• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

子宫颈筛查的自我采样:它能否克服巴氏试验的一些障碍?

Self-sampling for cervical screening: could it overcome some of the barriers to the Pap test?

作者信息

Mullins Robyn, Scalzo Katherine, Sultana Farhana

机构信息

Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer.

Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2014 Dec;21(4):201-6. doi: 10.1177/0969141314555247. Epub 2014 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1177/0969141314555247
PMID:25312640
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine which groups of women would be most likely to take part in self-sampling for cervical screening, and what they perceive as the key barriers and benefits to self-sampling.

METHODS

A random sample of 3000 women aged 18-69 in Victoria, Australia, were asked questions about "taking their own Pap test" in a telephone survey about cervical screening; 2526 answered the questions about self-sampling. The terminology "Pap test" was used in questions, due to the very low understanding of HPV and its link to cervical cancer.

RESULTS

One-third of women (34.0%) indicated they would prefer to self-sample, 57.2% would not and 8.7% were unsure. Preference for self-sampling was significantly stronger among women who had not had a Pap test for more than three years (64.8%, p < .001) or who had never had one (62.1%, p < .001), compared with those up-to-date (27.0%). Convenience was a key benefit (37.8%), as was less embarrassment (31.5%). For those who did not want to self-sample or were unsure, key factors included professionals being more skilled (53.4% and 28.2% respectively), and doubts about being able to do it properly (28.9% and 23.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-sampling was most popular among women who needed to have a Pap test, and could potentially reach some women who are not participating appropriately in cervical screening. Key barriers to participation could be addressed by providing information about the test being for HPV, and being easier to do properly than a Pap test.

摘要

目的

确定哪些女性群体最有可能参与宫颈筛查的自我采样,以及她们认为自我采样的主要障碍和益处是什么。

方法

在澳大利亚维多利亚州,对3000名年龄在18至69岁的女性进行随机抽样,在一项关于宫颈筛查的电话调查中询问她们关于“自行进行巴氏试验”的问题;2526人回答了关于自我采样的问题。由于对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)及其与宫颈癌的联系了解甚少,问题中使用了“巴氏试验”这一术语。

结果

三分之一的女性(34.0%)表示她们更愿意自我采样,57.2%的女性不愿意,8.7%的女性不确定。与定期进行巴氏试验的女性(27.0%)相比,超过三年未进行巴氏试验的女性(64.8%,p <.001)或从未进行过巴氏试验的女性(62.1%,p <.001)对自我采样的偏好明显更强。便利性是一个关键益处(37.8%),减少尴尬也是如此(31.5%)。对于那些不想自我采样或不确定的人来说,关键因素包括专业人员更有技能(分别为53.4%和28.2%),以及对能否正确操作存在疑虑(28.9%和23.6%)。

结论

自我采样在需要进行巴氏试验的女性中最受欢迎,并且有可能覆盖到一些未适当参与宫颈筛查的女性。可以通过提供有关该检测是针对HPV以及比巴氏试验更容易正确操作的信息来解决参与的主要障碍。

相似文献

1
Self-sampling for cervical screening: could it overcome some of the barriers to the Pap test?子宫颈筛查的自我采样:它能否克服巴氏试验的一些障碍?
J Med Screen. 2014 Dec;21(4):201-6. doi: 10.1177/0969141314555247. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
2
Women's experience with home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing.女性在家中人乳头瘤病毒检测的自我采样体验。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 4;15:849. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1804-x.
3
Attitudes and factors affecting acceptability of self-administered cervicovaginal sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping as an alternative to Pap testing among multiethnic Malaysian women.在马来西亚多民族女性中,影响自我采集宫颈阴道样本进行人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)基因分型以替代巴氏试验的可接受性的态度和因素。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 4;6(8):e011022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-011022.
4
Evaluation of satisfaction with three different cervical cancer screening modalities: clinician-collected Pap test vs. HPV test by self-sampling vs. HPV test by urine sampling.三种不同宫颈癌筛查方式的满意度评估:临床医生采集的巴氏涂片检测与自我采样 HPV 检测和尿液采样 HPV 检测的比较。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;30(5):e76. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e76.
5
Rationale and design of the iPap trial: a randomized controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for improving participation in cervical screening by never- and under-screened women in Australia.iPap 试验的原理和设计:澳大利亚一项基于家庭的 HPV 自我采样对从未接受过或未接受过宫颈癌筛查的女性参与宫颈癌筛查的影响的随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Mar 19;14:207. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-207.
6
Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.农村筛查不足女性人乳头瘤病毒检测自我采样的随机干预:筛查接受情况与可接受性
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 May;25(5):489-97. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5348. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
7
Attitudes toward self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among primary care attendees living on the US-Mexico border.居住在美国-墨西哥边境的初级保健就诊者对宫颈癌筛查自我采样的态度。
South Med J. 2014 Jul;107(7):426-32. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000132.
8
Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences Among Trans-Masculine Individuals: Patient-Collected Human Papillomavirus Vaginal Swabs Versus Provider-Administered Pap Tests.跨性别男性个体的宫颈癌筛查偏好:患者自行采集的人乳头瘤病毒阴道拭子与医生进行的巴氏涂片检查。
LGBT Health. 2017 Aug;4(4):252-259. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2016.0187. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
9
Muslim immigrant women's views on cervical cancer screening and HPV self-sampling in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省穆斯林移民女性对宫颈癌筛查和人乳头瘤病毒自我采样的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3564-1.
10
Knowledge about cervical cancer, Pap test, and barriers to women's participation in screening in Belgrade, Serbia.关于塞尔维亚贝尔格莱德地区宫颈癌、巴氏试验以及女性参与筛查的障碍的知识。
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2017;38(1):69-75.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of Self-Sampling for Cervical Screening in Ethnically Diverse Groups in Northwest England: A Focus Group Study.英格兰西北部不同种族群体中宫颈筛查自我采样的可接受性:一项焦点小组研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70338. doi: 10.1111/hex.70338.
2
A pay-it-forward approach to improve feedback rate of HPV-based self-sampling in cervical cancer screening among women in ethnic minority regions of China: a randomized controlled trial protocol.一种在中国少数民族地区宫颈癌筛查中采用“传递善意”方法提高基于人乳头瘤病毒的自我采样反馈率的随机对照试验方案。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 29;16:1586076. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1586076. eCollection 2025.
3
Are we ready for self-sampling for cervical cancer screening? Insights from service providers and policy makers in Nepal.
我们准备好进行宫颈癌筛查的自我采样了吗?来自尼泊尔服务提供者和政策制定者的见解。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 10;5(1):e0004114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004114. eCollection 2025.
4
Randomized experimental population-based study to evaluate the acceptance and completion of and preferences for cervical cancer screening.随机实验性基于人群的研究,评估宫颈癌筛查的接受度、完成度和偏好。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 9;19(8):e0306130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306130. eCollection 2024.
5
Feasibility and applicability of self-sampling based online cervical cancer screening: findings from the China online cervical cancer screening trial.基于自我采样的在线宫颈癌筛查的可行性与适用性:中国在线宫颈癌筛查试验的结果
Infect Agent Cancer. 2024 Apr 25;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13027-024-00583-6.
6
Sexual orientation and gender identity inequities in cervical cancer screening by race and ethnicity.种族和民族群体在宫颈癌筛查中存在的性取向和性别认同不平等现象。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Jan;35(1):133-151. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01771-2. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
7
-Key Stakeholder Perspectives on the Initial Implementation of Self-Collection in Australia's Cervical Screening Program: A Qualitative Study.关键利益相关者对澳大利亚宫颈癌筛查计划中自我采样初始实施的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 27;19(23):15776. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315776.
8
Widening the offer of human papillomavirus self-sampling to all women eligible for cervical screening: Make haste slowly.向所有符合宫颈癌筛查条件的女性广泛提供人乳头瘤病毒自我采样服务:欲速则不达。
Int J Cancer. 2023 Jul 1;153(1):8-19. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34358. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
9
What do South Asian immigrant women know about HPV, cervical cancer and its early detection: A cross-sectional Australian study.南亚移民女性对人乳头瘤病毒、宫颈癌及其早期检测了解多少:一项澳大利亚横断面研究。
J Migr Health. 2022 Apr 8;5:100102. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100102. eCollection 2022.
10
Self-sampling for cervical screening offered at the point of invitation: A cross-sectional study of preferences in England.在邀请时提供宫颈筛查的自我采样:英格兰偏好的横断面研究。
J Med Screen. 2022 Sep;29(3):194-202. doi: 10.1177/09691413221092246. Epub 2022 Apr 7.