounce diving was not a major factor causing DCI in Tasmanian aquaculture divers. Analysis of field data has improved industry productivity by increasing the permissible number of bounces, compared to earlier empirically-derived tables, without compromising safety. The recommended Tasmanian Bounce Diving Tables provide guidance for bounce diving to a depth of 21 msw, and two successive bounce dive series in a day's diving.

摘要

引言

塔斯马尼亚的水产养殖业每年生产超过40000吨鱼类,价值超过5亿澳元。水产养殖潜水员在鱼笼中进行重复性、短时间的跳跃潜水,深度可达21米海水深度(msw)。过去较高的减压病(DCI)发生率可能源于这些“溜溜球”式潜水。本研究旨在使用多普勒超声气泡检测评估在职潜水员,以确定跳跃潜水是否是DCI的风险因素,确定具有可接受风险的潜水剖面,并研究提高生产力的方法。

方法

在澳大利亚霍巴特附近的海洋养殖场,从在职潜水员进行跳跃潜水时收集现场数据。上升速度小于18米·分钟⁻¹,在最后上升过程中有常规安全停留(在3米海水深度停留3分钟)。采用基斯曼-马苏雷尔方法对潜水后气泡进行分级,作为评估减压压力的一种手段。根据加拿大国防研究与发展部多伦多的做法,如果超过50%的分数超过2级,则该潜水被视为风险过高而被拒绝。

结果

从2002年到2008年,收集了150个跳跃潜水系列(55名潜水员,1110次跳跃)的多普勒数据。验证了三个以水中时间为特征的跳跃剖面系列:13 - 15米海水深度,75分钟内10次跳跃;16 - 18米海水深度,50分钟内6次跳跃;19 - 21米海水深度,35分钟内4次跳跃。所有这些系列的气泡分级中位数均为0。进一步评估验证了两个连续的跳跃系列。气泡分级与低压力潜水剖面一致。气泡分级与跳跃次数无关,但与上升速度和水中时间有关。

结论

这些数据表明,跳跃潜水不是塔斯马尼亚水产养殖潜水员发生DCI的主要因素。与早期凭经验得出的表格相比,通过分析现场数据增加了允许的跳跃次数,提高了行业生产力,同时不影响安全性。推荐的塔斯马尼亚跳跃潜水表为21米海水深度的跳跃潜水以及一天潜水过程中的两个连续跳跃潜水系列提供了指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验