Suppr超能文献

[局部区域麻醉下的颈动脉手术]

[Carotid surgery under locoregional anesthesia].

作者信息

Goëau-Brissonnière O, Bacourt F, Renier J F, Chauvin M, Terestchenko M C, Hardy C, Tavakoli R, Guirimand F, Patel J C

机构信息

Service de Chirurgie générale, digestive et vasculaire, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne.

出版信息

Presse Med. 1989 Nov 11;18(37):1831-5.

PMID:2531401
Abstract

Eight-five carotid endarterectomies were performed in 77 patients, under regional anaesthesia using 2 different techniques: cervical epidural anaesthesia (35 cases) and cervical plexus block (50 cases). The patients' mean age was 71 years; 80 per cent had arterial hypertension and 41 per cent coronary disease. Transoperative cerebral ischaemia was detected by a 5-minute carotid clamping test, the occurrence of a neurological event indicating that shunting was required. In 62 patients this test was combined with measurement of carotid back pressure. None of the patients needed general anaesthesia. Intraoperative neurological events occurred more frequently (P less than 0.01) when the carotid back pressure was 25 mmHg or less, and 12 temporary shunts were installed for that reason (14.1 per cent). Three neurological events occurred at the end of endarterectomy: no shunt was installed and complete recovery was observed immediately after declamping. No complications ascribable to the anesthetic techniques were recorded. Mortality was nil, and the only neurological morbidity was a brachio-facial deficit which left few sequelae. The frequency of intra- or postoperative arterial hypertension was similar in both groups. Intraoperative hypotension, frequent under epidural anaesthesia, was observed in only one patient who had brachial plexus block (P less than 0.01). The analgesia obtained was equally good with both anaesthetic techniques, but cervical plexus block anaesthesia is easier to perform, had less haemodynamic repercussions and therefore tends to be preferred to cervical epidural anaesthesia. The lack of mortality, low morbidity and absence of systemic complications in this series despite the high number of patients at risk are in favour of this type of anaesthesia, notably for such patients. Moreover, because vigilance is preserved attention can be paid to the quality rather than the rapidity of endarterectomy, which is the best way of preventing embolism.

摘要

对77例患者实施了85例颈动脉内膜切除术,采用两种不同的区域麻醉技术:颈段硬膜外麻醉(35例)和颈丛阻滞(50例)。患者的平均年龄为71岁;80%患有动脉高血压,41%患有冠心病。通过5分钟的颈动脉夹闭试验检测术中脑缺血,神经事件的发生表明需要分流。62例患者的该试验与颈动脉背压测量相结合。所有患者均无需全身麻醉。当颈动脉背压为25 mmHg或更低时,术中神经事件的发生率更高(P<0.01),因此安装了12个临时分流装置(14.1%)。在动脉内膜切除术后发生了3例神经事件:未安装分流装置,夹闭解除后立即观察到完全恢复。未记录到与麻醉技术相关的并发症。死亡率为零,唯一的神经并发症是臂面部功能缺损,几乎没有后遗症。两组术中或术后动脉高血压的发生率相似。仅1例接受臂丛阻滞的患者出现术中低血压,硬膜外麻醉时常见(P<0.01)。两种麻醉技术获得的镇痛效果同样良好,但颈丛阻滞麻醉操作更容易,对血流动力学的影响较小,因此比颈段硬膜外麻醉更受青睐。尽管高危患者数量众多,但本系列中无死亡、低发病率且无全身并发症,支持这种麻醉方式,特别是对于此类患者。此外,由于保持了警觉性,可以关注动脉内膜切除术的质量而非速度,这是预防栓塞的最佳方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验