Lawson Rachel A, Papadakis Alison A, Higginson Christopher I, Barnett Jeffrey E, Wills Meagan C, Strang John F, Wallace Gregory L, Kenworthy Lauren
Department of Psychology, Loyola University Maryland.
Center for Autism Spectrum Disorders, Children's National Medical Center.
Neuropsychology. 2015 May;29(3):445-53. doi: 10.1037/neu0000145. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) both have psychiatric comorbidities and distinctive profiles of executive dysfunction. Although there is evidence that executive function (EF) plays a role in the expression of specific behaviors and psychiatric symptoms, it is not known whether specific EF deficits in ASD and ADHD may be pathways to comorbidities in the disorders. This study examines whether parent reported problems with flexibility in ASD and inhibition in ADHD mediate the disorders' associations with anxiety/depression and oppositional/aggressive behavior, respectively.
Parent report data from the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) were obtained for 125 children (70 ASD, 55 ADHD Hyperactive/Impulsive or Combined type) as part of a neuropsychological assessment. Diagnostic status, BRIEF Shift (shifting/flexibility) and Inhibit (behavioral inhibition) scale scores, and CBCL Anxious/Depressed (anxiety/depression) and Aggressive Behavior (oppositionality/aggression) scale scores were analyzed with a path analysis to investigate the relation of flexibility and inhibition to comorbid symptoms in children with ASD and ADHD.
In a path model with good fit ASD predicted greater inflexibility which predicted greater anxiety/depression, while ADHD predicted greater disinhibition that predicted greater aggression, consistent with our mediational hypotheses. Unexpectedly, the greater inflexibility associated with ASD also predicted greater aggression.
Findings support the importance of everyday EF problems in ASD and ADHD as predictors of comorbid psychopathology and as crucial intervention targets for potential prevention and mitigation of comorbid symptoms.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)都存在精神共病以及独特的执行功能障碍特征。尽管有证据表明执行功能(EF)在特定行为和精神症状的表达中起作用,但尚不清楚ASD和ADHD中特定的EF缺陷是否可能是这些疾病共病的途径。本研究考察了家长报告的ASD中灵活性问题和ADHD中抑制问题是否分别介导了这些疾病与焦虑/抑郁以及对立/攻击行为之间的关联。
作为神经心理学评估的一部分,获取了125名儿童(70名ASD、55名ADHD多动/冲动型或混合型)的执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF)和儿童行为清单(CBCL)的家长报告数据。采用路径分析对诊断状态、BRIEF转换(转换/灵活性)和抑制(行为抑制)量表得分以及CBCL焦虑/抑郁(焦虑/抑郁)和攻击行为(对立性/攻击性)量表得分进行分析,以研究灵活性和抑制与ASD和ADHD儿童共病症状之间的关系。
在一个拟合良好的路径模型中,ASD预测了更大的灵活性缺乏,而这又预测了更高的焦虑/抑郁水平;ADHD预测了更大的去抑制,进而预测了更高的攻击性,这与我们的中介假设一致。出乎意料的是,与ASD相关的更大的灵活性缺乏也预测了更高的攻击性。
研究结果支持了ASD和ADHD中日常EF问题作为共病精神病理学预测指标的重要性,以及作为潜在预防和减轻共病症状的关键干预靶点的重要性。