Suppr超能文献

不同条件下抗癫痫药物的反安慰剂效应分析。

Analysis of nocebo effects of antiepileptic drugs across different conditions.

作者信息

Zaccara Gaetano, Giovannelli Fabio, Giorgi Filippo Sean, Franco Valentina, Gasparini Sara

机构信息

Unit of Neurology, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Department of Medicine, Florence Health Authority, Via Di Torregalli n 3, 50143, Florence, Italy.

Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2016 Jul;263(7):1274-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-8018-7. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the nocebo effect in all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the effect of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the clinical conditions in which these compounds have been studied with the exception of epilepsy. We searched for all double-blind, placebo-controlled trials performed in adult patients, testing AEDs in any clinical condition except epilepsy. The following data were extracted from the placebo arms: the number of randomized patients, the number of patients withdrawing because of adverse effects (AEs), and the number of patients with 11 predefined AEs (dizziness, ataxia/coordination abnormal, diplopia, somnolence, fatigue, headache, memory impairment, tremor, abnormal thinking, anxiety and depression). Outcome measures were the percentages of patients whithdrawing due to AEs and reporting the selected AEs. RCTs included in the analysis were grouped in six main categories of clinical conditions (pain, movement disorders, psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, obesity and binge eating disorders, and miscellanea). Proportions of patients with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) have been calculated for all reported outcome measures. Thirteen AEDs were studied and the total number of selected RCTs was 157. Significant percentages of placebo-treated patients withdrawing due to AEs and with specific AEs were observed in several cases. Significant differences emerged across different conditions. Comparisons with results of a previous meta-analysis on all RCTs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies showed that ataxia, diplopia and fatigue were significantly more frequent, and patients withdrawing were significantly less frequent, in placebo-treated epileptic patients. Significant differences have been identified in the AEDs-induced nocebo effect across different conditions. Placebo-treated epilepsy patients have significantly more frequent neurological AEs.

摘要

本研究的目的是在所有探索抗癫痫药物(AEDs)在除癫痫之外已开展相关研究的临床病症中的疗效的随机对照试验(RCTs)中评估反安慰剂效应。我们检索了所有针对成年患者开展的双盲、安慰剂对照试验,这些试验在除癫痫之外的任何临床病症中测试AEDs。从安慰剂组中提取了以下数据:随机分组的患者数量、因不良反应(AEs)退出的患者数量以及患有11种预先定义的AE(头晕、共济失调/协调异常、复视、嗜睡、疲劳、头痛、记忆障碍、震颤、思维异常、焦虑和抑郁)的患者数量。结局指标为因AE退出以及报告所选AE的患者百分比。纳入分析的RCTs被分为六个主要临床病症类别(疼痛、运动障碍、精神障碍、药物滥用、肥胖和暴饮暴食症以及杂项)。已针对所有报告的结局指标计算了95%置信区间(CIs)的患者比例。研究了13种AEDs,所选RCTs的总数为157项。在若干病例中观察到安慰剂治疗的患者因AE退出以及出现特定AE的比例显著。不同病症之间出现了显著差异。与先前一项关于耐药性癫痫患者所有RCTs的荟萃分析结果相比,在安慰剂治疗的癫痫患者中,共济失调、复视和疲劳显著更常见,而退出的患者显著更少。已确定不同病症中AEDs诱导的反安慰剂效应存在显著差异。安慰剂治疗的癫痫患者出现神经系统AE的频率显著更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验