Lorenzo Rosaria Di, Miani Fiorenza, Formicola Vitantonio, Ferri Paola
Psychiatrist of Mental Health Department, SPDC-Modena Centro, NOCSAE, via Giardini 1355, 41126 Baggiovara(MO), Italy.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2014 Oct 3;10:94-102. doi: 10.2174/1745017901410010094. eCollection 2014.
The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency of mechanical restraint use in an acute psychiatric ward and to analyze which variables may have significantly influenced the use of this procedure.
This retrospective study was conducted in the Servizio Psichiatrico di Diagnosi e Cura (SPDC) of Modena Centro. The following variables of our sample, represented by all restrained patients admitted from 1-1-2005 to 31-12-2012, were analyzed: age, gender, nationality, psychiatric diagnoses, organic comorbidity, state and duration of admission, motivation and duration of restraints, nursing shift and hospitalization day of restraint, number of patients admitted at the time of restraint and institutional changes during the observation period. The above variables were statistically compared with those of all other non-restrained patients admitted to our ward in the same period.
Mechanical restraints were primarily used as a safety procedure to manage aggressive behavior of male patients, during the first days of hospitalization and night shifts. Neurocognitive disorders, organic comorbidity, compulsory state and long duration of admission were statistically significantly related to the increase of restraint use (p<.001, multivariate logistic regression). Institutional changes, especially more restricted guidelines concerning restraint application, were statistically significantly related to restraint use reduction (p<.001, chi2 test, multivariate logistic regression).
The data obtained highlight that mechanical restraint use was influenced not only by clinical factors, but mainly by staff and policy factors, which have permitted a gradual but significant reduction in the use of this procedure through a multidimensional approach.
本研究的目的是描述急性精神科病房使用机械约束的频率,并分析哪些变量可能对该措施的使用产生显著影响。
本回顾性研究在摩德纳中心精神病诊断与治疗服务部(SPDC)进行。分析了我们样本中的以下变量,这些变量由2005年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间所有接受约束的患者代表:年龄、性别、国籍、精神科诊断、器质性合并症、入院状态和持续时间、约束的动机和持续时间、护理班次和约束的住院日、约束时入院的患者数量以及观察期内的机构变化。将上述变量与同期在我们病房入院的所有其他未接受约束的患者的变量进行统计学比较。
机械约束主要作为一种安全措施,用于管理男性患者在住院初期和夜班期间的攻击行为。神经认知障碍、器质性合并症、强制状态和较长的入院时间与约束使用的增加在统计学上显著相关(p<.001,多因素逻辑回归)。机构变化,特别是关于约束应用的更严格指南,与约束使用的减少在统计学上显著相关(p<.001,卡方检验,多因素逻辑回归)。
获得的数据表明,机械约束的使用不仅受到临床因素的影响,主要还受到工作人员和政策因素的影响,这些因素通过多维度方法使得该措施的使用逐渐但显著减少。