• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

描述药物难治性局灶性癫痫随机对照试验中安慰剂治疗患者的不良事件特征。

Characterization of the adverse events profile of placebo-treated patients in randomized controlled trials on drug-resistant focal epilepsies.

机构信息

Unit of Neurology Department of Medicine Florence Health Authority, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Via Di Torregalli n 3, 50143, Florence, Italy,

出版信息

J Neurol. 2015 Jun;262(6):1401-6. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7535-0. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00415-014-7535-0
PMID:25311571
Abstract

In epilepsy trials a substantial proportion of patients receiving placebo has some improvement or experience adverse events (AEs) which match those related to active drug. The characterization of factors influencing these responses is crucial for a better comprehension of study results and to improve design of new trials. Seventy-one placebo-controlled, double-blind trials in drug-resistant focal epilepsies has been selected. The effect of multiple factors on some outcome measures were explored using a meta-regression model. For subjective and objective AEs, risk difference (RD) was calculated and entered in an inverse variance-weighted linear meta-regression model as independent variable to evaluate the relationship with data reported in placebo-treated patients. The number of study arms influence the percentage of patients withdrawing because of AEs and the highest dose of the experimental drug used in each RCT correlates with withdrawal because of AEs and with subjective AEs. Higher titration speed is associated with lower percentages of responders and higher reporting of both objective and subjective AEs. The correlation between proportions of placebo-treated patients with subjective and objective neurological AEs and relative RD, was significant (P = 0.002 r = 0.364 and P < 0.001 r = 0.650, respectively). Efficacy and tolerability outcomes of the placebo groups are intrinsically tied to the trial methodology and to the outcomes observed in patients treated with the active drug. The correlation for objective and subjective AEs between RD and the placebo-treated patients suggest that investigators are influenced by factors which operate within each specific trial.

摘要

在癫痫试验中,接受安慰剂的患者中有相当一部分有一定程度的改善或经历了与活性药物相关的不良反应 (AE)。因此,对影响这些反应的因素进行特征描述对于更好地理解研究结果和改进新试验的设计至关重要。本研究纳入了 71 项药物难治性局灶性癫痫的安慰剂对照、双盲试验。采用荟萃回归模型探讨了多种因素对某些结局指标的影响。对于主观和客观 AE,计算了风险差异 (RD),并将其作为自变量纳入逆方差加权线性荟萃回归模型中,以评估与安慰剂治疗患者报告的关系。研究臂的数量影响因 AE 而退出的患者比例,每个 RCT 中使用的实验药物的最高剂量与因 AE 而退出以及与主观 AE 相关。更高的滴定速度与反应者的比例较低和客观与主观 AE 的报告较高相关。安慰剂治疗患者中主观和客观神经 AE 的比例与相对 RD 之间存在显著相关性(P = 0.002 r = 0.364 和 P < 0.001 r = 0.650)。安慰剂组的疗效和耐受性结局与试验方法以及用活性药物治疗的患者中观察到的结局密切相关。RD 与安慰剂治疗患者之间的客观和主观 AE 的相关性表明,研究者受到每个特定试验中存在的因素的影响。

相似文献

1
Characterization of the adverse events profile of placebo-treated patients in randomized controlled trials on drug-resistant focal epilepsies.描述药物难治性局灶性癫痫随机对照试验中安慰剂治疗患者的不良事件特征。
J Neurol. 2015 Jun;262(6):1401-6. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7535-0. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
2
Adverse events of placebo-treated, drug-resistant, focal epileptic patients in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.随机对照试验中接受安慰剂治疗的耐药性局灶性癫痫患者的不良事件:一项系统评价。
J Neurol. 2015 Mar;262(3):501-15. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7391-y. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
3
Analysis of nocebo effects of antiepileptic drugs across different conditions.不同条件下抗癫痫药物的反安慰剂效应分析。
J Neurol. 2016 Jul;263(7):1274-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-8018-7. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
4
Adverse events, placebo and nocebo effects in placebo-treated paediatric patients with refractory focal epilepsies. Analysis of double-blind studies.安慰剂治疗的难治性局灶性癫痫患儿的不良事件、安慰剂和反安慰剂效应。双盲研究分析
Epilepsy Res. 2014 Dec;108(10):1685-93. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
5
Types, frequencies, and burden of nonspecific adverse events of drugs: analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials.药物非特异性不良事件的类型、频率及负担:随机安慰剂对照临床试验分析
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):731-741. doi: 10.1002/pds.4169. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
6
Placebo and nocebo responses in drug trials of epilepsy.癫痫药物试验中的安慰剂和反安慰剂反应。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Feb;43:128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
7
Incidence of Placebo Adverse Events in Randomized Clinical Trials of Targeted and Immunotherapy Cancer Drugs in the Adjuvant Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.辅助治疗中靶向和免疫治疗癌症药物的随机临床试验中安慰剂不良事件的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185617. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5617.
8
Neurological adverse events of new generation sodium blocker antiepileptic drugs. Meta-analysis of randomized, double-blinded studies with eslicarbazepine acetate, lacosamide and oxcarbazepine.新一代钠离子阻滞剂抗癫痫药物的神经系统不良事件。使用依佐加滨、拉科酰胺和奥卡西平的随机、双盲研究的荟萃分析。
Seizure. 2013 Sep;22(7):528-36. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
9
Placebo and nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis : A meta-analysis.安慰剂和反安慰剂反应在随机对照试验中的 Janus 激酶抑制剂单药治疗类风湿关节炎:一项荟萃分析。
Z Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;81(5):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s00393-021-00969-6. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
Nocebo effect in refractory partial epilepsy during pre-surgical monitoring: Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials.术前监测期间难治性部分性癫痫中的反安慰剂效应:安慰剂对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Seizure. 2017 Feb;45:95-99. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
European Headache Federation recommendations for placebo and nocebo terminology.欧洲头痛联合会关于安慰剂和反安慰剂术语的建议。
J Headache Pain. 2020 Sep 25;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01178-3.
2
Are Patients With More Prone to Manifest Nocebo-Like-Effects? A Meta-Analysis of Adverse Events in Placebo Groups of Double-Blind Antipsychotic Trials.更容易出现类反安慰剂效应的患者?双盲抗精神病药物试验安慰剂组不良事件的荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 17;10:502. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00502. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse events of placebo-treated, drug-resistant, focal epileptic patients in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.随机对照试验中接受安慰剂治疗的耐药性局灶性癫痫患者的不良事件:一项系统评价。
J Neurol. 2015 Mar;262(3):501-15. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7391-y. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
2
Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of the placebo effect in neurological and psychiatric conditions.神经和精神疾病中安慰剂效应的作用机制及治疗意义。
Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Dec;140(3):306-18. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Jul 21.
3
Mechanisms of the placebo response.
安慰剂效应的作用机制。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Oct;26(5):520-3. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
4
Nocebo as a potential confounding factor in clinical trials for Parkinson's disease treatment: a meta-analysis.尼沙可(Nocebo)作为帕金森病治疗临床试验中的一个潜在混杂因素:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Neurol. 2013 Mar;20(3):527-533. doi: 10.1111/ene.12014. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
5
Placebo and nocebo responses in randomised controlled trials of drugs applying for approval for fibromyalgia syndrome treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.安慰剂和反安慰剂效应在申请治疗纤维肌痛综合征药物的随机对照试验中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6 Suppl 74):78-87. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
6
What clinical trial designs have been used to test antiepileptic drugs and do we need to change them?哪些临床试验设计被用于测试抗癫痫药物,我们是否需要改变它们?
Epileptic Disord. 2012 Jun;14(2):124-31. doi: 10.1684/epd.2012.0511.
7
The adverse event profile of lacosamide: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.拉科酰胺的不良事件谱:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Epilepsia. 2013 Jan;54(1):66-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03589.x. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
8
The adverse event profile of pregabalin across different disorders: a meta-analysis.普瑞巴林在不同疾病中的不良反应特征:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jun;68(6):903-12. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1213-x. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
9
Nocebo in fibromyalgia: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials and implications for practice.纤维肌痛中的反安慰剂效应:安慰剂对照临床试验的荟萃分析及其对实践的影响。
Eur J Neurol. 2012 May;19(5):672-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03528.x. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
10
The nocebo effect and its relevance for clinical practice.安慰剂效应及其与临床实践的相关性。
Psychosom Med. 2011 Sep;73(7):598-603. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182294a50. Epub 2011 Aug 23.