• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种用于临床实践指南的新型多层呈现格式。

Development of a novel, multilayered presentation format for clinical practice guidelines.

作者信息

Kristiansen Annette, Brandt Linn, Alonso-Coello Pablo, Agoritsas Thomas, Akl Elie A, Conboy Tara, Elbarbary Mahmoud, Ferwana Mazen, Medani Wedad, Murad Mohammad Hassan, Rigau David, Rosenbaum Sarah, Spencer Frederick A, Treweek Shaun, Guyatt Gordon, Vandvik Per Olav

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Institute for Health and Society, Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Institute of Biomedical Research, Sant Pau, Spain.

出版信息

Chest. 2015 Mar;147(3):754-763. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1366.

DOI:10.1378/chest.14-1366
PMID:25317597
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bridging the gap between clinical research and everyday health-care practice requires effective communication strategies. To address current shortcomings in conveying practice recommendations and supporting evidence, we are creating and testing presentation formats for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

METHODS

We carried out multiple cycles of brainstorming and sketching, developing a prototype. Physicians participating in the user testing viewed CPG formats linked to clinical scenarios and engaged in semistructured interviews applying a think-aloud method for exploring important aspects of user experience.

RESULTS

We developed a multilayered presentation format that allows clinicians to successively view more in-depth information. Starting with the recommendations, clinicians can, on demand, access a rationale and a key information section containing statements on quality of the evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable consequences, values and preferences, and resource considerations. We collected feedback from 27 stakeholders and performed user testing with 47 practicing physicians from six countries. Advisory group feedback and user testing of the first version revealed problems with conceptual understanding of underlying CPG methodology, as well as difficulties with the complexity of the layout and content. Extensive revisions made before the second round of user testing resulted in most participants expressing overall satisfaction with the final presentation format.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed an electronic, multilayered, CPG format that enhances the usability of CPGs for frontline clinicians. We have implemented the format in electronic guideline tools that guideline organizations can now use when authoring and publishing their guidelines.

摘要

背景

弥合临床研究与日常医疗实践之间的差距需要有效的沟通策略。为解决当前在传达实践建议和支持证据方面的不足,我们正在创建并测试临床实践指南(CPG)的呈现形式。

方法

我们进行了多个轮次的头脑风暴和草图设计,开发出一个原型。参与用户测试的医生查看了与临床场景相关联的CPG形式,并采用出声思考法进行半结构化访谈,以探索用户体验的重要方面。

结果

我们开发了一种多层呈现形式,使临床医生能够依次查看更深入的信息。从建议开始,临床医生可以根据需要访问一个理论依据和一个关键信息部分,其中包含关于证据质量、期望与不期望后果之间的平衡、价值观和偏好以及资源考量的陈述。我们收集了27位利益相关者的反馈,并对来自六个国家的47名执业医生进行了用户测试。第一轮版本的咨询小组反馈和用户测试揭示了对CPG基本方法的概念理解存在问题,以及布局和内容复杂性方面的困难。在第二轮用户测试之前进行的广泛修订使大多数参与者对最终呈现形式总体表示满意。

结论

我们开发了一种电子多层CPG形式,提高了CPG对一线临床医生的可用性。我们已将该形式应用于电子指南工具中,指南组织在编写和发布指南时现在可以使用。

相似文献

1
Development of a novel, multilayered presentation format for clinical practice guidelines.开发一种用于临床实践指南的新型多层呈现格式。
Chest. 2015 Mar;147(3):754-763. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1366.
2
Design and pilot evaluation of a system to develop computer-based site-specific practice guidelines from decision models.基于决策模型开发计算机化特定部位实践指南的系统设计与初步评估
Med Decis Making. 2000 Apr-Jun;20(2):145-59. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000201.
3
Clinicians' experience with infographic summaries from the BMJ Rapid Recommendations: a qualitative user-testing study among residents and interns at a large teaching hospital in Switzerland.临床医生对《英国医学杂志》快速建议中的信息图表摘要的体验:瑞士一家大型教学医院住院医师和实习医生的定性用户测试研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 10;15(2):e083032. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083032.
4
Multilayered and digitally structured presentation formats of trustworthy recommendations: a combined survey and randomised trial.可靠推荐的多层级和数字结构化呈现形式:一项综合调查与随机试验
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 10;7(2):e011569. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011569.
5
Quality Assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines Developed by Professional Societies in Turkey.土耳其专业协会制定的临床实践指南的质量评估
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 13;11(6):e0156483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156483. eCollection 2016.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Critical Appraisal of International Clinical Practice Guidelines in Kidney Transplantation Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Education II Tool: A Systematic Review.使用评估研究和教育指南 II 工具对肾移植国际临床实践指南进行批判性评估:系统评价。
Transplantation. 2018 Sep;102(9):1419-1439. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002255.
8
Headache and migraine clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and assessment of complementary and alternative medicine recommendations.头痛和偏头痛临床实践指南:补充和替代医学建议的系统评价和评估。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03401-3.
9
The updating of clinical practice guidelines: insights from an international survey.临床实践指南的更新:国际调查的见解。
Implement Sci. 2011 Sep 13;6:107. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-107.
10
Applying new strategies for the national adaptation, updating, and dissemination of trustworthy guidelines: results from the Norwegian adaptation of the Antithrombotic Therapy and the Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th Ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.应用新策略进行国家适应、更新和传播可靠指南:来自挪威对《抗血栓治疗和血栓预防,第 9 版:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南》的改编的结果。
Chest. 2014 Sep;146(3):735-761. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2993.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinicians' experience with infographic summaries from the BMJ Rapid Recommendations: a qualitative user-testing study among residents and interns at a large teaching hospital in Switzerland.临床医生对《英国医学杂志》快速建议中的信息图表摘要的体验:瑞士一家大型教学医院住院医师和实习医生的定性用户测试研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 10;15(2):e083032. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083032.
2
Effective web-based clinical practice guidelines resources: recommendations from a mixed methods usability study.基于网络的有效临床实践指南资源:一项混合方法可用性研究的建议。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 24;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01974-1.
3
Decision aids linked to the recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: results of the acceptability of a decision aid for patients with generalized anxiety disorder.
与临床实践指南推荐相关的决策辅助工具:一项针对广泛性焦虑障碍患者的决策辅助工具可接受性的研究结果。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01899-2.
4
User testing of a Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network public guideline for the parents of children with autism.对苏格兰校际指南网公共指南的用户测试,该指南针对自闭症儿童的家长。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 15;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07384-2.
5
A scoping review of knowledge authoring tools used for developing computerized clinical decision support systems.对用于开发计算机化临床决策支持系统的知识创作工具的范围综述。
JAMIA Open. 2021 Dec 16;4(4):ooab106. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab106. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Towards User-Oriented Recommendations for Local Therapy of Leg and Foot Ulcers-An Update of a S3-German Guideline.面向用户的下肢和足部溃疡局部治疗推荐——德国 S3 指南更新。
Med Sci (Basel). 2021 Aug 11;9(3):54. doi: 10.3390/medsci9030054.
7
Decision aids linked to evidence summaries and clinical practice guidelines: results from user-testing in clinical encounters.与证据总结和临床实践指南相关的决策辅助工具:临床诊疗中用户测试的结果
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 29;21(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01541-7.
8
Developing Evidence to Decision Frameworks and an Interactive Evidence to Decision Tool for Making and Using Decisions and Recommendations in Health Care.开发用于医疗保健决策制定和建议的证据到决策框架以及交互式证据到决策工具。
Glob Chall. 2018 Jan 10;2(9):1700081. doi: 10.1002/gch2.201700081. eCollection 2018 Sep.
9
UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.《UpToDate》对强烈推荐的GRADE标准的遵循情况:一项分析性调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 16;7(11):e018593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018593.
10
Reviewing clinical guideline development tools: features and characteristics.审视临床指南制定工具:特点与特性
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Sep 4;17(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0530-5.