• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《血糖检测试纸产品临床性能七年监测分析》

Analysis of "Seven Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test-Strip Product".

作者信息

Krouwer Jan S

机构信息

1 Krouwer Consulting, Sherborn, MA USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1163-1164. doi: 10.1177/1932296817730084. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1177/1932296817730084
PMID:28905660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5951057/
Abstract

The article titled "Seven Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test-Strip Product" by Setford and coworkers in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology is an impressive study showing that over 7 years in three clinics, using multiple reagent lots, a total of 73 600 samples met the ISO 15197 2015 standard with no results in the D or E zones of a Parkes glucose meter error grid. Three requirements are suggested for a clinically acceptable glucose meter. The authors provide strong evidence for meeting two requirements but fail to provide summarized data about the number of nonnumeric results. Finally, the authors overstate some results, called "spin" by some which is not necessary. The superb results should stand on their own.

摘要

Setford及其同事在本期《糖尿病科学与技术杂志》上发表的题为《血糖试纸产品临床性能的七年监测》的文章是一项令人印象深刻的研究,表明在三家诊所进行的7年多时间里,使用多个试剂批次,共有73600个样本符合ISO 15197 2015标准,在帕克斯血糖仪误差网格的D区或E区没有出现结果。文章提出了临床可接受血糖仪的三个要求。作者为满足其中两个要求提供了有力证据,但未能提供关于非数字结果数量的汇总数据。最后,作者夸大了一些结果,有些人称之为“夸大”,这是没有必要的。卓越的结果应该靠自身站住脚。

相似文献

1
Analysis of "Seven Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test-Strip Product".《血糖检测试纸产品临床性能七年监测分析》
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1163-1164. doi: 10.1177/1932296817730084. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
2
Why the Diabetes Technology Society Surveillance Protocol for Glucose Meters Needs to Be Revised.为何糖尿病技术协会血糖仪监测方案需要修订。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1247-1249. doi: 10.1177/1932296817702926. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
3
Performance of two updated blood glucose monitoring systems: an evaluation following ISO 15197:2013.两种更新后的血糖监测系统的性能:遵循ISO 15197:2013的评估
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 May;32(5):847-55. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1146666. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
4
The surveillance error grid.监测误差网格。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):658-72. doi: 10.1177/1932296814539589. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
5
Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product.血糖试纸产品七年临床性能监测
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1177/1932296817703133. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
6
Introduction of a Novel Smartphone-Coupled Blood Glucose Monitoring System.新型智能手机联用血糖监测系统介绍
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1231-1233. doi: 10.1177/1932296817706594. Epub 2017 May 1.
7
Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked Glucometer System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent Lots Following ISO 15197:2013.依据ISO 15197:2013标准,对使用三批试剂进行血糖自我监测的CE标志血糖仪系统进行准确性评估。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):635-636. doi: 10.1177/1932296816670401. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
8
The clinical performance and ease of use of a blood glucose meter that uses a 10-test disk.一款使用10次测试盘的血糖仪的临床性能及易用性。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004 Aug;6(4):495-502. doi: 10.1089/1520915041705983.
9
System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.采用两种不同比较方法按照ISO 15197:2013对不同血糖监测系统进行系统准确性评估
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Sep;17(9):635-48. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0085. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
10
Evidence From a Long-Term, Systematic Post-Market Surveillance Program: Clinical Performance of a Hematocrit-Insensitive Blood Glucose Test Strip.长期、系统的上市后监测计划的证据:一种红细胞压积不敏感的血糖测试条的临床性能。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jan;15(1):67-75. doi: 10.1177/1932296819826968. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of "Spin" in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.过度解读研究结果:诊断准确性研究系统评价中的“歪曲”证据。
Clin Chem. 2017 Aug;63(8):1353-1362. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.271544. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
2
Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product.血糖试纸产品七年临床性能监测
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1177/1932296817703133. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
3
Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.已清除血糖监测仪的性能
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):895-910. doi: 10.1177/1932296815584797. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
4
The surveillance error grid.监测误差网格。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):658-72. doi: 10.1177/1932296814539589. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
5
The chronic injury glucose error grid: a tool to reduce diabetes complications.慢性损伤血糖误差网格:一种减少糖尿病并发症的工具。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jan;9(1):149-52. doi: 10.1177/1932296814554415. Epub 2014 Oct 14.