Thomson John-Edwin, Kruger Deirdré, Jann-Kruger Christine, Kiss Akos, Omoshoro-Jones J A O, Luvhengo Thifheli, Brand Martin
Department of Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Old Potch Road, Moreleta Park, Soweto, Johannesburg, 2013, South Africa,
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):2027-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3906-y. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
To date, no randomized control trial has been performed comparing open appendectomy (OA) to laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in complicated appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis in 2010 concluded LA is advantageous to OA with less surgical site sepsis in complicated appendicitis; however, the level of evidence is weak (level 3a). The aim of the study was to determine whether LA is safe in the treatment of complicated appendicitis. Primary outcome included all-cause mortality and procedure-related mortality; secondary outcomes included intra-operative duration, rates of wound sepsis and re-intervention, length of hospital stay and re-admission rates.
One hundred and fourteen patients were randomized prospectively to either OA or LA using a computer-generated blind method. Patients who were either less than 12 years of age, had previous abdominal surgery or were pregnant were excluded. A team of senior surgeons capable of doing both OA and LA performed all procedures.
The intra-operative duration, the rate of wound sepsis, the number of re-operations, the length of hospital stay and the rate of re-admissions between the OA and LA groups did not differ statistically.
Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe in complicated appendicitis. Current Control Trials (ISRCTN92257749).
迄今为止,尚无关于复杂阑尾炎患者行开腹阑尾切除术(OA)与腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)对比的随机对照试验。2010年的一项系统评价和荟萃分析得出结论,在复杂阑尾炎中,LA较OA更具优势,手术部位感染更少;然而,证据级别较弱(3a级)。本研究的目的是确定LA治疗复杂阑尾炎是否安全。主要结局包括全因死亡率和与手术相关的死亡率;次要结局包括术中时长、伤口感染率和再次干预率、住院时间和再入院率。
采用计算机生成的盲法将114例患者前瞻性随机分为OA组或LA组。排除年龄小于12岁、既往有腹部手术史或怀孕的患者。由一组能够同时开展OA和LA的资深外科医生实施所有手术操作。
OA组和LA组之间的术中时长、伤口感染率、再次手术次数、住院时间和再入院率在统计学上无差异。
腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂阑尾炎是安全的。当前对照试验(ISRCTN92257749)。