Kleinschmidt Kerstin, Wagner-Ecker Mechthild, Bartek Benjamin, Holschbach Jeannine, Richter Wiltrud
Research Centre for Experimental Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail address for W. Richter:
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 15;96(20):1699-707. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01462.
The clinical application of bone morphogenetic proteins such as BMP-2 and GDF-5 (growth and differentiation factor-5) may improve the outcome of bone defect repair. In addition to the osteoinductivity of BMPs, their angiogenic potential is important as an adequate blood supply is a prerequisite for bone-healing. We used a rabbit long-bone defect model to investigate whether angiogenicity and osteogenicity were correlated features of a BMP molecule by comparing the induction of blood vessel and bone formation by BMP-2, GDF-5, and a previously created swap mutant GDF-5V453/V456 (BB-1) with elevated BMP receptor-IA binding.
Microcomputed tomography and immunohistochemistry were used to assess early bone formation and neovascularization in 15-mm (critical-sized) rabbit radius defects treated with a growth factor-loaded collagen carrier.
Blood vessel volume and surface area on days 7 and 14 after surgery were significantly greater in defects treated with GDF-5 and with BB-1 compared with controls (p < 0.05); BMP-2 enhanced vascularization on day 14 (p < 0.05). Cumulative data including both time points reflected increased vessel volume, intersection surface area, and number of vessels after treatment with GDF-5 and BB-1 compared with BMP-2 (p < 0.05), corresponding to the histology results. Each of the growth factors resulted in enhanced bone formation compared with controls on day 14 (p < 0.01), with BB-1 resulting in significantly more bone compared with GDF-5 as indicated by bone volume and surface area (p = 0.006).
Both GDF-5 and BB-1 had high angiogenicity, and BB-1 outperformed GDF-5 with respect to osteogenicity. Strong induction of bone formation by BMP-2 and BB-1 was thus associated with BMP receptor-IA-dependent signaling, whereas the vascularization outcome was not.
Although both BMP-2 and the GDF-5 variant BB-1 are good inducers of bone formation, BB-1 is especially promising for long-bone healing if high angiogenicity is desired along with high osteogenicity to promote recreation of optimal bone architecture.
骨形态发生蛋白如BMP-2和GDF-5(生长分化因子-5)的临床应用可能会改善骨缺损修复的效果。除了骨形态发生蛋白的骨诱导性外,它们的血管生成潜力也很重要,因为充足的血液供应是骨愈合的前提条件。我们使用兔长骨缺损模型,通过比较BMP-2、GDF-5以及先前构建的具有升高的BMP受体-IA结合能力的交换突变体GDF-5V453/V456(BB-1)对血管和骨形成的诱导作用,来研究血管生成性和成骨性是否是BMP分子的相关特征。
使用微型计算机断层扫描和免疫组织化学来评估用生长因子负载的胶原载体治疗的15毫米(临界尺寸)兔桡骨缺损中的早期骨形成和新生血管形成。
与对照组相比,用GDF-5和BB-1治疗的缺损在术后第7天和第14天的血管体积和表面积显著更大(p<0.05);BMP-2在第14天增强了血管生成(p<0.05)。包括两个时间点的累积数据显示,与BMP-2相比,用GDF-5和BB-1治疗后血管体积、交叉表面积和血管数量增加(p<0.05),这与组织学结果一致。与对照组相比,在第14天,每种生长因子均导致骨形成增强(p<0.01),从骨体积和表面积来看,BB-1导致的骨量明显多于GDF-5(p = 0.006)。
GDF-5和BB-1均具有高血管生成性,并且BB-1在成骨性方面优于GDF-5。因此,BMP-2和BB-1对骨形成的强烈诱导与BMP受体-IA依赖性信号传导相关,而血管生成结果则不然。
尽管BMP-2和GDF-5变体BB-1都是骨形成的良好诱导剂,但如果需要高血管生成性和高成骨性以促进最佳骨结构的重建,BB-1对于长骨愈合尤其有前景。