Suppr超能文献

根据当地卫生部门提供的一系列服务对其进行分类。

Classifying local health departments on the basis of the constellation of services they provide.

作者信息

Bekemeier Betty, Pantazis Athena, Dunbar Matthew D, Herting Jerald R

机构信息

Betty Bekemeier is with the Department of Psychosocial and Community Health, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle. Athena Pantazis and Jerald R. Herting are with the Department of Sociology, University of Washington. Matthew D. Dunbar is with the Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, University of Washington.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):e77-82. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302281. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We explored service variation among local health departments (LHDs) nationally to allow systematic characterization of LHDs by patterns in the constellation of services they deliver.

METHODS

We conducted latent class analysis by using categorical variables derived from LHD service data collected in 2008 for the National Profile of Local Health Departments Survey and before service changes resulting from the national financial crisis.

RESULTS

A 3-class solution produced the best fit for this data set of 2294 LHDs. The 3 configurations of LHD services depicted an interrelated set of narrow or limited service provision (limited), a comprehensive (core) set of key services provided, and a third class of core and expanded services (core plus), which often included rare services. The classes demonstrated high geographic variability and were weakly associated with expenditure quintile and urban or rural location.

CONCLUSIONS

This empirically derived view of how LHDs organize their array of services is a unique approach to categorizing LHDs, providing an important tool for research and a gauge to monitor how changes in LHD service patterns occur.

摘要

目的

我们在全国范围内探索了地方卫生部门(LHD)之间的服务差异,以便通过其所提供服务组合的模式对LHD进行系统分类。

方法

我们使用从2008年收集的地方卫生部门全国概况调查的LHD服务数据中得出的分类变量进行潜在类别分析,该调查在国家金融危机导致服务变化之前进行。

结果

对于这个包含2294个LHD的数据集,三类解决方案最为合适。LHD服务的三种配置描绘了一组相互关联的狭窄或有限服务提供(有限)、一组提供的关键服务的综合(核心)集,以及第三类核心和扩展服务(核心加),后者通常包括罕见服务。这些类别显示出高度的地理变异性,并且与支出五分位数以及城市或农村位置的关联较弱。

结论

这种从经验中得出的关于LHD如何组织其服务阵列的观点是对LHD进行分类的独特方法,为研究提供了重要工具,并为监测LHD服务模式的变化提供了一种衡量标准。

相似文献

10
Are public health services available where they are most needed? An examination of local health department services.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):214-23. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200305000-00006.

本文引用的文献

8
The performance of local health departments: a review of the literature.地方卫生部门的绩效:文献综述
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):E9-18. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311903.34067.89.
9
Asleep at the switch: local public health and chronic disease.玩忽职守:地方公共卫生与慢性病
Am J Public Health. 2004 Dec;94(12):2059-61. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.12.2059.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验