Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Laboratory of Virology, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, USA.
J Virol. 2015 Jan;89(1):144-54. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02308-14. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
The emerging zoonotic pathogens Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV) are in the genus Henipavirus in the family Paramyxoviridae. HeV and NiV infections can be highly fatal to humans and livestock. The goal of this study was to develop candidate vaccines against henipaviruses utilizing two well-established rhabdoviral vaccine vector platforms, recombinant rabies virus (RABV) and recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), expressing either the codon-optimized or the wild-type (wt) HeV glycoprotein (G) gene. The RABV vector expressing the codon-optimized HeV G showed a 2- to 3-fold increase in incorporation compared to the RABV vector expressing wt HeV G. There was no significant difference in HeV G incorporation in the VSV vectors expressing either wt or codon-optimized HeV G. Mice inoculated intranasally with any of these live recombinant viruses showed no signs of disease, including weight loss, indicating that HeV G expression and incorporation did not increase the neurotropism of the vaccine vectors. To test the immunogenicity of the vaccine candidates, we immunized mice intramuscularly with either one dose of the live vaccines or 3 doses of 10 μg chemically inactivated viral particles. Increased codon-optimized HeV G incorporation into RABV virions resulted in higher antibody titers against HeV G compared to inactivated RABV virions expressing wt HeV G. The live VSV vectors induced more HeV G-specific antibodies as well as higher levels of HeV neutralizing antibodies than the RABV vectors. In the case of killed particles, HeV neutralizing serum titers were very similar between the two platforms. These results indicated that killed RABV with codon-optimized HeV G should be the vector of choice as a dual vaccine in areas where rabies is endemic.
Scientists have been tracking two new viruses carried by the Pteropid fruit bats: Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV). Both viruses can be fatal to humans and also pose a serious risk to domestic animals. A recent escalation in the frequency of outbreaks has increased the need for a vaccine that prevents HeV and NiV infections. In this study, we performed an extensive comparison of live and killed particles of two recombinant rhabdoviral vectors, rabies virus and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), expressing wild-type or codon-optimized HeV glycoprotein, with the goal of developing a candidate vaccine against HeV. Based on our data from the presented mouse immunogenicity studies, we conclude that a killed RABV vaccine would be highly effective against HeV infections and would make an excellent vaccine candidate in areas where both RABV and henipaviruses pose a threat to human health.
亨德拉病毒(HeV)和尼帕病毒(NiV)是副黏病毒科亨尼帕病毒属中的新兴人畜共患病原体。HeV 和 NiV 感染对人类和家畜可能具有高度致命性。本研究的目的是利用两种成熟的副黏病毒疫苗载体平台,即重组狂犬病病毒(RABV)和重组水疱性口炎病毒(VSV),开发针对亨尼帕病毒的候选疫苗,表达经密码子优化或野生型(wt)HeV 糖蛋白(G)基因。表达经密码子优化的 HeV G 的 RABV 载体与表达 wt HeV G 的 RABV 载体相比,掺入量增加了 2-3 倍。表达 wt 或经密码子优化的 HeV G 的 VSV 载体中 HeV G 的掺入量没有显著差异。经鼻腔接种这些活重组病毒的小鼠没有出现疾病迹象,包括体重减轻,表明 HeV G 表达和掺入并未增加疫苗载体的嗜神经性。为了测试候选疫苗的免疫原性,我们通过肌肉内接种活疫苗或 3 剂 10μg 化学灭活病毒颗粒中的任一种对小鼠进行免疫。与表达 wt HeV G 的灭活 RABV 病毒相比,增加 RABV 病毒粒子中经密码子优化的 HeV G 的掺入量导致针对 HeV G 的抗体滴度更高。活 VSV 载体诱导的 HeV G 特异性抗体以及 HeV 中和抗体水平均高于 RABV 载体。在灭活颗粒的情况下,两种平台之间的 HeV 中和血清滴度非常相似。这些结果表明,在狂犬病流行的地区,携带经密码子优化的 HeV G 的灭活 RABV 应该是作为双重疫苗的首选载体。
科学家一直在追踪两种由果蝠携带的新病毒:亨德拉病毒(HeV)和尼帕病毒(NiV)。这两种病毒对人类都可能是致命的,并且对家畜也构成严重威胁。最近爆发频率的上升增加了对预防 HeV 和 NiV 感染的疫苗的需求。在这项研究中,我们对表达野生型或密码子优化的 HeV 糖蛋白的两种重组副黏病毒载体,狂犬病病毒和水疱性口炎病毒(VSV)的活和灭活颗粒进行了广泛比较,旨在开发针对 HeV 的候选疫苗。根据我们从呈现的小鼠免疫原性研究中获得的数据,我们得出结论,灭活 RABV 疫苗将对 HeV 感染非常有效,并且在 RABV 和亨尼帕病毒都对人类健康构成威胁的地区将成为一种极好的疫苗候选物。