Van Ravesteyn Leontien M, Tulen Joke H M, Kamperman Astrid M, Raats Monique E, Schneider A J Tom, Birnie Erwin, Steegers Eric A P, Hoogendijk Witte J G, Tiemeier Henning W, Lambregtse-van den Berg Mijke P
Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, subdivision of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Oct 15;10(10):1137-41. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4118.
Disturbed sleep during pregnancy is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes and less mental well-being. In pregnant women with a mental disorder, who frequently suffer from sleep problems, it is unknown whether predominantly objective or subjective sleep quality is more affected. To clarify this, we compared objective and subjective parameters of sleep quality between patients and healthy controls during pregnancy.
This observational study was embedded in an ongoing study among pregnant women with a mental disorder at the department of Psychiatry of Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands. We compared 21 pregnant women with a confirmed mental disorder with 33 healthy controls (gestational age, 23-29 weeks). To measure objective parameters of sleep quality, all participants continuously wore a wrist actigraph for 7 days and nights. Subjective sleep quality was retrospectively assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and on a daily basis with the Subjective Sleep Quality-scale (SSQ). Differences in parameters of sleep between patients and controls were tested using a multivariate linear regression analysis adjusted for parity, gestational age, educational level, and employment status.
Objective parameters of sleep quality and subjective sleep quality as assessed by the PSQI did not differ significantly between patients and controls. Daily sleep reports showed that, relative to controls, patients had a significantly worse average SSQ-score (5.2 vs. 7.6, adjusted β = 0.12, 95%CI = 0.03-0.53, p < 0.01).
Our exploratory study suggests that perceived sleep quality reported on a daily basis by pregnant women with a mental disorder is worse than the sleep quality as measured by wrist actigraphy.
孕期睡眠紊乱与不良产科结局及心理健康状况欠佳有关。在经常存在睡眠问题的患有精神障碍的孕妇中,尚不清楚主要是客观睡眠质量还是主观睡眠质量受到的影响更大。为阐明这一点,我们比较了孕期患者与健康对照者睡眠质量的客观和主观参数。
这项观察性研究纳入了荷兰鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学医学中心精神病科正在进行的一项针对患有精神障碍的孕妇的研究。我们将21名确诊患有精神障碍的孕妇与33名健康对照者(孕周23 - 29周)进行了比较。为测量睡眠质量的客观参数,所有参与者连续7个昼夜佩戴腕部活动记录仪。使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)对主观睡眠质量进行回顾性评估,并每日使用主观睡眠质量量表(SSQ)进行评估。采用多变量线性回归分析对患者和对照者之间的睡眠参数差异进行检验,并对产次、孕周、教育水平和就业状况进行了校正。
患者与对照者之间,通过PSQI评估的睡眠质量客观参数和主观睡眠质量并无显著差异。每日睡眠报告显示,与对照者相比,患者的平均SSQ评分显著更低(5.2对7.6,校正β = 0.12,95%CI = 0.03 - 0.53,p < 0.01)。
我们的探索性研究表明,患有精神障碍的孕妇每日报告的感知睡眠质量比通过腕部活动记录仪测量的睡眠质量更差。