Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
The Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA.
Surv Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):82-5. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
The accreditation of graduate medical education through the evaluation of residency programs and the teaching hospitals that offer them in the United States is the primary mission of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). In 1999, the ACGME formulated the six ACGME competencies and, ten years later, developed a multi-year plan to restructure the accreditation process in order to assess educational outcomes. The result of these evolving efforts has been termed the Next Accreditation System (NAS). The stated goals of the NAS are 1) to enhance the ability of the peer-review system to prepare physicians for practice in the 21st century; 2) to accelerate the ACGME's movement toward accreditation on the basis of educational outcomes; and 3) to reduce the burden associated with the current structure and process-based approach. The NAS is an interesting and novel approach to re-engineer the GME accreditation process to become more equitable, fair, and transparent and less costly and burdensome, and to improve resident education and ultimately patient care. The new process will rely upon measurable and meaningful outcomes rather than simply structure and process assessments. Instead of the episodic program biopsies with site visitor reports, detailed program information forms, and formal residency review committee evaluations that characterized the old accreditation system, the NAS will be based upon annual reports of specific quantitative, trended, performance benchmarks; the ACGME milestones; and an institutional clinical competency committee. In addition, a separate but related specialty-specific Clinical Environment Learning Review (CLER) will be a more detailed examination of the learning environment and infrastructure. The CLER, however, will not have a direct role in the accreditation decision-making process of the NAS.
美国的研究生医学教育认证通过对住院医师培训计划和提供这些计划的教学医院的评估来实现,这是研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的主要任务。1999 年,ACGME 制定了六项 ACGME 能力,并在十年后制定了一项多年计划,以重组认证流程,评估教育成果。这些不断发展的努力的结果被称为下一个认证系统(NAS)。NAS 的既定目标是:1)提高同行评审系统为 21 世纪实践做好医生准备的能力;2)加速 ACGME 在教育成果基础上进行认证的进程;3)减少与当前结构和基于流程的方法相关的负担。NAS 是一种有趣而新颖的方法,可以重新设计 GME 认证流程,使其更加公平、公正、透明,成本更低,负担更小,并改善住院医师教育,最终改善患者护理。新流程将依赖于可衡量和有意义的成果,而不仅仅是结构和流程评估。NAS 将基于特定的定量、趋势、绩效基准的年度报告,而不是旧认证系统中以阶段性计划活检、现场访问者报告、详细计划信息表格和正式住院医师审查委员会评估为特征的方式,来取代这种方式。此外,机构临床能力委员会将对学习环境和基础设施进行更详细的检查,这是一个独立但相关的专业特定的临床环境学习审查(CLER)。然而,CLER 在 NAS 的认证决策过程中不会发挥直接作用。