Walsh James T, Zheng Jingjing, Smirnov Igor, Lorenz Ulrike, Tung Kenneth, Kipnis Jonathan
Center for Brain Immunology and Glia, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, Medical Scientist Training Program, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908;
Center for Brain Immunology and Glia, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908; Institute of Neurosciences, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, China;
J Immunol. 2014 Nov 15;193(10):5013-22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302401. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
Previous research investigating the roles of T effector (T(eff)) and T regulatory (T(reg)) cells after injury to the CNS has yielded contradictory conclusions, with both protective and destructive functions being ascribed to each of these T cell subpopulations. In this work, we study this dichotomy by examining how regulation of the immune system affects the response to CNS trauma. We show that, in response to CNS injury, T(eff) and T(reg) subsets in the CNS-draining deep cervical lymph nodes are activated, and surgical resection of these lymph nodes results in impaired neuronal survival. Depletion of T(reg), not surprisingly, induces a robust T(eff) response in the draining lymph nodes and is associated with impaired neuronal survival. Interestingly, however, injection of exogenous T(reg) cells, which limits the spontaneous beneficial immune response after CNS injury, also impairs neuronal survival. We found that no T(reg) accumulate at the site of CNS injury, and that changes in T(reg) numbers do not alter the amount of infiltration by other immune cells into the site of injury. The phenotype of macrophages at the site, however, is affected: both addition and removal of T(reg) negatively impact the numbers of macrophages with alternatively activated (tissue-building) phenotype. Our data demonstrate that neuronal survival after CNS injury is impaired when T(reg) cells are either removed or added. With this exacerbation of neurodegeneration seen with both addition and depletion of T(reg), we recommend exercising extreme caution when considering the therapeutic targeting of T(reg) cells after CNS injury, and possibly in chronic neurodegenerative conditions.
先前有关中枢神经系统(CNS)损伤后效应T(Teff)细胞和调节性T(Treg)细胞作用的研究得出了相互矛盾的结论,这两种T细胞亚群都被认为具有保护和破坏功能。在这项研究中,我们通过研究免疫系统的调节如何影响对CNS创伤的反应来探讨这种二分法。我们发现,响应CNS损伤时,引流CNS的颈深淋巴结中的Teff和Treg亚群会被激活,手术切除这些淋巴结会导致神经元存活受损。不出所料,Treg的耗竭会在引流淋巴结中诱导强烈的Teff反应,并与神经元存活受损有关。然而,有趣的是,注射外源性Treg细胞会限制CNS损伤后自发的有益免疫反应,这也会损害神经元存活。我们发现CNS损伤部位没有Treg聚集,并且Treg数量的变化不会改变其他免疫细胞向损伤部位的浸润量。然而,损伤部位巨噬细胞的表型受到影响:添加和去除Treg都会对具有交替激活(组织构建)表型的巨噬细胞数量产生负面影响。我们的数据表明,当Treg细胞被去除或添加时,CNS损伤后的神经元存活都会受损。鉴于添加和去除Treg都会加剧神经退行性变,我们建议在考虑CNS损伤后,以及可能在慢性神经退行性疾病中对Treg细胞进行治疗靶向时要格外谨慎。