de Arruda Guilherme Ferraz, Barbieri André Luiz, Rodríguez Pablo Martín, Rodrigues Francisco A, Moreno Yamir, Costa Luciano da Fontoura
Departamento de Matemática Aplicada e Estatística, Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação, Universidade de São Paulo, Campus de São Carlos, Caixa Postal 668, 13560-970 São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI) & Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain and Complex Networks and Systems Lagrange Lab, Institute for Scientific Interchange, Turin, Italy.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Sep;90(3):032812. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032812. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
The identification of the most influential spreaders in networks is important to control and understand the spreading capabilities of the system as well as to ensure an efficient information diffusion such as in rumorlike dynamics. Recent works have suggested that the identification of influential spreaders is not independent of the dynamics being studied. For instance, the key disease spreaders might not necessarily be so important when it comes to analyzing social contagion or rumor propagation. Additionally, it has been shown that different metrics (degree, coreness, etc.) might identify different influential nodes even for the same dynamical processes with diverse degrees of accuracy. In this paper, we investigate how nine centrality measures correlate with the disease and rumor spreading capabilities of the nodes in different synthetic and real-world (both spatial and nonspatial) networks. We also propose a generalization of the random walk accessibility as a new centrality measure and derive analytical expressions for the latter measure for simple network configurations. Our results show that for nonspatial networks, the k-core and degree centralities are the most correlated to epidemic spreading, whereas the average neighborhood degree, the closeness centrality, and accessibility are the most related to rumor dynamics. On the contrary, for spatial networks, the accessibility measure outperforms the rest of the centrality metrics in almost all cases regardless of the kind of dynamics considered. Therefore, an important consequence of our analysis is that previous studies performed in synthetic random networks cannot be generalized to the case of spatial networks.
识别网络中最具影响力的传播者对于控制系统的传播能力、理解其传播特性以及确保高效的信息扩散(如在类似谣言的动态传播中)至关重要。近期研究表明,有影响力传播者的识别并非独立于所研究的动态过程。例如,在分析社会传染或谣言传播时,关键的疾病传播者可能未必那么重要。此外,研究表明,即使对于相同的动态过程,不同的度量指标(度、核数等)可能会以不同的准确度识别出不同的有影响力节点。在本文中,我们研究了九种中心性度量如何与不同的合成网络和真实世界网络(包括空间网络和非空间网络)中节点的疾病传播和谣言传播能力相关联。我们还提出了一种对随机游走可达性的推广,作为一种新的中心性度量,并推导了简单网络配置下该度量的解析表达式。我们的结果表明,对于非空间网络,k - 核和度中心性与流行病传播的相关性最高,而平均邻域度、接近中心性和可达性与谣言动态的相关性最大。相反,对于空间网络,无论考虑何种动态过程,在几乎所有情况下,可达性度量都优于其他中心性度量。因此,我们分析的一个重要结论是,先前在合成随机网络中进行的研究不能推广到空间网络的情况。