• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Real time shear wave elastography in chronic liver diseases: accuracy for predicting liver fibrosis, in comparison with serum markers.慢性肝病中的实时剪切波弹性成像:与血清标志物相比,预测肝纤维化的准确性
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13920-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13920.
2
Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study.实时剪切波弹性成像评估慢性丙型肝炎肝纤维化的准确性:一项初步研究。
Hepatology. 2012 Dec;56(6):2125-33. doi: 10.1002/hep.25936. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
3
Study of detection times for liver stiffness evaluation by shear wave elastography.基于剪切波弹性成像技术评估肝脏硬度的检测时间研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 28;20(28):9578-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9578.
4
Assessment of liver fibrosis by Fibroscan as compared to liver biopsy in biliary atresia.在胆道闭锁中,比较Fibroscan与肝活检对肝纤维化的评估。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 14;21(22):6931-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6931.
5
Comparison between T1 relaxation time of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and liver stiffness measurement of ultrasound elastography in the evaluation of cirrhotic liver.钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像的T1弛豫时间与超声弹性成像肝脏硬度测量在肝硬化肝脏评估中的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Feb;41(2):329-38. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24529. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
6
Liver stiffness measured with two-dimensional shear wave elastography comparable to histopathology falls dominantly on the severe liver fibrosis.二维剪切波弹性成像测量的肝硬度与组织病理学相比,主要落在严重肝纤维化上。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2021;79(4):587-596. doi: 10.3233/CH-211223.
7
Baseline values and changes in liver stiffness measured by transient elastography are associated with severity of fibrosis and outcomes of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.瞬时弹性成像测量的肝硬度的基线值和变化与原发性硬化性胆管炎患者纤维化的严重程度和结局相关。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Apr;146(4):970-9; quiz e15-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.030. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
8
Liver Fibrosis Evaluation Using Real-time Shear Wave Elastography in Hepatitis C-Monoinfected and Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Hepatitis C-Coinfected Patients.在丙型肝炎单感染及人类免疫缺陷病毒/丙型肝炎合并感染患者中使用实时剪切波弹性成像评估肝纤维化
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Jun;35(6):1299-308. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.08066. Epub 2016 May 5.
9
Evaluation of transient elastography in assessing liver fibrosis in patients with autoimmune hepatitis.瞬时弹性成像评估自身免疫性肝炎患者肝纤维化的研究
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;32(3):639-644. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13508.
10
Fibroscan can avoid liver biopsy in Indian patients with chronic hepatitis B.Fibroscan 可避免印度慢性乙型肝炎患者进行肝活检。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;28(11):1738-45. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12318.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of the Degree of Liver Fibrosis on Ultrasound-Based Fibroscan and Hyaluran Tests in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.基于超声的Fibroscan和透明质酸检测对慢性肝病患者肝纤维化程度的比较评估
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2025 Apr-Jun;15(2):136-141. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_82_23. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
2
Evaluation of Hepatic Shear Wave Elastography to Assess Liver Fibrosis in Biliary Atresia Patients and Its Correlation with Liver Histology and Surgical Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study.肝剪切波弹性成像评估胆道闭锁患者肝纤维化及其与肝脏组织学和手术结果的相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2024 Jun 6;34(4):646-652. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787668. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Ensemble for evaluating diagnostic efficacy of non-invasive indices in predicting liver fibrosis in untreated hepatitis C virus population.用于评估未治疗丙型肝炎病毒人群中无创指标预测肝纤维化诊断效能的整合模型。
World J Methodol. 2024 Sep 20;14(3):91058. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i3.91058.
4
Distinct ways to perform a liver biopsy: The core technique setups and updated understanding of these modalities.进行肝活检的不同方法:核心技术设置及对这些方式的最新认识。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2023 Nov-Dec;12(6):437-444. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000035. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
5
Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography for Determining the Ideal Site of Liver Biopsy in Diffuse Liver Disease.实时剪切波弹性成像用于确定弥漫性肝病肝活检的理想部位
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023 Aug 16;34(1):44-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771529. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Shear-wave elastography for evaluation of hepatic stiffness in chronic viral hepatitis B and C.剪切波弹性成像用于评估慢性乙型和丙型病毒性肝炎的肝脏硬度。
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Jun;9(2):179-186. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2023.129112. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
7
Clinical importance of laboratory biomarkers in liver fibrosis.实验室生物标志物在肝纤维化中的临床重要性。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Oct 1;32(3):030501. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.030501.
8
Analysis of Point Shear Wave Elastography and Biochemical Markers for the Detection of Liver Fibrosis.分析点剪切波弹性成像和生化标志物在肝纤维化检测中的应用。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 6;57(1):40. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010040.
9
Ultrasound shear wave elastography and liver biopsy to determine liver fibrosis in adult patients.超声剪切波弹性成像与肝活检用于确定成年患者的肝纤维化情况。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Feb 28;9(2):943-949. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_828_19. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography in staging hepatic fibrosis: a meta-analysis.实时剪切波弹性成像在肝纤维化分期中的准确性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-0414-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study.实时剪切波弹性成像评估慢性丙型肝炎肝纤维化的准确性:一项初步研究。
Hepatology. 2012 Dec;56(6):2125-33. doi: 10.1002/hep.25936. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
2
Noninvasive methods to assess liver disease in patients with hepatitis B or C.用于评估乙型肝炎或丙型肝炎患者肝脏疾病的非侵入性方法。
Gastroenterology. 2012 May;142(6):1293-1302.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.02.017.
3
Performance of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a pooled meta-analysis.声辐射力脉冲成像技术在肝纤维化分期中的应用性能:荟萃分析。
J Viral Hepat. 2012 Feb;19(2):e212-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01537.x. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
4
Comparison of nine blood tests and transient elastography for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: the ANRS HCEP-23 study.比较九种血液检测和瞬时弹性成像在慢性丙型肝炎肝纤维化中的应用:ANRS HCEP-23 研究。
J Hepatol. 2012 Jan;56(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.05.024. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
5
Noninvasive in vivo liver fibrosis evaluation using supersonic shear imaging: a clinical study on 113 hepatitis C virus patients.应用超声剪切波弹性成像技术无创性评估活体肝纤维化:113 例丙型肝炎病毒感染者的临床研究。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Sep;37(9):1361-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
6
The usefulness of liver stiffness measurement using FibroScan in chronic hepatitis C in South Korea: a multicenter, prospective study.韩国慢性丙型肝炎中使用 FibroScan 进行肝硬度测量的效用:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;26(1):171-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06385.x.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of FibroScan and comparison to liver fibrosis biomarkers in chronic viral hepatitis: a multicenter prospective study (the FIBROSTIC study).FibroScan 在慢性病毒性肝炎中的诊断准确性及其与肝纤维化生物标志物的比较:一项多中心前瞻性研究(FIBROSTIC 研究)。
J Hepatol. 2010 Dec;53(6):1013-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.035. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
8
Liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: differentiating minimal from intermediate fibrosis with perfusion CT.慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染中的肝纤维化:用灌注 CT 区分最小纤维化和中间纤维化。
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):135-42. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091295.
9
Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations.肝脏硬度测量的陷阱:一项 13369 次检查的 5 年前瞻性研究。
Hepatology. 2010 Mar;51(3):828-35. doi: 10.1002/hep.23425.
10
[Comparison of various noninvasive serum markers of liver fibrosis in chronic viral liver disease].[慢性病毒性肝病中各种肝纤维化无创血清标志物的比较]
Korean J Hepatol. 2009 Dec;15(4):454-63. doi: 10.3350/kjhep.2009.15.4.454.

慢性肝病中的实时剪切波弹性成像:与血清标志物相比,预测肝纤维化的准确性

Real time shear wave elastography in chronic liver diseases: accuracy for predicting liver fibrosis, in comparison with serum markers.

作者信息

Jeong Jae Yoon, Kim Tae Yeob, Sohn Joo Hyun, Kim Yongsoo, Jeong Woo Kyoung, Oh Young-Ha, Yoo Kyo-Sang

机构信息

Jae Yoon Jeong, Tae Yeob Kim, Joo Hyun Sohn, Kyo-Sang Yoo, Department of Gastroenterology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 133-791, South Korea.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13920-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13920.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13920
PMID:25320528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4194574/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the correlation between liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) and liver fibrosis stage and the accuracy of LSM for predicting significant and advanced fibrosis, in comparison with serum markers.

METHODS

We consecutively analyzed 70 patients with various chronic liver diseases. Liver fibrosis was staged from F0 to F4 according to the Batts and Ludwig scoring system. Significant and advanced fibrosis was defined as stage F ≥ 2 and F ≥ 3, respectively. The accuracy of prediction for fibrosis was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Seventy patients, 15 were belonged to F0-F1 stage, 20 F2, 13 F3 and 22 F4. LSM was increased with progression of fibrosis stage (F0-F1: 6.77 ± 1.72, F2: 9.98 ± 3.99, F3: 15.80 ± 7.73, and F4: 22.09 ± 10.09, P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracies of LSM for prediction of F ≥ 2 and F ≥ 3 were 0.915 (95%CI: 0.824-0.968, P < 0.001) and 0.913 (95%CI: 0.821-0.967, P < 0.001), respectively. The cut-off values of LSM for prediction of F ≥ 2 and F ≥ 3 were 8.6 kPa with 78.2% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity and 10.46 kPa with 88.6% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity, respectively. However, there were no significant differences between LSM and serum hyaluronic acid and type IV collagen in diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

SWE showed a significant correlation with the severity of liver fibrosis and was useful and accurate to predict significant and advanced fibrosis, comparable with serum markers.

摘要

目的

通过实时剪切波弹性成像(SWE)评估肝脏硬度测量(LSM)与肝纤维化分期之间的相关性,以及LSM预测显著纤维化和进展性纤维化的准确性,并与血清标志物进行比较。

方法

我们连续分析了70例患有各种慢性肝病的患者。根据Batts和Ludwig评分系统,肝纤维化分期为F0至F4。显著纤维化和进展性纤维化分别定义为F≥2期和F≥3期。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析纤维化预测的准确性。

结果

70例患者中,15例属于F0 - F1期,20例F2期,13例F3期,22例F4期。LSM随着纤维化分期的进展而增加(F0 - F1:6.77±1.72,F2:9.98±3.99,F3:15.80±7.73,F4:22.09±10.09,P<0.001)。LSM预测F≥2和F≥3的诊断准确性分别为0.915(95%CI:0.824 - 0.968,P<0.001)和0.913(95%CI:0.821 - 0.967,P<0.001)。LSM预测F≥2和F≥3的截断值分别为8.6 kPa,灵敏度为78.2%,特异性为93.3%;1