• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The chronic injury glucose error grid: a tool to reduce diabetes complications.慢性损伤血糖误差网格:一种减少糖尿病并发症的工具。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jan;9(1):149-52. doi: 10.1177/1932296814554415. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
2
Why the Diabetes Technology Society Surveillance Protocol for Glucose Meters Needs to Be Revised.为何糖尿病技术协会血糖仪监测方案需要修订。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1247-1249. doi: 10.1177/1932296817702926. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
3
The surveillance error grid.监测误差网格。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):658-72. doi: 10.1177/1932296814539589. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
4
Performance of Blood Glucose Meters in the Low-Glucose Range: Current Evaluations Indicate That it is not Sufficient From a Clinical Point of View.血糖仪在低血糖范围内的性能:目前的评估表明,从临床角度来看,其性能并不充分。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Sep;38(9):e139-40. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0817. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
5
Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent System Lots Following ISO 15197:2013.依据ISO 15197:2013对采用三种试剂系统批次的CE标志血糖自我监测系统进行准确性评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Sep 22;10(1):238-9. doi: 10.1177/1932296815606471.
6
A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance.用于描述血糖监测仪性能的标准和统计数据综述。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jan 1;4(1):75-83. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400110.
7
Comparative Accuracy Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Meter With Novel Hematocrit Correction Technology, With Three Currently Used Commercially Available Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.采用新型血细胞比容校正技术的血糖仪与三种目前使用的市售血糖监测系统的比较准确性评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May;13(3):568-574. doi: 10.1177/1932296818821389. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
8
Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.在医院环境中,使用ISO 15197:2013准确性标准、共识和监测误差网格分析以及胰岛素剂量误差建模对三种血糖监测系统进行性能评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 7;10(1):85-92. doi: 10.1177/1932296815609368.
9
Introduction of a Novel Smartphone-Coupled Blood Glucose Monitoring System.新型智能手机联用血糖监测系统介绍
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1231-1233. doi: 10.1177/1932296817706594. Epub 2017 May 1.
10
System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.采用两种不同比较方法按照ISO 15197:2013对不同血糖监测系统进行系统准确性评估
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Sep;17(9):635-48. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0085. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Getting More Information From Glucose Meter Evaluations.从血糖仪评估中获取更多信息。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Nov;13(6):1175-1177. doi: 10.1177/1932296819842186. Epub 2019 May 7.
2
Why the Details of Glucose Meter Evaluations Matters.血糖仪评估细节为何重要。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May;13(3):559-560. doi: 10.1177/1932296818803113. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
3
Analysis of "Seven Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test-Strip Product".《血糖检测试纸产品临床性能七年监测分析》
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1163-1164. doi: 10.1177/1932296817730084. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
The surveillance error grid.监测误差网格。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):658-72. doi: 10.1177/1932296814539589. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
2
The Danger of Using Total Error Models to Compare Glucose Meter Performance.使用总误差模型比较血糖仪性能的风险
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Mar;8(2):419-421. doi: 10.1177/1932296813518673. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
3
Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers.七种常用血糖自我监测系统的性能变异性:患者和医护人员的临床考量
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Jan 1;7(1):144-52. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700117.
4
Towards more complete specifications for acceptable analytical performance - a plea for error grid analysis.为了更完整的规范可接受的分析性能——呼吁使用误差网格分析。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Jul;49(7):1127-30. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.610. Epub 2011 May 27.
5
Association of A1C and fasting plasma glucose levels with diabetic retinopathy prevalence in the U.S. population: Implications for diabetes diagnostic thresholds.美国人群中 A1C 和空腹血糖水平与糖尿病视网膜病变患病率的关联:对糖尿病诊断阈值的启示。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov;32(11):2027-32. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0440.
6
Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values.将糖化血红蛋白检测结果转化为估计的平均血糖值。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Aug;31(8):1473-8. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0545. Epub 2008 Jun 7.
7
Setting performance goals and evaluating total analytical error for diagnostic assays.设定诊断检测的性能目标并评估总分析误差。
Clin Chem. 2002 Jun;48(6 Pt 1):919-27.
8
Analytic bias specifications based on the analysis of effects on performance of medical guidelines.基于对医学指南实施效果分析的分析性偏倚规范。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999 Nov;59(7):509-12. doi: 10.1080/00365519950185247.

慢性损伤血糖误差网格:一种减少糖尿病并发症的工具。

The chronic injury glucose error grid: a tool to reduce diabetes complications.

作者信息

Krouwer Jan S, Cembrowski George S

机构信息

Krouwer Consulting, Sherborn, MA, USA

Alberta Health Services, Walter C. MacKenzie Center, Health Sciences Center, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jan;9(1):149-52. doi: 10.1177/1932296814554415. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1177/1932296814554415
PMID:25316713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4495547/
Abstract

Traditional glucose error grids provide error limits for glucose meters. These criteria help to assess the meter's suitability to prevent acute injury. We present a rationale for an error grid that provides a different set of error limits to help prevent chronic injury in diabetes. For example, glucose values in the no treatment zone of a traditional error grid could be harmful in diabetic retinopathy. The same method comparison data informs both the acute and chronic injury error grids. All of the data are used in an acute injury error grid, whereas only long-term biases populate a chronic injury error grid. These biases can be due to reagent lots and patient specific interferences. An example of a chronic injury glucose error grid is provided using simulated data.

摘要

传统的血糖误差网格为血糖仪提供误差限度。这些标准有助于评估血糖仪预防急性损伤的适用性。我们提出一种误差网格的基本原理,该误差网格提供一组不同的误差限度,以帮助预防糖尿病患者的慢性损伤。例如,传统误差网格中无需治疗区域的血糖值可能对糖尿病视网膜病变有害。相同的方法比较数据同时用于急性损伤和慢性损伤误差网格。所有数据都用于急性损伤误差网格,而只有长期偏差用于填充慢性损伤误差网格。这些偏差可能源于试剂批次和患者特定干扰。使用模拟数据给出了一个慢性损伤血糖误差网格的示例。