• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验中接受安慰剂治疗的耐药性局灶性癫痫患者的不良事件:一项系统评价。

Adverse events of placebo-treated, drug-resistant, focal epileptic patients in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.

作者信息

Zaccara Gaetano, Giovannelli Fabio, Cincotta Massimo, Loiacono Giulia, Verrotti Alberto

机构信息

Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Florence Health Authority, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Via Di Torregalli n 3, 50143, Florence, Italy,

出版信息

J Neurol. 2015 Mar;262(3):501-15. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7391-y. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00415-014-7391-y
PMID:24916828
Abstract

Health-related quality of life of patients with epilepsy is heavily influenced by antiepileptic drug (AED) tolerability. However, an accepted method for precise assessment of AED-induced adverse events (AEs) has not yet been established. Assessment of tolerability and of the frequency of predefined AEs among drug-resistant epilepsy patients through an analysis of placebo-treated patients from randomized controlled studies (RCTs) performed in patients with partial onset epilepsies (POS) and evaluation of factors which may influence the occurrence of AEs in these patients are the objectives of this study. We searched all double-blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating any AED on adult patients with POS and extracted both for patients treated with placebo and for those treated with the active drug, number of patients, number of responders, number of patients withdrawing because of AEs, number of patients with AEs, and number of patients with 11 predefined AEs. We also explored the effect of multiple factors on AEs reporting. Seventy-nine RCTs were included in our study with 12,594 patients, 6,793 of whom randomized to placebo. In placebo-treated patients, overall responder rate was 15.2 %, proportion of placebo-treated patients withdrawing because of AEs was 3.9 %, and proportion of patients with AE was 60.3 %. The four most frequently reported AEs were headache (12.4 %) somnolence (8.6 %), dizziness (8.2 %), and fatigue (7.9 %). Several factors were found to influence these outcomes. Several factors influence AEs' appearance in RCTs. Among the most important, we found the expectations of patients and doctors and their attitudes on the positive or negative effect of a drug.

摘要

癫痫患者的健康相关生活质量受抗癫痫药物(AED)耐受性的严重影响。然而,尚未建立一种精确评估AED所致不良事件(AE)的公认方法。本研究的目的是通过分析部分性发作癫痫(POS)患者随机对照研究(RCT)中接受安慰剂治疗的患者,评估耐药性癫痫患者中AED耐受性及预定义AE的发生频率,并评估可能影响这些患者AE发生的因素。我们检索了所有针对成年POS患者研究任何AED的双盲、安慰剂对照试验,并提取了接受安慰剂治疗患者和接受活性药物治疗患者的患者数量、有效者数量、因AE退出的患者数量、发生AE的患者数量以及发生11种预定义AE的患者数量。我们还探讨了多种因素对AE报告的影响。我们的研究纳入了79项RCT,共12594例患者,其中6793例随机接受安慰剂治疗。在接受安慰剂治疗的患者中,总体有效率为15.2%,因AE退出的安慰剂治疗患者比例为3.9%,发生AE的患者比例为60.3%。报告最频繁的四种AE为头痛(12.4%)、嗜睡(8.6%)、头晕(8.2%)和疲劳(7.9%)。发现有几个因素会影响这些结果。在RCT中,有几个因素会影响AE的出现。其中最重要的是,我们发现患者和医生的期望以及他们对药物正负效应的态度。

相似文献

1
Adverse events of placebo-treated, drug-resistant, focal epileptic patients in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.随机对照试验中接受安慰剂治疗的耐药性局灶性癫痫患者的不良事件:一项系统评价。
J Neurol. 2015 Mar;262(3):501-15. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7391-y. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
2
Rufinamide add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy.鲁非酰胺辅助治疗难治性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;4(4):CD011772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011772.pub2.
3
Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.月经性(与月经相关)癫痫发作的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):CD013225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013225.pub3.
4
Brivaracetam add-on therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy.添加布瓦西坦治疗耐药性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 14;3(3):CD011501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011501.pub3.
5
Lamotrigine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.拉莫三嗪添加治疗耐药性部分性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 22;2016(6):CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub2.
6
Levetiracetam add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: an updated Cochrane Review.左乙拉西坦添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫:Cochrane系统评价的更新版
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub2.
7
Carisbamate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.卡马西平添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 6;12(12):CD012121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012121.pub2.
8
Felbamate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.添加氨己烯酸治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 1;8(8):CD008295. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008295.pub6.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Pregabalin add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.普瑞巴林添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD005612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005612.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-evaluating the placebo response in recent canine dietary epilepsy trials.重新评估最近犬类饮食性癫痫试验中的安慰剂反应。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 May 24;20(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04066-z.
2
Quantifying and controlling the impact of regression to the mean on randomized controlled trials in epilepsy.量化和控制回归均值对癫痫随机对照试验的影响。
Epilepsia. 2023 Oct;64(10):2635-2643. doi: 10.1111/epi.17730. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
3
Critical Appraisal of Cenobamate as Adjunctive Treatment of Focal Seizures in Adults.西苯唑胺作为成人局灶性癫痫辅助治疗的批判性评价

本文引用的文献

1
Nocebo as a potential confounding factor in clinical trials for Parkinson's disease treatment: a meta-analysis.尼沙可(Nocebo)作为帕金森病治疗临床试验中的一个潜在混杂因素:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Neurol. 2013 Mar;20(3):527-533. doi: 10.1111/ene.12014. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
2
Adjunctive perampanel for refractory partial-onset seizures: randomized phase III study 304.添加普瑞巴林辅助治疗耐药部分发作性癫痫:随机 III 期研究 304。
Neurology. 2012 Aug 7;79(6):589-96. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182635735. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
3
Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Nov 30;17:3447-3457. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S281490. eCollection 2021.
4
A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidivarin as Add-on Therapy in Participants with Inadequately Controlled Focal Seizures.大麻二酚作为附加治疗在局灶性癫痫发作控制不佳的参与者中的疗效和安全性的 2 期随机对照试验。
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2021 Dec;6(6):528-536. doi: 10.1089/can.2020.0075. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
5
Natural variability in seizure frequency: Implications for trials and placebo.发作频率的自然变异性:对试验和安慰剂的影响。
Epilepsy Res. 2020 May;162:106306. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106306. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
6
Are Patients With More Prone to Manifest Nocebo-Like-Effects? A Meta-Analysis of Adverse Events in Placebo Groups of Double-Blind Antipsychotic Trials.更容易出现类反安慰剂效应的患者?双盲抗精神病药物试验安慰剂组不良事件的荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 17;10:502. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00502. eCollection 2019.
7
Tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: a network meta-analysis.新型抗癫痫药物的耐受性:一项网状荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jul;73(7):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2245-z. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
The New Antiepileptic Drugs: Their Neuropharmacology and Clinical Indications.新型抗癫痫药物:其神经药理学与临床适应证
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2016 May 15;56(5):205-20. doi: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2015-0344. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
9
Response to placebo in clinical epilepsy trials--Old ideas and new insights.临床癫痫试验中对安慰剂的反应——旧观念与新见解
Epilepsy Res. 2016 May;122:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
10
Analysis of nocebo effects of antiepileptic drugs across different conditions.不同条件下抗癫痫药物的反安慰剂效应分析。
J Neurol. 2016 Jul;263(7):1274-9. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-8018-7. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
抗癫痫药物的不良反应。
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Sep;11(9):792-802. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70153-9. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
4
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
5
Reporting of adverse events in randomised controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs using the CONSORT criteria for reporting harms.根据 CONSORT 损害报告标准报告抗癫痫药物随机对照试验中的不良事件。
Epilepsy Res. 2011 Nov;97(1-2):20-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.06.015. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
6
Nocebo in fibromyalgia: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials and implications for practice.纤维肌痛中的反安慰剂效应:安慰剂对照临床试验的荟萃分析及其对实践的影响。
Eur J Neurol. 2012 May;19(5):672-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03528.x. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
7
A meta-analytic approach to estimating nocebo effects in neuropathic pain trials.一种估计神经性疼痛试验中反安慰剂效应的荟萃分析方法。
J Neurol. 2012 Mar;259(3):436-47. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6197-4. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
9
The placebo response in clinical trials: more questions than answers.临床试验中的安慰剂效应:问题多于答案。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 27;366(1572):1889-95. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0384.
10
Factors determining response to antiepileptic drugs in randomized controlled trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis.影响抗癫痫药物反应的因素:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Epilepsia. 2011 Feb;52(2):219-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02915.x. Epub 2011 Jan 26.